Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of new “One-Stitch” ureterovesical anastomosis to that of the classic Lich-Gregoir method. Methods From January 2002 to December 2004, 445 patients suffering from uremia due to chronic nephritis were treated with renal transplantation. Among them, 121 patients were operated with our new modified ureteroneocystostomy technique (the new One-Stitch group), and 324 patients were operated with Lich-Gregoir technique (the Lich-Gregoir group). In the new One-Stitch group, there were 79 males and 42 females, aged 20-62 years (35.7 years on average). The course of the disease was 2-11 years (2.7 years on average). In the Lich-Gregoir group, there were 211 males and 113 females, aged 19-65 years (33.9 years on average). The disease course was 1-14 years (2.3 years on average). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, proportion of genders, primary diseases and course of the disease (P gt; 0.05). The operative time, the ureteral compl ications and non-ureteral compl ications were compared between the two groups after the renal transplantation. Results The operative time for the new One-Stitch and Lich-Gregoir techniques was (8.7 ± 1.1) minutes and (22.4 ± 5.1) minutes, indicating the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). All recipients were followed up for 3-5 years. In the new One-Stitch group, there were 5 patients with leakage of urine, 15 with gross hematuria, 4 with ureteral obstruction and 28 with urinary system infection. Symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux and stone formation were not observed in this group. In the Lich-Gregoir group, there were 17 patients with leakage of urine, 12 with gross hematuria, 13 with ureteral obstruction, 86 with urinary system infection, 6 with symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux and 2 with stones. In the new One-Stitch group, the incidence rate of compl ications of gross hematuria was 12.4%, which was significantly different from 3.7% in the Lich-Gregoir group (P lt; 0.05). The incidence rates of ureteral compl ications in the Lich-Gregoir and the new One-Stitch groups were 19.8% and 15.4%, respectively. The difference was not significant (P gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groupsin incidence rate of urinary system infection, delayed recovery of kidney function after kidney transplantation and rejectionreaction (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The new One-Stitch group has no significant difference in ureteral compl ications ompared with the Lich-Gregoir group, and has become a preferential ureterovesical reimplantation technique because of its simple and has convenient operation.
Objective To approach the questions of donation after cardiac death （DCD） and transplantation through analyzing the DCD cases in this hospital. Methods The organs were obtained from 4 DCD from 2010 to 2011 in this hospital， the clinical data of DCD were analyzed retrospectively. Results Seven renal transplantations and 3 liver transplantations were performed. Donor warm ischemic time was 10-40 min. The liver and left kidney of the first DCD donator （Maastricht categoryⅣ） were eliminated through biopsy. One patient exhibited delayed graft function of kidney from the first DCD，the nephrectomy had to be done on day 7 after operation due to renal allograft rupture. Nine patients received 3 livers and 6 kidneys from the other 3 DCD donators （Maastricht categoryⅢ），whose patients were alive with excellent graft function. Conclusions The use of controlled DCD （Maastricht categoryⅢ） might be an effective way to increase the number of organs available for transplantation because that it might obtain satisfactory transplant outcomes and acceptable postoperative complications. The widespread implementation of controlled DCD in China should be encouraged.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of donation after citizen death (DCD) kidney transplantations performed in Sichuan.MethodsThe data of 97 cases of DCD kidney transplantations performed in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2012 and March 2016 was retrospectively reviewed. The 53 donors were aged from 7 months to 54 years (with a median of 28 years, and lower quartile of 15 years and upper quartile of 45 years), including 40 males and 13 females; the causes of death included craniocerebral trauma in 21 cases, craniocerebral tumor in 12 cases, cerebrovascular accident in 15 cases, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in 4 cases, and hydrocephalus in 1 case. The 97 recipients were aged from 18 to 66 years (with a median of 39 years, and lower quartile of 30 years and upper quartile of 44 years), including 71 males and 26 females. The recipients were classified into C-Ⅰ (n=36) and C-Ⅲ (n=61) according to type of donation. The baseline and perioperative situation of the donors and recipients, and the postoperative kidney function, infection, recipient survival and kidney survival of the recipients were analyzed.ResultsAfter transplantation, none of primary graft nonfunction occurred but delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in 26 cases. There were no significant differences in creatinine level between C-Ⅰ and C-Ⅲ recipients at 1 week [(226.71±187.46) vs. (249.94±249.84) μmol/L, P=0.636], 1 month [(136.32±63.34) vs. (157.37±147.83) μmol/L, P=0.428], 3 months [(110.51±25.26) vs. (115.02±36.60) μmol/L, P=0.527] and 12 months [(103.42±21.57) vs. (104.18±39.36) μmol/L, P=0.911] after transplantation, as well as acute rejection [13.9% vs. 19.7%, P=0.469] and complications at early time after transplantation. There were no significant differences in 1-year recipient survival rate (91.7% vs. 93.4%) and 1-year kidney survival rate (100.0% vs. 91.8%) between C-Ⅰ and C-Ⅲ recipients.ConclusionDCD kidney transplantation has excellent short-term outcomes despite a high incidence of early DGF, and may represent another potential method to safely expand the donor pool.
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) between Tibetan and Han recipients.MethodsPatients greater than 18 years old, who had received the first ABO-compatible KT between April 2006 and March 2017, were retrospectively included. A propensity score matching (PSM) of Tibetans to Hans was performed by 1∶3 ratio. Survival, renal function and adverse events of the two groups were compared.ResultsOf the 1 820 patients who fit the screening criteria, 123 Tibetans and 357 Hans were included after PSM. The median follow-up time was 48 months. There was no statistically significant difference in death-censored grafts survival (P=0.061) or patients survival (P=0.440) between the two groups. The serum creatinine was higher in Tibetans than that in Hans within one year after KT (P<0.05), and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in Tibetans than that in Hans within 5 years after KT (P<0.05), but no difference thereafter (P>0.05). The incidence of delayed graft function in Tibetan patients after operation was higher than that in Han patients (4.9% vs. 1.4%, P=0.037), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of acute rejection, infection, reoperation, or cancer between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionTibetans receiving KT achieve excellent and comparable long-term graft and patient survival to Hans, with similar long-term graft function.
ObjectiveTo conduct a Meta-analysis to determine the clinical effect of protocol biopsy (PB)-monitored therapy after renal transplantation.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Standards Database and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals were searched for trials comparing the efficacy of timely intervention under PB surveillance with the conventional treatment. The quality of included studies was assessed and Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSix randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria, including 698 cases. No significant difference was found between the PB group and the control group in 1-year [relative risk (RR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.97, 1.01), P=0.39] and 2-year recipient survival rate [RR=1.00, 95%CI (0.97, 1.02), P=0.72]. Graft survival rate after 1 year [RR=1.01, 95%CI (0.99, 1.04), P=0.29] and 2 years [RR=1.02, 95%CI (0.99, 1.06), P=0.19] were also statistically similar. No statistical difference was found in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups [mean difference (MD)=0.45 mL/(min·1.73 m2), 95%CI (–3.77, 4.67) mL/(min·1.73 m2), P=0.83]. Renal function of PB group, monitored by serum creatinine, was superior to the control group [MD=–0.46 mg/dL, 95%CI (–0.63, –0.29) mg/dL, P<0.000 01]. No statistical difference was found in infection between the two groups [RR=1.23, 95%CI (0.69, 2.19), P=0.48].ConclusionsOur study did not suggest PB for every kidney transplantation recipient. However, long-term randomized controlled trials with larger sample size would be necessary to determine whether PB was effective for specific populations.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based treatment plan for a patient with hepatitis C after kidney transplantation with combination of interferon-α and ribavirin. Methods Based on an adequate assessment of the patient’ s condition and using the principle of PICO, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), PubMed (1995 to March 2009), and CHKD (1995 to 2008.12). Results Eighteen studies were identified including 17 in English (5 case reports, 11 cohort studies, and 1 meta–analysis) and 1 in Chinese. According to the current evidence as well as the patient’ s clinical condition and preference, PEG-IFNα-2b 50 µg /week plus ribavirin 600 mg/day was given to the patient for 6 months. Conclusion Evidence-based approaches help us to prepare the anti-viral therapy plan and will improve the assessment of the efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal from target-of-rapamycin-inhibitor(TOR-I)-based immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, SCI, CBM and The Cochrane Library to screen randomized controlled trials (RCT) of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal from target-of-rapamycin-inhibitor-(TOR-I)-based immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. The search was updated in Semptember 2009. The quality of the included trials was assessed. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results A total of 14 reports from 10 RCTs were identified. Five RCTs were graded A and five graded B. The meta-analyses indicated: RR (95%CI) values of the 1, 2, 4-year acute rejection rates were 1.64 (1.19, 2.27), 1.53 (1.06, 2.22) and 1.21 (0.73, 1.98), respectively; RD (95%CI) values of 1, 2, 4-year patient survival rates were – 0.01 (– 0.02, 0.01), – 0.00 (– 0.03, 0.02) and 0.03 (– 0.01, 0.08), respectively; RD (95%CI) values of 1, 2, 4-year graft survival rates were 0.00 (– 0.02, 0.02), 0.00 (– 0.03, 0.04) and 0.07 (0.01, 0.12), respectively; and glomerular filtration rate WMD was 9.50 and 95%CI 2.96 to 16.03. Conclusion Based on the current evidence, compared to CNI, CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation could be advantageous for renal function. One-year acute rejection rate and 4-year graft survival rate increase. One-year patient/graft survival and fouryear acute rejection rate remain virtually unvariable. The long-term results need further confirmation.
ObjectivesTo establish statistical analysis and result reporting model for evaluation of the applicability of the clinical guidelines. We conducted empirical study for clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of renal transplantation rejection in China.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted to select 16 medical institutions in China which had carried out kidney transplantations. In each medical institution, 6 to 8 clinicians from the kidney transplantation department or related departments were selected to complete the questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was carried out for characteristics of evaluators, scores of each dimension, access to guidelines and factors affecting implementation. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Nemenyi test were used for multi-group comparison and pairwise comparison. Multiple linear regression with stepwise strategy were used to screen out the association factors.ResultsIn this survey, 128 questionnaires were distributed, in which 105 valid questionnaires were collected, and the recovery rate was 82.03%. The subjects of this survey were all kidney transplant clinicians from public tertiary hospitals, with an average 10.95 years of working time. The results showed the accessibility score was lowest and the acceptability score was highest. The results of multi-group comparison and multiple linear regression analysis showed that familiarity with the guidelines was the influencing factor of each score (P<0.05). The guidelines were primarily obtained from biomedical literature database (73.3%), academic journals (55.2%) and academic conferences (55.2%). Among the evaluators, 44 (41.9%) believed that there were implementation obstacles in the guidelines, among which 40 (38.1%) believed that implementation obstacles were environmental factors.ConclusionsThe applicability of clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of renal transplantation rejection in China is adequate. However, the publicity of the guideline requires improvement. As the guideline is updated, consideration should be given to including access to the guideline, adding free public information promotion, and familiarizing clinicians with the guidelines through training programs to promote application of the guideline.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients after kidney transplantation underwent immunosuppression therapy. Methods Clinical data of 6 patients (including 4 males and 2 females aged from 27 to 66 years) undergoing cardiac surgery after kidney transplantation with immunosuppression between January 2011 and October 2013 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Two patients underwent off pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 3 patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 1 patient underwent mitral valve replacement. The interval between kidney transplantation and cardiac operation was 8.5±1.7 years (range, 6-10 years). ResultsAll the operations were performed successfully without in-hospital death and complications. Operation time was 237.0±93.0 min. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 101.3±16.7 min. Aortic cross-clamping time was 75.6±9.7 min. in-hospital stay was 17±6 d. There was a statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative left ventricle ejection fraction (63.5%±4.5% vs. 56.5%±5.8%, P < 0.05), as well as preoperative and postoperative left ventricular enddiastolic diameter (54.5±8.5 mm vs. 43.7±6.8 mm, P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels (103.7±15.1μmol/L vs. 106.6±34.7μmol/L, P > 0.05). The mean follow-up time of the 6 patients was 4-15 months. The follow-up rate was 100%. All the patients were in cardiac function NYHA classⅠ-Ⅱ. And the quality of life was improved. ConclusionCardiac operations for kidney transplant recipients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment are effective and safe as long as appropriate perioperative treatment are taken.
目的 研究无创通气(NIPPV)治疗对肾移植术后巨细胞病毒(CMV)肺炎患者的疗效。方法 1998年1月~2005年12月间入住中山大学附属第一医院内科重症监护病房(MICU)的78例肾移植术后CMV肺炎患者，根据是否接受无创通气治疗而分为非NIPPV组和NIPPV组，比较两组患者在接受有创机械通气比例、病死率、住院时间及并发症等方面的差异。对52例NIPPV组患者，比较无创通气治疗前后生命体征及血气分析指标的变化。结果 NIPPV组与非NIPPV组相比，接受有创机械通气比例(30.8％ 比80.8％)、医院获得性肺炎发生率（32.7％ 比61.5％)及病死率(30.8％ 比57.7％)较低，两组比较均有显著性差异(P均lt;0.05)；而住院时间、气压伤发生率无显著差异。NIPPV组患者无创通气治疗后患者呼吸频率有所减慢，动脉血pH值逐渐降低，PaCO2水平缓慢上升，PaO2、PaO2 ／FiO2及SaO2明显升高，两组比较均有显著差异(P均lt;0.05)。而无创通气治疗前后心率、血压的变化则无明显规律。结论 NIPPV治疗能够改善肾移植术后CMV肺炎患者的低氧血症，缓解呼吸窘迫症状，降低有创机械通气治疗比例及医院获得性肺炎的发生率，从而降低病死率。用无创通气治疗巨细胞病毒肺炎值得在临床上推广使用。