Objectives To evaluate the effect and safety of mycobacterium vaccae in the treatment of recurrent treated pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods We searched PubMed (1997 to 2006), VIP (1997 to 2006), Wanfang database (1997 to 2006), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2006) and the National Research Register (1996 to 2006). Randomized controlled trials comparing the mycobacterium vaccae immunotherapy group and the control group were included. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Data were analyzed using RevMan 4.2.2 software by The Cochrane Collaboration. Results Eleven high quality trials were included. Meta-analyses showed that mycobacterium vaccae immunotherapy plus chemotherapy resulted in higher sputum negative conversion rate (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.54), higher lesion absorption rate (RR=1.39, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.72), and lower lesion non-absorption rate (RR=0.46, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.60), compared with the control group. These differences were all statistically significant. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion As an adjunct to chemotherapy, mycobacterium vaccae is helpful for patients with recurrent treated pulmonary tuberculosis in terms of improving cell-medicated immunity, sputum negative conversion and X-ray manifestation. More high quality studies are needed for further analysis.
The mortality rate of ovarian cancer is the highest among female reproductive tract malignancies. Although most patients have undergone recurrent treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, the recurrence rate is still high. The exploration of scholars in this field has never stopped. In recent years, remarkable achievements have been made in the medical treatment of ovarian cancer. The research of poly adenosinediphosphate-ribose polymerase, immunotherapy (immunocheckpoint inhibitor monotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with other drugs) and anti-angiogenic drugs have provided new methods for the treatment of this disease, and throughout the whole process of ovarian cancer treatment. This paper summarizes this, and aims to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of ovarian cancer.
Tumor immunotherapy includes immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy. Immunotherapy, as the main systemic treatment for advanced malignant tumors, kills tumor cells by activating the immune system and prolongs the survival of patients. However, excessive immune responses can cause immune-related adverse events (irAE), causing damage to systemic tissues. ICI are the main tumor immunotherapy drugs that cause optic nerve irAE. The most common optic nerve irAE are optic neuritis, only a few patients appeared arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Sudden painless loss of bilateral vision is the most common clinical manifestation. In severe cases, the vision decrease to no light perception. Early diagnosis and early adequate glucocorticoid treatment can improve the symptoms. Therefore, neuro-ophthalmologists and oncologists should know the clinical characteristics of optic nerve irAE, in order to diagnose and treat early and improve the prognosis.
It is very limited that the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the 5-year survival rate is only 5% higher than surgery. Antibodies that block programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death receptor-ligand 1 significantly improve the survival of advanced NSCLC. The value of immunotherapy in early NSCLC is also being explored. This paper firstly summarized and analyzed the progress of immunotherapy in the perioperative period of NSCLC. Secondly, the safety and feasibility of surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy were discussed. Finally, the clinical value of different therapeutic efficacy prediction indicators was summarized, in order to clarify the current status of immunotherapy in the perioperative period, so as to improve the clinical benefits of early NSCLC patients.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo generally analyze the current situations and advancement of the study on immunotherapy for colorectal cancer. MethodsThe pertinent published papers about the current situation and research advancement of the immunotherapy of colorectal cancer were retrospectively investigated. And also the immunogenicity and the varying principles of immunoresistance, the functional targets, the practicality, and some other characteristics of different immunotherapy for colorectal cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe main treatments and the research focuses in the immunotherapy of colorectal cancer are initiative nonspecific immunotherapy, adoptive immunotherapy, monoclonal antibody immunotherapy, initiative specific immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. They work by fighting against the cancer itself, cutting off the tumor’s nutrition supply, activating the immune system specifically or breaking the immune tolerance and so on. Though there are still many problems unsolved, immunotherapy has a promising clinical prospect. ConclusionAs a beneficial complement for surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy， immunotherapy plays an important auxiliary role in the combined therapy for colorectal cancer.
Esophageal cancer is one of the malignant tumors that poses a threat to human health, with both high incidence and malignancy. Currently, surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer; however, the long-term prognosis remains unsatisfactory. In recent years, inhibitors of programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (programmed death ligand-1, PD-L1) have achieved breakthrough progress in other solid tumors, and research on esophageal cancer is gradually being conducted. With the demonstration of good efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the first-line and second-line treatment of advanced unresectable esophageal cancer, their incorporation into neoadjuvant treatment regimens has become a hot topic. Therefore, this article reviews the mechanism of action of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and their application in the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of antibiotics on the outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect cohort studies on efficacy of antibiotics on the outcomes of patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors from inception to August 1st, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 27 cohort studies involving 7 087 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that antibiotic use was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR=2.04, 95%CI 1.68 to 2.49, P<0.000 01) and progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.63, 95%CI 1.35 to 1.99, P<0.000 01). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that antibiotic use is associated with poor OS and PFS. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Cancer immunotherapy refers to the therapeutic effect of controlling or eliminating tumor cells by interfering with the immune system to restore the anti-tumor immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy that blocks programmed death -1/programmed cell death ligand-1/cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 is one of the most commonly used tumor immunotherapies, with good efficacy and wide application. These drugs cause immune-related ocular complications such as uveitis, autoimmune retinopathy, and scleritis, which represent a new etiology of ocular inflammation. The ophthalmologist's grasp of the clinical characteristics of these diseases is helpful for timely diagnosis. At the same time, the ophthalmologist will work closely with the oncologist to make a comprehensive judgment based on the patient's primary tumor, survival prognosis, severity of adverse reactions related to ocular immunotherapy, and visual prognosis, and develop suitable therapeutic strategie, thereby saving the patients' vision and improving the quality of life.
Objective To review the advance in the experimental studies and evaluate the potential therapeutic application of the mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs). Methods The related articles published in China and theother countries during the recent years were extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results The MSCs were widely used in the cell-transplantation therapy and the tissue engineering because of their pluripotency of differentiation into various kinds of cells. They were also frequently used in the gene therapy because they could stably express the transfected objective genes. Because of their immunomodulatory function, the MSCs could also be used in the immunotherapy. Conclusion The MSCs are the stem cells, which have characteristics of renewing themselves, having multipotency, and being easy to undergo amplification in vitro.The MSCs are ideal target cells for the cell therapy, tissue engineering, gene therapy, and immunotherapy.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the clinical response rate of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor modified-T cells (CD19CART) in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect cohort studies about CD19CART in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies from 2000 to 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, a single rate meta-analysis was performed by R software and SPSS 16.0 software.ResultsA total of 13 prospective cohort studies were included. The results of single group rate meta-analysis showed that the overall pooled response rate of CD19 CART was 68% (95%CI 0.51 to 0.82). The 6 months and 1-year PFS after CD19 CART infused by Kaplan-Meier were 46% (95%CI 0.35 to 0.56) and 24% (95%CI 0.16 to 0.34), respectively. The median duration was 180 days (95%CI 138 to 222). The COX regression model showed lymphodepletion to be the only influence factor of PFS.ConclusionsCD19 CART has a good clinical response rate in the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies. Lymphodepletion is the only important impact on the response rate and PFS. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.