Objective To explore the clinical value of artificial intelligence (AI) quantitative parameters of pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGN) in predicting the degree of infiltration. Methods A retrospective analysis of 168 consecutive patients with 178 GGNs in our hospital from October 2019 to May 2021 was performed, including 43 males and 125 females, aged 21-78 (55.76±10.88) years. Different lesions of the same patient were analyzed as independent samples. Totally, 178 GGNs were divided into two groups, a non-invasive group (24 adenocarcinoma in situ and 77 minimally invasive adenocarcinoma), and an invasive group (77 invasive adenocarcinoma). We compared the difference of AI quantitative parameters between the two groups, and evaluated predictive valve by receiver operating characteristic curve and binary logistic regression model. Results (1) Except for the gender (P=0.115), the other parameters, such as maximal diameter [15.10 (11.50, 21.60) mm vs. 8.90 (7.65, 11.15) mm], minimum diameter [10.80 (8.85, 15.20) mm vs. 7.40 (6.10, 8.95) mm], proportion of consolidation/tumor ratio [13.58% (1.61%, 63.76%) vs. 0.00% (0.00%, 0.67%)], mean CT value [–347.00 (–492.00, –101.50) Hu vs. –598.00 (–657.50, –510.00) Hu], CT maximum value [40.00 (–40.00, 94.50) Hu vs. –218.00 (–347.00, –66.50) Hu], CT minimum value [–584.00 (–690.50, –350.00) Hu vs. –753.00 (–786.00, –700.00) Hu], danger rating (proportion of high-risk nodules, 92.2% vs. 66.3%), malignant probability [91.66% (85.62%, 94.92%) vs. 81.81% (59.98%, 90.29%)] and age (59.93±8.53 years vs. 52.04±12.10 years) were statistically significant between the invasive group and the non-invasive group (all P<0.001). (2) The highest predictive value of a single quantitative parameter was the maximal diameter (area under the curve=0.843), the lowest one was the risk classification (area under the curve=0.627), the combination of two among the three parameters (maximal diameter, mean CT value, and consolidation/tumor ratio) improved the predictive value entirely. (3) Logistic regression analysis showed that maximal diameter and mean CT value both were the independent risk factor for predicting invasive adenocarcinoma. (4) When the threshold of v was 1.775%, the diagnostic sensitivity of invasive adenocarcinoma was 0.753 and the specificity was 0.851. Conclusion AI quantitative parameters can effectively predict the degree of infiltration of GGNs and provide a reliable reference basis for clinicians.
Objective To explore the clinical value of artificial intelligence (AI) quantitative parameters in distinguishing pathological grades of stageⅠ invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). Methods Clinical data of patients with clinical stageⅠ IAC admitted to Yantaishan Hospital Affiliated to Binzhou Medical University from October 2018 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the 2021 WHO pathological grading criteria for lung adenocarcinoma, IAC was divided into gradeⅠ, grade Ⅱ, and grade Ⅲ. The differences in parameters among the groups were compared, and logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive efficacy of AI quantitative parameters for grade Ⅲ IAC patients. Parameters were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Three machine learning models were constructed based on these parameters to predict grade Ⅲ IAC and were internally validated to assess their efficacy. Nomograms were used for visualization. ResultsA total of 261 IAC patients were included, including 101 males and 160 females, with an average age of 27-88 (61.96±9.17) years. Six patients had dual primary lesions, and different lesions from the same patient were analyzed as independent samples. There were 48 patients of gradeⅠ IAC, 89 patients of grade Ⅱ IAC, and 130 patients of grade Ⅲ IAC. (1) Comparison among the three groups: the differences in parameters such as consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR), long diameter, short diameter, malignancy probability, CT average value, CT maximum value, CT minimum value, CT median value, CT standard deviation, kurtosis, skewness, and entropy were statistically significant (P<0.05). (2) Comparison between two groups: gradeⅠ and grade Ⅱ were combined and compared with grade Ⅲ, and univariate analysis showed that the differences in all variables except age were statistically significant (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis suggested that CTR and CT standard deviation were independent risk factors for identifying grade Ⅲ IAC, and the two were negatively correlated. (3) Pathological comparisons: no lymph node metastasis was found in gradeⅠpatients, two gradeⅡ patients were of lymph node metastasis with micro-papillary components, and 19 grade Ⅲ patients were of lymph node metastasis. Grade Ⅲ IAC exhibited advanced TNM staging, more pathological high-risk factors, higher lymph node metastasis rate, and higher proportion of advanced structure. (4) Correlation analysis: CTR was positively correlated with the proportion of advanced structures in all patients. This correlation was also observed in grade Ⅲ but not in gradeⅠand grade ⅡIAC. (5) CTR and CT median value were selected by using LASSO regression, and logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models were constructed and validated. Among them, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best predictive performance. Conclusion Cautious consideration should be given to grade Ⅲ IAC when CTR is higher than 39.48% and CT standard deviation is less than 122.75 HU. The XGBoost model based on combined CTR and CT median value has good predictive efficacy for grade Ⅲ IAC, aiding clinicians in making personalized clinical decisions.