ObjectiveTo explore the application effects of hand-sewn layered anastomosis (HS) and circular stapled anastomosis (CS) in inflatable mediastinal mirror synchronous laparoscopic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. MethodsPatients who underwent inflatable mediastinal mirror synchronous laparoscopic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from 2018 to 2019 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into a HS group and a CS group according to the anastomosis methods, and propensity score matching was used to match patients at a ratio of 1:1. The baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative indicators, CD4+/CD8+ immune index comparison, pain, various lung function indicators, incidence of short-term and long-term postoperative complications, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 153 patients were included, including 108 males and 45 females, with an average age of (61.81±5.18) years. After propensity score matching, 70 patients were included in each group. Compared with the CS group, the operation time was longer in the HS group [(107.10±8.25) min vs. (97.65±6.85) min, P<0.001]; the CD4+/CD8+ level was lower in the HS group 1-3 days after surgery; the pain score was higher, and various lung function indicators (forced expiratory volume in the first second, forced vital capacity, and one-second rate) were lower in the HS group 1-7 days after surgery; within 6 months after surgery, the incidence of anastomosis-related complications (anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic fistula, and gastroesophageal reflux) was lower in the HS group; and the quality of life score was higher in the HS group from 14 days to 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). ConclusionHS can reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic fistula, anastomotic stenosis, and gastroesophageal reflux, and improve the short-term quality of life of patients, but it has a longer operation time, more intense short-term postoperative pain, and may affect the early recovery of lung function. HS and CS are complementary, and the appropriate surgical method should be chosen according to the individual situation of the patient to achieve the maximum clinical benefit.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term follow-up results of inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of esophageal cancer.MethodsClinical data of 102 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy were enrolled in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods, including a single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy group (group A, n=59, 53 males and 6 females, aged 63.3±7.6 years, ranging from 45 to 75 years) and a video-assisted thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy group (group B, n=43, 35 males and 8 females, aged 66.7±6.7 years, ranging from 50-82 years). The short-term follow-up results of the two groups were compared.ResultsCompared with the group A, the rate of postoperative pulmonary complication of the group B was significantly lower (18.64% vs. 4.65%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other postoperative complications (P>0.05). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 96.61%, 89.83%, and 73.33%, respectively in the group A, and were 95.35%, 93.02%, and 79.17%, respectively in the group B. There was no significant difference in short-term survival rate after operation (P>0.05).ConclusionIn the treatment of esophageal cancer, the incidence of pulmonary complications of inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy is lower than that of traditional video-assisted thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy, and there is no significant difference in other postoperative complications or short-term survival rate between the two methods. Inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy for radical esophageal cancer is a relatively safe surgical method with good short-term curative effects, and long-term curative effects need to be further tested.
Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (IVMTE) and minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (MITE) in the treatment of esophageal cancer. MethodsThe Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed, Wanfang Database, VIP, and CNKI were searched. Literatures related to the short-term efficacy and safety of IVMTE and MITE in the treatment of esophageal neoplasms published from the establishment of the database to December 2023 were searched and meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan5.4. Quality of case control study or cohort study was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and quality of randomized controlled trial was assessed by Cochrane Handbook. Results A total of 14 studies (12 case control studies and 1 prospective cohort study wiht NOS score more than 7 points and 1 randomized controlled trial wiht low bias risk) were included, comprising 1 163 patients, with 525 in the IVMTE group and 638 in the MITE group. The results of meta-analysis revealed that the IVMTE group exhibited significantly shorter operative time [MD=−60.42, 95%CI (−83.78, −37.07), P<0.001] and postoperative hospital stay [MD=−2.44, 95%CI (−2.93, −1.94), P<0.01] compared to the MITE group. Moreover, intraoperative blood loss [MD=−34.67, 95%CI (−59.11, −10.23), P=0.005], three-day postoperative drainage [MD=−286.66, 95%CI (−469.93, −103.40), P=0.002], incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection [OR=0.38, 95%CI (0.26, 0.56), P<0.001], lung leakage rate [OR=0.12, 95% CI (0.02, 0.63), P=0.01] and overall complication rate [MD=0.41, 95%CI (0.22, 0.75), P=0.004] were all lower in the IVMTE group compared to those in the MITE group. However, the MITE technique demonstrated superiority over IVMTE regarding intraoperative lymph dissection number [MD=−3.52, 95%CI (−6.36, –0.68), P=0.02] and intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve injury [OR=1.78, 95%CI (1.22, 2.60), P=0.003]. No significant difference was observed between both methods concerning anastomotic fistula. Conclusion Compared to MITE, IVMTE has advantages such as shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, less postoperative drainage within 3 days, and a lower incidence of pulmonary complications. In terms of laryngeal recurrent nerve injury and lymphatic dissection, MITE operation offers more benefits.