Objective To compare the differences of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) between trans-apical and trans-femoral groups in the treatment of mitral regurgitation. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on the patients who underwent TEER surgery at Tianjin Chest Hospital from February 2023 to October 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: trans-apical approach group and trans-femoral approach group. Baseline conditions, perioperative and postoperative 6-month survival status, and echocardiographic follow-up indicators were collected and compared between the groups. The primary endpoint indicators were all-cause mortality and device success rate. Secondary endpoint indicators included catheterization duration, heart failure readmission rate, and incidence of moderate or greater mitral regurgitation. Results A total of 33 patients were included, with 16 in the trans-femoral approach group and 17 in the trans-apical approach group. The average age was (69.85±7.86） years, and 17 patients (51.5%) were male. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in demographic characteristics, STS scores, comorbidities (except for diabetes), and laboratory tests. The proportion of patients with preoperative heart function≥grade Ⅲ was higher in the trans-apical approach group (88.2% vs. 43.8%, P=0.007), and the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was smaller [(58.41±7.13）mm vs. (65.81±11.58) mm, P=0.033]. The catheterization operation time was shorter in the trans-apical approach group [40.00 (30.00, 61.00) min vs. 74.00 (56.25, 108.25) min, P=0.002]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in all-cause mortality, device success rate, and heart failure readmission rate. Conclusion TEER surgeries via different approaches might have the same safety and efficacy. The trans-apical TEER surgery is simpler to operate, has a shorter learning curve, and is easier for beginners to master.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of low-dose inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in the treatment of severe hypoxemia after Sun’s operation. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing Sun’s operation for acute Type A aortic dissection in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received conventional treatment before November 2021 were enrolled as a control group. After November 2021, iNO was used in our hospital, and the patients who received iNO as an iNO group. The preoperative clinical baseline data, perioperative clinical data and oxygenation index were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 54 patients were included in the control group, including 45 males and 9 females, with an average age of 53.0±10.9 years. A total of 27 patients were included in the iNO group, including 21 males and 6 females, with an average age of 52.0±10.6 years. The preoperative body mass index of the two groups was greater than 25 kg/m2, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein were significantly higher than normal level, but there was no statistical difference between the groups (P＞0.05). There were no statistical differences in intraoperative data between the two groups (P＞0.05). The iNO group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative ICU stay, and postoperative hospital stay than the control group (P<0.001). After 12 h of iNO treatment, hypoxic condition improved obviously, oxygenation indices in 12 h, 24 h, 36 h,48 h, 60 h and 72 h in the iNO group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The treatment of severe hypoxemia after Sun’s surgery with low-dose of iNO is safe and effective, can significantly improve oxygenation function, and has significant advantages in shortening ventilator use time, postoperative ICU stay and postoperative hospital stay, but it is not significant in changing postoperative mortality.