ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of long and short proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of type A2.3 intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFF). Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with type A2.3 IFF admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the length of PFNA nail used in the operation, they were divided into long nail group (PFNA nail length>240 mm, 24 cases) and short nail group (PFNA nail length≤240 mm, 30 cases). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, fracture side, body mass index, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative reduction quality score, fracture healing, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of patients at 1 year after operation. According to the relationship between the fracture line of type A2.3 IFF and the lesser trochanter, the two groups of patients were divided into type Ⅰ(the fracture line extends to the level of the lesser trochanter), type Ⅱ(the fracture line extends to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and type Ⅲ (the fracture line extends to more than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and the postoperative stability and internal fixator loosening of each subtype were evaluated. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in short nail group were significantly less than those in long nail group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative reduction quality score between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 13.5 months. The postoperative stability score of short nail group was significantly lower than that of long nail group (P<0.05). The Harris score in the long nail group was significantly higher than that in the short nail group at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in Harris score grading between the two groups (P>0.05). Complications occurred in 3 cases of the long nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 2 cases of loose internal fixator), and 7 cases of the short nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 6 cases of loose internal fixator). Neither group had any anterior femoral arch damage, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of type Ⅲ patients was relatively small and not included in the statistics; there was no significant difference in the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixator loosening between the long and short nail groups in type Ⅰ patients (P>0.05). In type Ⅱ patients, the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixation loosening in the long nail group were significantly better than those in the short nail group (P<0.05).Conclusion Long PFNA fixation for type A2.3 IFF has longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss, but the overall stability of fracture is better after operation. For type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter, long PFNA is used for fixation, although the surgical trauma is large, but the postoperative stability is better than that of short PFNA; for type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to the lesser trochanter, there is no significant difference in postoperative stability between long and short PFNAs.
Objective To investigate the effect of treatment with proximal femoral nail (PFN) on femur intertrochanteric fractures in the old. Methods A retrospective study of 62 patients with femur intertrochantericfractures treated with PFN from October 2001 to September 2003 was carried out.The data of operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, wound drainage, postoperative complications, healing time, and hip function were recordedand compared with previous literature so as to evaluate the effect. Results All patients were followed up for 8-22 month(13.6 months on average). Intraoperative fracture occurred again in 2 cases. Two patients died of brain embolism and pulmonary infection respectively. Heterogeneous ossification occurred in 2 cases. Hip varus occurred in 1 case. Extra hip anteversion occurred in 1 case. The effect of other cases was satisfactory. The operative time was 76.5±29.1 min, the mean blood loss was 385.7±98.4 ml, the wound drainage was 45.5±21.7 ml, and the healing time was 13.2±3.8 weeks. According to the Sanders post-trauma hip function assessing system, the excellent and good rate was 89.6%. Conclusion The application of PFN is characterized by short operative time, less blood loss, stable fixation, so it is an effective way to treat femur intertrochanteric fracture in the old.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall in elderly patients. Methods Between May 2009 and August 2012, 69 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall were treated. Fractures were fixed with PFNA in 36 patients (PFNA group), and with LCP in 33 patients (LCP group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, side of fracture, and fracture AO type between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, time for ambulation, and early (within 3 months) and late (more than 12 months) complications were compared. Fracture healing was assessed according to X-ray reexamination, the function of the hip joint was assessed according to the Harris hip scoring system. Results The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time for ambulation of PFNA group were significantly less than those of LCP group (P < 0.05), but the fluoroscopy frequency of PFNA group was significantly more than that of LCP group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in total blood loss between 2 groups (t=-1.686, P=0.096). The patients were followed up 12-24 months in PFNA group and 15-30 months in LCP group. The X-ray reexamination revealed fracture healing at (12.667±2.527) weeks in patients of PFNA group, and at (13.364±1.194) weeks in the others of LCP group except 1 case of nonunion, showing no significant difference (t=-1.443, P=0.154). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between PFNA group (84.611±7.076) and LCP group (81.785±7.500) at 12 months after operation (t=1.626, P=0.109). The early complication rate and late complication rate were 16.7% (6/36) and 5.6% (2/36) in PFNA group and were 9.1% (3/33) and 9.1% (3/33) in LCP group, all showing no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.871, P=0.481; χ2=0.320, P=0.665). Conclusion Both PFNA and LCP have good effectiveness in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with the lateral unsubstantial femoral wall in the elderly patients. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Objective To compare the effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Methods A total of 72 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were enrolled between December 2011 and December 2014. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into PFNA group (38 cases) and DHS group (34 cases). The operation time, perioperative blood loss, postoperative weight-bearing time, Harris score were compared between the two groups. Results All cases were followed up for 5–24 months (mean, 13.5 months). The operation time in PFNA group was shorter than that in DHS group [(40.25±24.23) vs. (72.65±34.65) minutes], the perioperative blood loss in PFNA group was less than that in DHS group [(136±56) vs. (256±102) mL], the postoperative weight-bearing time in PFNA group was earlier than that in DHS group [(5.24±4.52) vs. (15.69±6.78) days], and the Harris score in PFNA group was higher than that in DHS group (80.23±10.26 vs. 54.75±12.37) ; the differences above were all statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture and osteoporosis treated with PFNA have shorter operation time, less wounds, better hip function, and earlier weight-bearing than the patients treated with DHS; the surgical method can improve the patient′ life quality.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP) for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. MethodsWe respectively analyzed the clinical data of 116 senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated between October 2008 and March 2014. Among them, 60 were treated with PFNA, and 56 were treated with LPFP. We compared the two groups of patients in terms of operating time, surgical blood loss, surgical complications, walking exercise time, fracture healing time and joint function recovery. ResultsA total of 115 patients had regular follow-up from 12 to 24 months (averaging 15.7 months). One patient died. The operating time was (83.26±14.81) minutes in PFNA group and (102.58±15.31) minutes in LPFP group. The surgical blood loss was (202.16±33.14) mL in PFNA group and (255.80±45.92) mL in LPFP group. The walking exercise time was (1.80±0.91) weeks in PFNA group and (3.48±3.03) weeks in LPFP group. The fracture healing time was (11.80±2.26) weeks in PFNA group and (12.14±2.21) weeks in LPFP group. The postoperative Harris score for hip joint was 84.56±9.55 in PFNA group and 82.47±9.22 in LPFP group. There were statistical differences in operating time, surgical blood loss and walking exercise time (P<0.05), while no statistical differences were found in fracture healing time and postoperative Harris score for hip joint (P>0.05). ConclusionPFNA and LPFP are effective methods for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly people, but PFNA has a shorter operating time, less surgical blood loss and earlier walking exercise time.
ObjectiveTo investigate the lateral wall protection skills for aged femoral intertrochanteric fractures fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). MethodsSixty aged patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated with PFNA between March 210 and January 2011.According to Evans classification,31 were type Ⅰc,18 were Ⅰd,and 11 were type Ⅱ.Several skills were applied to prevent the breaking of the lateral wall.Post-operative complications,bone union and recovery of hip function were recorded. ResultsThe patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months.All fractures were healed without infection or failure of internal fixation. ConclusionPFNA is a good choice for the clinical treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in aged patients.To obtain better clinical result,the lateral wall must be considered and well protected.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between May 2007 and May 2010, 63 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were treated, and fractures were fixed with PFNA in 31 patients (PFNA group) and with DHS in 32 patients (DHS group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, and fracture type between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention. The incision length, operation time, and blood loss in PFNA group were significantly less than those in DHS group (P lt; 0.05). The averagefollow-up time was 13.6 months in PFNA group and was 13.8 months in DHS group. The fracture heal ing time was (11.80 ± 1.32) weeks in PFNA group and was (12.21 ± 1.26) weeks in DHS group, showing no significant difference (t=1.23, P=0.29). The complication rate was 0 in PFNA group and was 12.5% (4/32) in DHS group, showing no significant difference (P=0.06). After 1 year, Harris hip score of PFNA group (86.55 ± 10.32) was higher than that of DHS group (80.36 ±11.18) (t=2.28, P=0.03). Conclusion There are two surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patient: PFNA and DHS, and each has advantages; for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, PFNA treatment is the first choice.
Objective To investigate the operative method and to evaluate the cl inical outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in treating reverse obl ique fractures of intertrochanteric region of the femur. Methods From January 2007 to February 2008, 30 cases of reverse obl ique fractures of intertrochanteric region of the femur were treated by closed reduction and fixation with PFNA, including 14 males and 16 females and aging 40-88 years old with an average of 68.6years old. All patients had closed fractures. According to AO classification, there were 6 cases of 31-A3.1 type, 7 cases of 31-A3.2 type and 17 cases of 31-A3.3 types. The time from injury to operation was 2-14 days (with an average of 5.3 days). All 31-A3.1 and 31-A3.2 type farctures and 9 cases of AO 31-A3.3 type fractures were fixed with the standard PFNA, and 8 cases of 31-A3.3 type fractures with the PFNA-long. The cl inical and radiological examinations were done at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after operation. The cl inical outcomes were evaluated according to the Sanders scoring. Results Iatrogenic fracture of femoral shaft occurred in 1 case; no additional procedures were appl ied as fracture kept favorable stabil ity. Superficial infection occurred in 1 case at 5 days after operation, wound healed after dressing change and intravenous antibiotic therapy. Other wounds healed by first intention. All cases were followed up for 12-19 months (mean 14.1 months). All fractures healed uneventfully after 12-30 weeks (mean 16.2 weeks). Five patients complained of hip pain, 2 patients had lateral leg pain, and the pain was el iminated after symptomatic treatment. One case compl icated by ipsilateral fracture of the tibial plateau had functional disturbance of knee, and one case compl icated by ipsilateral fracture of the acetabulum and pelvis had functional disturbance of hip, and the function was improved after functional exercise. No compl ications such as cut-out or breakage of the implants occurred. According to Sanders criteria, the cl inical results were excellent in 22 cases, good in 6 cases, and poor in 2 cases. The excellent and good rate was 93.3%. Conclusion PFNA is an effective treatment method for reverse obl ique fractures of intertrochanteric region of the femur, with a high rate of bone union, minor soft tissue damage, early functional exercise and acceptable compl icationrelated to implant.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness and complications of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN nail in treatment of elderly intertrochanteric fractures. MethodsA total of 178 patients with intertrochanteric fractures between January 2011 and June 2013 were enrolled. PFNA was used in 100 cases (PFNA group) and InterTAN in 78 cases (InterTAN group). No significant difference was found in gender, age, side of fracture, cause of injury, fracture classification, and time between injury and operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, postoperative complications, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, and Harris score were compared between 2 groups to evaluate the effectiveness. ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time in PFNA group were significantly less than those in InterTAN group (P<0.05). The hospitalization time had no significant difference between the 2 groups (t=1.270, P=0.206). Primary healing was obtained in the others except 2 cases having red and swollen in each group respectively. Ninety-two cases of PFNA group and 63 cases of InterTAN group were followed up 11 months on average (range, 8-16 months). In the patients who were lost, there were 4 deaths in PFNA group and 3 deaths in InterTAN group. The complication rate was 4.2% in PFNA group (2 cases of deep venous thrombosis and 2 cases of hip varus) and was 4.5% in InterTAN group (1 case of deep venous thrombosis and 2 cases of hip varus), showing no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.077, P=0.782). X-ray showed that the fracture line disappeared; no complications of malunion, bone nonunion, infection, and loosening of internal fixation occurred. The patients could walk normally. The healing time and Harris hip scores at last follow-up showed no significant difference between 2 groups (t=1.324, P=0.188; t=1.594, P=0.113). ConclusionPFNA is suitable for elderly patients with osteoporosis in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture; InterTAN can be a better choice for younger patients or patients with unstable fracture.
ObjectiveTo investigate the association between the tip apex distance (TAD) and migration of helical blade in the femoral head of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures.MethodsA retrospective study of intertrochanteric fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) between June 2015 and June 2018 was performed. There were 32 males and 55 females with an average age of 84.7 years (range, 80-101 years). All of them were unilateral fresh closed intertrochanteric fractures caused by low energy injury. According to AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, 33 cases belonged to type 31-A1, 35 cases to type 31-A2, and 19 cases to type 31-A3. The time interval from injury to operation was 1-16 days (mean, 3.7 days). The TAD was measured according to immediate postoperative X-ray films. The cases were divided into two groups: group A with TAD less than 20 mm and group B with TAD greater than 20 mm. The difference of fracture healing and migration of helical blade between the two groups were observed.ResultsAccording to the TAD value immediately after operation, 49 patients in group A had TAD of 8.9-19.7 mm, with an average of 18.6 mm; 38 patients in group B had TAD of 20.1-41.4 mm, with an average of 27.7 mm. The 87 patients were followed up for an average of 11.7 months, ranging from 4 to 28 months. Three cases (all in group B) underwent screw blade cutting and displacement, which resulted in internal fixation failure, including 1 case with femoral head cut upward and 2 cases with femoral head penetrated inward. The remaining 84 cases had bone healing without internal fixation related complications such as fracture of internal fixator and fracture of femoral shaft. There was significant difference in the incidence of internal fixation failure between group A and group B (P=0.049). ConclusionReducing the TAD value of helical blade appropriately (15-20 mm) in PFNA internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture patients over 80 years old can increase initial stability without increasing the risk of helical blade migration.