The experience on management of abnormal blood vessels in 128 cases of donor kidney during the tailoring operation was reported. The various techniques used for different types of abnormal arteries and veins, and the critical points which should be paid attention to have been discussed. It was concluded that the multiple renal arteries should be treated in a single renal artery and anastomosed with internal iliac artery or/and external iliac artery. The appropriate management given to abnormal renal blood vessels during the tailoring operation may shorten the warm ishemia time, ensure the renal blood supply, reduce the renal vasular complication, and promote the recovery of renal function.
Studies of evidence-based medicine have provided much important evidence, clarified problems, and guided the clinical practice in the treatment of renal diseases. As examples, several therapeutic problems in renal hypertension, renal anemia and low protein diet for the patients with chronic kidney disease are discussed in this paper.
Objective To evaluate the safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) for rejection after renal transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Jun. 2004), EMBASE (1984 to Jun. 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004) and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979 to Jun. 2004). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MMF with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were included. The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.1.1 software. Results Twenty-Four RCTs comparing MMF (2 g/day or 3 g/day) with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were identified. The digest system morbidity of MMF group was higher than that of AZA group. The incidence of vomiting, bellyache and diarrhea of MMF 3 g/day group was statistical by higher than that of AZA group (P＜0.05). The cytom egalovirus (CMV) infection morbidity of MMF 3 g/day group during 6 months, 1 year and 2 years follow-up was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but for MMF 2 g/day group, this difference was only seen during 1 year follow-up. Leukopenia incidence of MMF 3g/day group was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but this difference was not seen in MMF 2 g/day group. Thrombocytopenia incidence of MMF 3 g/day group was lower than AZA group with statistical difference. For skin carcinoma morbidity, no statistical difference was found among MMF 3 g/day, MMF 2 g/day and AZA groups. Conclusions Compared with AZA, MMF represents higher digest system side-effects incidence, higher morbidity of leucopenia and CMV infection and lower incidence of thrombocytopenia. The dose-response relationship of adverse drug reaction is found.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases. It mainly involves joints, as well as extra-articular organs. The extra-articular manifestations (EAM) are more common in patients with severe active disease, and the mortality of RA patients with EAM is 2.5 times of RA patients without EAM. Renal damage is rare in EAM, which mainly includes renal damage associated with RA itself, renal amyloidosis, and drug-induced secondary renal damage. In recent years, researches on RA renal damage have gradually increased, and mainly focused on therapy and prognosis. The recent research progress of RA renal damage are summarized in this review.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. Method Searching: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM); identified the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and applied Revman 4.11 for statistical analyses. Results Twenty-two RCTs were identified, involving MMF and AZA for anti-rejection after renal transplantation. The data shown that MMF (2 g/d) was more beneficial than AZA in improving the graft survival rate of short periods and the long-term patient survival rate, but there was no statistical differences between MMF (3 g/d) with AZA. Whether in 6 months or in 1 year after renal transplantation, the use of MMF (2 g/d) or MMF (3 g/d) could markedly reduce the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection. Conclusions Comparing with AZA, MMF is a more potent immunosuppressive drug, and more efficient in reducing the acute rejection after renal transplantation. MMF can improve the graft and patient survival rate. The 2 gram per day is more acceptable.
In this paper, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and other relevant studies on surgical and adjuvant therapy following operative therapy in renal cancer were identified by searching the Guidelines International Network, ACP Journal Club, the Cochrane Library （Issue 3, 2005 ） , MEDLINE, EMBASE and CBMdisc （ from 1996 to Sept. 2005）. In operative therapy, we found no study comparing operative therapy with no treatment or adjuvant therapy alone; A meta-analysis of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer showed adjuvant therapy following nephrectomy was more effective than adjuvant therapy alone; a review comparing radical nephrectomy with nephron-sparing surgery in small-volume renal tumors found similar effectiveness between the two procedures. In the adjuvant therapy following nephrectomy, ten RCTs found adjuvant cytokine therapy （Interferon and Interleukin-2 ） and 5-FU not effective in the adjuvant setting, and could increase adverse reaction; Four RCTs found adjuvant vaccine therapy effective in the adjuvant setting with only a few side effects.
Cell senescence is a state of irreversible cell cycle arrest and simultaneously secretes inflammatory factors, chemokines and other senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which plays an important role in the progression of kidney diseases, metabolic diseases and other diseases. Renal tubular cell (RTC) senescence is a key cellular biological event in the progression of acute kidney injury (AKI). Senescent RTCs not only inhibit the regeneration and repair of AKI, but also release SASP to promote the progression of AKI. Inhibition of RTC senescence, targeted removal of senescent RTCs or promotion of senescent RTCs apoptosis could improve the prognosis of AKI, indicating that these methods have broad application prospects.
To establ ish a simple and stable cervical ectopic renal transplantation rat model that increase surgical successful rate. Methods A total of 208 male inbred Wistar rats (weighing 220-260 g) were randomly served as donors and recipients. The graft consisting of kidney, renal vein (RV) and renal artery (RA) was obtained, and perfused in situ. The donor RA was end-to-end anastomosed to the recipient left common carotid artery (CCA) by using of “sleeve” anastomosis,and the donor RV to the recipient right external jugular vein by using of “cuff” technique. The distal end of the ureter wasbrought out to form cervical cutaneous stomas. Results A total of 104 ectopic renal transplantations were performed in rats, including stages of the pre-experiment (62 operations) and experiment (42 operations). The success rates of the two stages were 80.6% and 95.2%, respectively. The causes of failure in the pre-experimental stage were anesthesia accidents, thrombosis of the arterial anastomosis, massive hemorrhage, air embol ism and phlebemphraxis. In the experimental stage, 2 rats died due to late anastomotic hemorrhage and thrombosis. The remaining 40 transplanted kidney survived more than 6 months. The time for surgery was (40 ± 6) minutes, the average time for donor surgery was (20 ± 5) minutes, the preparation time for the graft was (8 ± 2) minutes, the operative time for the recipient was (18 ± 3) minutes, including the time for the arterial anastomosis (5 ± 2) minutes and venous anastomosis (2 ± 1) minutes, the cold ischemia time of graft was (15 ± 3) minutes. Conclusion The cervical ectopic renal transplantation technique has the advantages of easy-and fast-to-perform, shorter operation and cold ischemia time, higher successful rate.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on improving depression, anxiety and quality of life in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, CENTRAL (Issue 8, 2016), Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycoINFO, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to Sep. 1st, 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which studied the effects of CBT on improving depression, anxiety and quality of life in patients with MHD. Literature screening, data extraction, and the risk of bias assessment of all eligible studies were conducted by two reviewers independently. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 14 RCTs involving 1 492 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that CBT could significantly improve the depression (SMD=–0.85, 95%CI –0.96 to –0.74,P<0.000 01), anxiety (SMD=–1.16, 95%CI –1.37 to –0.94,P<0.000 01), and quality of life (SMD=0.88, 95%CI 0.21 to 1.56,P=0.010) of MHD patients after 2 months' intervention; however, these effects were not been found within 2 months' intervention (allP values>0.05). Conclusion CBT is efficacious in improving MHD patients' depression, anxiety and quality of life after 2 months' intervention, while these effects within 2 months are still not certain. Because of the limitation of quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm the above conclusion.
Gitelman syndrome (GS) is an autosomal recessive kidney disorder characterized by low blood levels of potassium and magnesium, decreased excretion of calcium in the urine, and elevated blood pH. The disorder is named for Gitelman, an American nephrologist. He first described it in 1966, after observing a pair of sisters with the disorder. The disorder is caused by inactivating mutations in the SLC12A3 gene, resulting in improper function of the thiazide-sensitive sodium-chloride co-transporter located in the distal convoluted tubule of the kidney. GS was formerly considered a subset of Bartter syndrome until the distinct genetic and molecular bases of these disorders were identified. GS is usually managed by a liberal salt intake together with oral magnesium and potassium supplements. This review aims to establish an initial framework to enable clinical auditing and thus improve quality control of care.