In order to promote the effective development of hospital day surgery mode, a construction method of information management platform that meets the characteristics of day surgery mode is presented. By analyzing the business process of the day surgery mode, the system architecture of the information platform is given; according to the difficulty of the surgical scheduling, the two-stage surgical scheduling algorithm based on the ranking theory is given; by analyzing the day surgery data statistically, a multi-angle surgical index analysis module is provided. The information management of the day surgery mode has been realized, and the work efficiency has been improved. A reasonable day surgery information platform construction can help to optimize the daytime surgical procedure and promote the smooth development of day surgery.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are highly sophisticated deep learning models pre-trained on massive datasets, with ChatGPT representing a prominent application of LLMs in the field of generative models. Since the release of ChatGPT at the end of 2022, generative chatbots have become widely employed across various medical disciplines. As a crucial discipline guiding clinical practices, the usage of generative chatbots like ChatGPT in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is gradually increasing. However, the potential, challenges, and intricacies of their application in the domain of EBM remain unclear. This paper aims to explore and discuss the prospects, challenges, and considerations associated with the application of ChatGPT in the field of EBM through a review of relevant literature. The discussion spans four aspects: evidence generation, synthesis, assessment, dissemination, and implementation, providing researchers with insights into the latest developments and future research suggestions.
ObjectiveWe constructed a real-world evidence evaluation system to provide reference for obtaining high-quality evidence in evidence-based medicine.MethodsThrough the investigation and analysis of the key factors influencing the real-world research evidence, combined with domestic and foreign literature and evaluation tools, we preliminarily constructed the indicators of the real-world evidence evaluation system, then consulted experts in related fields by the Delphi method, modified and determined the final evaluation indicators. ResultsThe indicators of the final real-world evidence evaluation system included 40 items. The recovery efficiencies of the two rounds of expert consultation were 88.2% and 100%; The expert coordination coefficients were 0.174 (P<0.001) and 0.189 (P<0.001). After the second round of consultation, the mean of Likert scale in the range of 3.73~4.93, and the coefficient of variation varied in the range of 0.05~0.21. ConclusionThe real-world evidence evaluation system constructed in this study has certain reliability and scientificity, which can provide a basis and help for the transformation of real-world research into high-quality evidence.
Objective To evaluate the quality of Chinese literatures on the methodology of D-dimer diagnostic test. Method We searched CNKI (1994 to 2006) and CBM (1978 to 2006) for articles involving the diagnostic tests of D-dimer for coagulation disorders. Result A total of 63 relevant articles were retrieved and 7 were included in our review. Only one of these provided useful data on two two table for the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions Few studies on the diagnostic tests of D-dimer have been performed and publ ished in China, all of poor quality. Further studies should focus on clinical diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, so as to provide more valuable information for readers.
Objective To evaluate the quality of undergraduate medical education so as to provide useful and effective feedback information for medical schools and to extend GMER (Global Minimum Essential Requirements in Medical Education) standard. Methods Through questionnaires, 205 resident doctors self-evaluated their abilities or qualities based on GMER standard. The unconditioned logistic regression model was used for data analysis. Results Graduates from undergraduate medical programs mastered the abilities or qualities required in 4 GMER domains i.e. “professional values, attitudes, behaviors and ethics”, “clinical skills”, “communication skills”, and “scientific foundation of medicine”. But the abilities or qualities required in “information management”, “population health and health systems” as well as “critical thinking and research” domains have not been obtained. The main factors that affected the evaluation results were corresponding training to the essentials, learner’s attitude, teaching models and teaching hours. Conclusion Educational sectors should adjust curriculum design so as to help medical students master the abilities required in the 3 domains stated above. Medical schools should conduct some educational research to formulate the most beneficial teaching methods, and import advanced ones to raise the quality of medical education in China.
Focusing on research quality is a crucial aspect of modern evidence-based medical practice, providing substantial evidence to underpin clinical decision-making. The increase in real-world studies in recent years has presented challenges, with varying quality stemming from issues such as data integrity and researchers’ expertise levels. Although systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential references for clinical decisions, their reliability is contingent upon the quality of the primary studies. Making clinical decisions based on inadequate research poses inherent risks. With the lack of a specialized tool for evaluating the quality of real-world studies within systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the Gebrye team has introduced a new assessment tool - QATSM-RWS. Comprising 5 modules and 14 items, this tool aims to improve real-world research evaluation. This article aims to elaborate on the tool’s development process and content, using this tool to evaluate a published real-world study as an example and providing valuable guidance for domestic researchers utilizing this innovative tool.
Objective To evaluate the quality of controlled trials on 131I therapy for thyroglobulin positive and radioactive iodine negative metastases（131I WBS-/Tg+）. Methods We electronically searched MEDLINE (1966 to Mar. 2004), EMBASE (1984 to 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, CENTRAL (Issue 2, 2004), CBMdisc (1978 to 2004) and CNKI (1994 to 2004), and handsearched 5 radiotherapy and endocrinology journals (Jan. 1980 to Apr. 2003). The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by using quality assessment criteria of the Cochrane systematic review guideline. Results Three non-randomized controlled trials were included. One was historical controlled trial, and two prospective trials. The sample sizes of three trials were 26, 60 and 70 respectively without mentioning the calculation base. The comparability of baseline was mentioned but not comparable across the trials. No double blind studies were used in the assessment of 131I efficacy. The time of follow-up varied from 2 to 15 years. None studies mentioned the side effects of 131I therapy for 131I WBS-/Tg+ metastases. Only two studies applied statistical methods properly. Conclusions Problems about allocation of groups, double blind, sample size, and follow-up period continue to exist in published controlled trials. RCT or prospective controlled trials of high quality are urgently needed in order to define the efficacy and safety of 131I therapy for 131I WBS-/Tg+ metastases.
The current issue of air pollution has pushed the development of the corresponding observational air pollution studies. The World Health Organization has developed a new risk of bias (RoB) assessment instrument and a related guideline for assessing the risk of potential bias in observational air pollution studies. This study introduced the background, methods, uses, advantages and disadvantages, precautions, and usage scenarios of the RoB instrument. It is expected to provide researchers with corresponding quality evaluation tools when writing related systematic review and meta-analysis, which will also help provide reporting standards for observational air pollution studies, thereby improving the quality of studies.
Objective To systematically evaluate the quality of published pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines for neoplasms. Methods Datasets including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMbase were searched to collect pharmacoeconomics studies of Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms from the establishment of the database to September 30, 2022. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) and quality of health economics studies (QHES) were used to evaluate the reporting quality and methodological quality. Results A total of 25 studies were included, with an average CHEERS 2022 coincidence rate of 40.09% and an average QHES score of 53.2. Conclusion The quantity and quality of pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms are insufficient and flawed. It is suggested to strenthen the collaboration between scientific research institutions and hospitals and standardize the pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms to provide hygienic decision-making evidence for Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms.
National Center for Medical Service Administration of National Health and Family Planning Commission of China was established at the beginning of 2015. It is mainly in charge of developing and managing standards of medical technology and organizing their implementation, and giving technical guidance and consulting for evaluation of medical institutions. The foundation of the center fills in the blank of lacking central administrative department of the guideline development and evaluation. This paper introduces the definition and the function of clinical practice guideline, and analyzes the current situation, problems and challenges of domestic guidelines, and proposes some potential suggestions on improving the quality of Chinese guidelines from national level for promoting the standardization, scientification and transparency of clinical practice guidelines in China.