Objective To find out some ideal reconstructions after total gastrectomy in experimental study of rat. Methods Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly and averagely divided into 6 groups: Roux-en-Y group (RY group), proximate jejunal pouch group (PJP group), distal jejunal pouch group (DJP group), two jejunal pouchs group (TJP group), duodenumjejunal pouch interposition group (DJPI group) and laparotomy group (L group). Body weight of rats, intestinal transit distance, adaptive changes in esophagojejunostomic mucosa and morphology changes of intestine after operation were observed and compared. Results At 2 weeks after operation, body weight in each group were significantly lower than that before operation （P＜0.05）. At 4 weeks postoperatively, body weight in PJP group, TJP group and DJPI group were significantly higher than that in RY group respectively （P＜0.05）, as well as at 8 weeks. Intestinal transit distance in PJP group was shorter than that in RY group （P＜0.05）. With regard to intestinal mucosa, TJP group and DJPI group were significantly different with RY group （P＜0.05）. Interestingly, there was no difference in each group as to refluxing esophagitis （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Proximate and two jejunal pouchs Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy seem to be ideal procedures for digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy. The jejunal pouch interposition procedure seems to be same effective to PJP and TJP, but there is no preponderance over the former.
Motor function was investigated by constant perfusion manometry in the Roux limb of ten patients who had undergone total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Results showed that in the fasting state, the migrating motor complex (MMC) was comletely absent, retrograde in direction or bursts of nonphasic pressure activity. Reduced motor activity patterns occurred after the meal in some patients. Four patients failed to convert fasting state into the feeding state. Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomoses provakes a relatively severe distubance in motor function, which could contribute to postoperative upper abdominal distress.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
Objective To explore the feasibility of arch-preserved jejunum in total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction （AEG） and upper-middle gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data of 13 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy with usage of arch-preserved jejunum to resolve the anastomosis tension problem in our hospital from Dec. 2012 to Apr. 2013 were analyzedretrospectively， and surgical experience was summarized. Results The maximal and actual extended lengths were （7.75±1.75） cm （4-10 cm） and （5.95±1.82） cm （3-9 cm） respectively， with the utilization percentage of （77.91±16.60）% （50.0%-100.0%）. These patients hadn’t suffered postoperative mortality and severe complications， such as anastomosis leakage， stenosis， hemorrhage， and so on. Besides， there were 1 case complicated with postoperative acute urinary retention and another 1 case complicated with infra-hepatic space abscess and peritoneal infection. Conclusion Arch-preserved jejunum is a practical surgical technique to handle with the anastomosis tension of esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy for AEG and upper-middle gastric cancer.
Objective To evaluate whether jejunal interposition pouch (JIP) reconstruction is an ideal procedure of digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Methods Ninetyfour patients after total gastrectomy had randomly divided into two groups, JIP group 42 cases and RouxenY pouch (RYP) group 52 cases. The gastrointestinal function improvement in body weight and nutritional parameters (serum albumin, hemoglobin level, and serum protein) were compared 1 year after surgery for the two groups. Results The nutritional condition of JIP group and RYP group after operation had improved (P＜0.01); and the condition of JIP group with fewer symptom problems demonstrated much more better than standard RYP group （P＜0.01）. Conclusion JIP that could obtain partly compensatory function after total gastrectomy is an ideal reconstruction.
Objective To summarize the research progress of digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Methods The domestic and international published literatures about digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer were retrieved and reviewed. Results More and more attention had been paid to the postoperative quality of life after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer， and the most related factor for postoperative quality of life was the type of digestive tract reconstruction. The pouch reconstruction and preservation of enteric myoneural continuity showed beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. Current opinion considered the pouch reconstruction might be safe and effective， and was able to improve the postoperative quality of life of patients with gastric cancer. However， the preservation of duodenal pathway didn’t show significant benefits. Conclusion The optimal digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy is still debating， in order to resolve the controversies， needs more in-depth fundamental researches and more high-quality randomized controlled trials.
The substitution of ρ-shaped jejunum for stomach in 64 patients with gastric carcinoma after total gastrectomy is reported . Survival rate of the first, third anad fifth year afer surgery were 71.8%,42.2% and 34.4% respectively.Postoperative death and complications with fistula of anastomotic stoma , refulx esophagitis and dumping syndrome were not encountered in this all series. These results show that the operative procedure is a simple, safe, and can be accomplished within short time and that the quality of living of the patient is good.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of glutamineenhanced enteral nutritional support on elder patients after total gastrectomy. MethodsA total of eightyfour cases of elder patients receiving total gastrectomy were included in this study from February 2008 to August 2010. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: glutamineenhanced enteral nutrition (Gln) group, enteral nutrition (EN) group and parenteral nutrition (PN) group. The complications and hospital stay after operation were compared, and the levels of serum total protein, albumin, proalbumin， and transferrin of patients were measured before operation, on 2 d and 10 d after operation, respectively. Furthermore, the percentage of CD4 and CD8 T cells, CD4/CD8 ratio， and the levels of serum IgM and IgG of patients in peripheral blood before and after operation were detected. ResultsNutritional therapy was successfully performed in patients of three groups. The anal exhaust time and hospital stay after operation of patients in Gln group and EN group were significantly lower than those in PN group (Plt;0.05). The difference of postoperative complications and digestive tract symptoms of patients in three groups was not obvious (Plt;0.05). Anastomotic fistula occurred in one patient of PN group on 6 d after operation and was cured by conservative treatment for 54 d. The difference of total protein, albumin, proalbumin, and transferrin levels of patients in three groups before operation was not significant (Pgt;0.05), and these indexes fell dramatically on 2 d after operation and lower than before operation (Plt;0.05), although the intergroup difference was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). On 10 d after operation, all indexes recovered in different extent, while those data in Gln group and EN group were significantly higher than those on 2 d after operation (Plt;0.05). The levels of total protein, albumin, and proalbumin of patients in Gln group and EN group were markedly higher than those in PN group (Plt;0.05), although there was no difference between the former groups (Pgt;0.05). The difference of several immunological parameters of patients in three groups before operation was not significant (Pgt;0.05). On 10 d after operation, the percentage of CD4 and CD8 T cells, CD4/CD8 ratio, and the levels of serum IgM and IgG of patients in Gln group returned and even exceeded the preoperative results, which were significantly higher than those in EN group and PN group other than IgM (Plt;0.05). The postoperative results of all parameters except IgG in EN group were significantly lower than preoperative results in patients of EN group and PN group (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsIt is safe and feasible to elder patients who had received total gastrectomy and perioperative glutamine-enhanced nutritional support, which can improve nutrition and immune status, promote the recovery and reduce the duration of hospital stay, and nutritiional support after total gastrectomy is one of the optimal choices for these patients.
Objective To evaluate the effect of total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for the treatment of advanced esophagogastric junction cancer. Methods Clinical data of 273 cases of advanced esophagogastric junction cancer who underwent TG and PG in our hospital from Jan. 2004 to Dec. 2010 were reviewed for retrospective analysis. Operation related indexes, 3-year cumulative survival rate, and 5-year cumulative survival rate were compared and evaluated. Results There was no significant difference between TG group and PG group in intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay(P > 0.05), but the number of dissected lymph nodes in TG group was obviously more than those of PG group, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.000). The postoperative complication rates were 10.3%(12/117)in TG group and 21.8%(34/156) in PG group respectively, which was lower in TG group(χ2=6.353, P < 0.05). The 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates of TG group were 58.9% and 34.2%, of PG group were 43.4% and 23.6% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates were all lower in PG group(χ2=5.894, P < 0.05;χ2=5.582, P < 0.05). For patients in stage pT4, pN2, and TNMⅢ, whose tumor size were bigger than 3.0 cm, and patients who had accept chemotherapy, the 3-and 5-year cumulative survival rates of TG group were significantly higher than those of PG group(P < 0.05). However, for patients in stage pT2, pT3, pN0, pN1, pN3, TNMⅠ, TNMⅡ, TNMⅣ, whose tumor size were smaller than 3.0 cm, who had not accept chemotherapy, and patients of any pathological type, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates(P > 0.05). Conclusion For the patients who suffered from advanced esophagogastric junction cancer, TG can improve long-term survival rate, and it can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve postoperative quality of life.
Objective To investigate the differences of postoperative quality of life （QOL） between proximal gas-trectomy （PG） and total gastrectomy （TG） in patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction （AEG）. Methods Eighty five patients with AEG （Siewert type Ⅱ or Ⅲ） who were underwent PG or TG surgery between Jan. 2011 andMar. 2012 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were enrolled， to measure the QOL by using the Chineseversion of quality of life questionnaire core-30 （QLQ-C30） and the site-specific module for gastric cancer （QLQ-STO22）which were drawed up by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer （EORTC） in 12 months afteroperation. Results There were no any difference of clinicopathological features between patients in 2 groups （P＞0.05），such as age， gender， and so on. The scores of eating restriction， diarrhea， and dyspnea in PG group were lower than those of TG group （P＜0.05）， but scores of reflux and taste change were higher （P＜0.05）， no other significant differ-ence was found between the patients of 2 groups （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Both of PG＋gastric tube reconstruction and TG＋Roux-en-Y anastomosis in treatment of patients with Siewert type Ⅱ or Ⅲ AEG may lead to complications， but patients who underwent former surgery have better situation in eating restriction， diarrhea， and dyspnea， and patients who underwent later surgery have better situation in reflux and taste change.