ObjectiveTo evaluate the application of Delone & Mclean (D&M) model in foreign health information technology (HIT), summarize each variable with its emphasis on HIT, in order to provide a reference and theoretical guidance for the evaluation HIT in clinical practice in China. MethodsOvid-medline, Embase, PubMed, Engineering Village, Web of Science, EBSCO, Wanfang Data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP databases were searched from January 1993 to April 2015. Included articles focused on studies about D&M model applied in HIT. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to determine inclusion status. The process was completed by Endnote X6. ResultsFinally, there were 14 eligible full-text papers. In the evaluation, Europe and US accounted for 64.29% in the leading place, Australasia ranked second with 28.57%, and Asia was at last with 7.1%. So it is significant to draw lessons from foreign research. For the methods of data collection, survey was widely used (91.7%). The system quality, information quality and service quality had a significant positive correlation with users' satisfaction and net benefit. ConclusionD&M Model is a good tool to assess HIT.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate pharmacoeconomic studies on Programmed cell death-1/Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors for advanced gastric cancer (GC) globally, providing evidence for healthcare policy formulation and clinical decision-making. MethodsWe conducted electronic searches in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases, retrieving relevant literature published from database inception to February 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed study quality using the CHEERS 2022 checklist. We systematically summarized and analyzed the basic characteristics, model structures, methodological approaches, and economic outcomes of the included studies through inductive analysis. ResultsA total of 15 studies were included, with overall good quality. All included studies employed cost-utility analyses, among which 9 utilized partitioned survival models and 6 adopted Markov models. Direct medical costs were used as the cost calculation basis in all studies. Economic evaluations showed that most PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy were not cost-effective compared with chemotherapy alone. However, in patients with high PD-L1 expression, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapy demonstrated cost-effectiveness for advanced gastric cancer treatment. ConclusionThe economic viability of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapy for advanced GC varies significantly across regions due to drug pricing, economic status, and national contexts. Although most current regimens are not cost-effective, their clinical efficacy advantages suggest substantial future potential. Reducing drug prices is recommended to enhance drug accessibility in China.