Objective To review the research progress on the application of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology in auricle repair and reconstruction. Methods The recent domestic and international research literature on 3D printing and auricle repair and reconstruction was extensively reviewed, and the concept of 3D bioprinting technology and research progress in auricle repair and reconstruction were summarized. Results The auricle possesses intricate anatomical structure and functionality, necessitating precise tissue reconstruction and morphological replication. Hence, 3D printing technology holds immense potential in auricle reconstruction. In contrast to conventional 3D printing technology, 3D bioprinting technology not only enables the simulation of auricular outer shape but also facilitates the precise distribution of cells within the scaffold during fabrication by incorporating cells into bioink. This approach mimics the composition and structure of natural tissues, thereby favoring the construction of biologically active auricular tissues and enhancing tissue repair outcomes. Conclusion 3D bioprinting technology enables the reconstruction of auricular tissues, avoiding potential complications associated with traditional autologous cartilage grafting. The primary challenge in current research lies in identifying bioinks that meet both the mechanical requirements of complex tissues and biological criteria.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology for wound dressing design and preparation. Methods The literature on 3D bioprinted wound dressings in recent years, both domestically and internationally, was retrieved. The core principles of 3D bioprinting technology, mainstream methods, and their applications in wound dressings design and preparation were summarized. Results By leveraging precise spatial manipulation capabilities and multi-material integration, 3D bioprinting technology constructs the functionalized wound dressings with complex structures and bioactivity. These dressings primarily function across several dimensions: wound hemostasis, infection control, controlled drug release, and monitoring wound healing. Conclusion Although 3D bioprinted wound dressings can promote wound healing through multiple dimensions, large-scale clinical validation is still lacking. Future efforts should further clarify their clinical value and scope of application to provide more efficient, precise, and patient-comfortable treatment options for refractory wounds.
For the damage and loss of tissues and organs caused by urinary system diseases, the current clinical treatment methods have limitations. Tissue engineering provides a therapeutic method that can replace or regenerate damaged tissues and organs through the research of cells, biological scaffolds and biologically related molecules. As an emerging manufacturing technology, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology can accurately control the biological materials carrying cells, which further promotes the development of tissue engineering. This article reviews the research progress and application of 3D bioprinting technology in tissue engineering of kidney, ureter, bladder, and urethra. Finally, the main current challenges and future prospects are discussed.