ObjectiveTo observe the expression of inflammatory cytokines in diabetic rats received posterior sub-Tenon capsule injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and pan-retinal photocoagulation. MethodsA total of 48 Brown Norway rats received intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin to establish the diabetic model. Diabetic rats were randomly divided into experimental group (20 rats), control group (20 rats) and blank group (8 rats). 50 μl TA or saline was injected into the posterior sub-Tenon capsule immediately after the photocoagulation in the experimental group and the control group, respectively. The blank group received no treatment. The mRNA and protein expression level of retinal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis fator-α (TNF-α) were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at 1, 3, 7 days after laser photocoagulation. ResultsThe mRNA and protein expression of VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α of the experimental group and control group were significantly higher than the blank group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mRNA and protein expression of VEGF, IL-6 and TNF-α of the experimental group were significantly lower than that of the control group. On day 1 after laser photocoagulation, the mRNA expression of VEGF was not statistically significant in the experimental group and control group (P > 0.05), the mRNA and protein expression of VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α of the two groups were statistically significant in the remaining observing time (P < 0.05). ConclusionPosterior sub-Tenon capsule injection of TA can effectively reduce retinal photocoagulation induced VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α expression.
Objective To compare the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone(IVTA) injection and IVTA combined with macular laser grid photocoagulation（MLGP）to treat macular edema.Methods Consecutive 89 patients （109 eyes）diagnosed with macular edema by examinations of ocular fundus and optical coherence tomography (OCT).The visual acuity was hand moving-0.8 (0.19plusmn;0.13)；the intraocular pressure（IOP）ranged from 7 mm Hg to 21 mm Hg（1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa）and the average IOP was 13.78 mm Hg.All the patients received OCT and microperimetry examinations，the central macular thickness was （570plusmn;182）mu;m；the average light sensitivity was （5.07plusmn;3.94） dB and the fixation percentage was 70.67% within 4 deg;area around the macular fovea. All the patients received IVTA treatment，39 patients（48 eyes）further received MLGP 1 month later (IVTAMLGP group). The remaining 50 patients (61 eyes) without MLGP treatment was the IVTA group. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),IOP,lens,OCT and microprimetry examinations before and after IVTA (1,3,6,12 months) were followed and analyzed.Results On the 12th months，the BCVA in IVTAMLGP and IVTA group was （0.41plusmn;0.20）、（0.24plusmn;0.19）respectively (P＜0.05)；the central macular thickness was （309plusmn;187） and （487plusmn;206） mu;m respectively（P＜0.05）；the mean light sensitivity of 4deg; central macular was （8.24plusmn;4.64）and（6.30plusmn;3.22）dB respectively（P＜0.05）；the fixation percentage was（87.01plusmn;19.70）% and（78.85plusmn;20.41）% respectively （P＜0.05）. During the followup recurrent macular edema was noticed in 28 eyes of IVTA group and 8 eyes of IVTAMLGP group.Conclusions IVTA combined with MLG was more effective than IVTA to cure macular edema.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and security of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for macular edema.MethodsA total of 41 eyes in 37 patients with macular edema who measured up were collected, including 21 eyes of 21 cases in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) group, 17 eyes of 13 cases in diabetic retinopathy (DR) group, and 3 eyes of 3 cases in the other-causes group. Before the treatment, the average visual acuity was 0.07, 0.06, and 0.08 in the 3 groups respectively, and the mean thickness of macular fovea detected by optic coherence tomography (OCT) was (974±394) and (873±213) in RVO and DR group, respectively. Intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA (40 mg/ml) was performed on each patient. The average follow-up duration was 8 months after the treatment. The visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), changes of lens and ocular fundus, and retinal thichness at macular area before and after the treatment was observed and compared.ResultsAll eyes except one had improved visual acuity. The mean visual acuity improved to 0.25, 0.20, and 0.35 in the 3 groups respectively 6 months after the treatment. Alleviated or reducing macular edema was found in all of the patients. The average retinal thickness at macular fovea was (173±41) and (204±76) in RVO and DR group respectively 1 month after the treatment, which had statistical significance compared with that before the treatment (t =8.323, 6.842; P＜0.01). The intraocular pressure was ＞21 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) in 6 eyes (14.6%), which mostly happened 1 week to 2 months after the injection, and was controlled to normal level after partially treated with βreceptor retarder. The cataract developed in 1 eye, and another patient with macular edema after vitrectomy due to diabetes had macular hole 2 months after the injection. There were 2 eyes underwent intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA 4-5 months after the first treatment due to the recurrence of macular edema in RVO and DR group respectively.ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA is a promising therapeutic method for macular edema that fails to respond to conventional treatment. Transient elevation of ocular pressure is the most common side effect. Further study is needed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:209-212)
ObjectiveTo observe the short-term efficacy of posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) in the treatment of macular edema due to ischemic retinal vein occlusions (RVO). MethodsA retrospective clinical study. A total of 53 eyes of 53 patients with RVO macular edema diagnosed by fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were included in the study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected by the international standard visual acuity chart, and the results were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT. Among 53 eyes, there were 27 eyes with ischemic RVO macular edema (ischemic group) and 26 eyes with non-ischemic RVO macular edema (non-ischemic group). The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.82±0.37, mean CMT was (662.1±216.7) μm in ischemic group. The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.41±0.23, mean CMT was (548.0±161.9) μm. The differences of logMAR BCVA and CMT between the two groups were both statistically significant (t=4.745, 2.258; P<0.05). All eyes were treated with a single sub-Tenon injection of 0.4 ml triamcinolone acetonide suspension (100 mg/ml).The mean logMAR BCVA, CMT before and 1, 3 months after the treatment between the two groups were observed and compared. ResultsOn 1 and 3 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA in the non-ischemic group (0.32±0.25 and 0.27±0.29) were improved compared with ischemic group (0.76±0.37 and 0.41±0.79), the difference was statistically significant (t=5.052, 5.240; P<0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA before and after treatment had no statistically significant difference in ischemic group (F=0.516, P>0.05), but had a statistically significant difference in non-ischemic group (F=7.685, P<0.05). On 1 and 3 months after treatment, the mean CMT in the ischemic group were (534.7±223.4), (470.8±234.7) μm, which were lower (127.4±28.28), (191.4±34.55) μm before treatment. In the non-ischemic group, the average CMT was (426.2±188.8), (371.3±200.6) μm, which were lower (103.1±33.1), (164.9±49.6) μm. There were statistically significant differences in the mean CMT between the ischemic group and the non-ischemic group (F=17.040, 10.360; P<0.05). In non-ischemic group, CMT had a bigger reduction compared to the the ischemic group (t=2.056, 2.103; P<0.05). The difference of CMT decrease value between two groups was not statistically significant (t=0.560, 0.441; P>0.05). On 1 month after the treatment, there were 3 and 5 eyes had a higher intraocular pressure than 21 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) in ischemic and non-ischemic group, respectively; but all of them returned to normal after drug treatment. There were no drugs and ocular injection related complications. ConclusionPSTA of ischemic RVO macular edema can lower the CMT in the short term, but can't significant improve the visual acuity.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide combined of macular laser grid photocoagulation (IVTA/MLG) versus macular laser grid (MLG) photocoagulation only for treatment of diabetic macular edema. Methods A computerized search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Embase Library, Pubmed, Chinese Biomedical Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database and Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Database. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) on IVTA/MLG and MLG only for treatment of diabetic macular edema were selected. After the data extraction, quality of RCT was assessed. The meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1.The outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central foveal thickness (CMT). Results In total, six RCT that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included in the metaanalysis involving 166 eyes in MLG group and 165 eyes in IVTA/MLG group. The results suggested that there was no significant differences in BCVA (Z=1.27,P=0.20), but differences were statistically significant comparing CMT (Z=2.41,P=0.02), incidence of ocular hypertension and cataract (Z=3.62,P＜0.01) between MLG and IVTA/MLG groups at the six month follow-up. Conclusions There is no significant advantage of IVTA/MLG as compared with MLG,but it could reduce CMT. However, a high-quality, large sample RCT should be further investigated.
ObjectiveTo observe the therapeutic effect of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on diffused diabetic macular edema.MethodsIntravitreous injection with TA was performed on 21 patients with diabetic macular edema who had undergone ocular-fundus examination, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The followup duration was 1 month, 3, and 6 months. The visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and retinal thickness at the macular area before and after the treatment, examined by ETDRS eye chart, noncontact tonometer, and OCT respectively, were observed and compared.ResultsOne month, 3, and 6 months after the injection, the mean extent of improvement of visual acuity was 7.5, 9.1 (including 2-line improvement in 10 eyes which occupied 48%), and 5.1 letters respectively; while the decrease of retinal thickness at macula was 143 μm (decrease of 33%), 184 μm (decrease of 42%), and 151 μm (decrease of 35%) respectively.ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA is effective for diffused diabetic macular edema in a short term (about 3 months).(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:217-219)
ObjectiveTo discuss the role and effect of the triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection applied in the vitreoretinal surgery for assisting to distinguish and removal residual cortex.MethodsOne thousand and forty-six patients (1 056 eyes) underwent a PPV at West China Eye Center from August 2003 to February 2005. These affected eyes were selected without posterior vitreous detachment pre-and intra-operatively, and underwent intravitreal injection with TA 1-2 mg to label the residual vitreous cortex on the surface of the posterior retina after removal of the majority vitreous.ResultsThe location and coverage of the residual vitreous cortex were clearly be shown by the white appearance of TA labeled residual vitreous, and the residual vitreous cortex was conveniently to be recognized and removed.ConclusionThe application of intravitreal injection with TA is helpful for identification and elimination of the residual vitreous cortex in vitreoretinal surgery.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:226-228)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on macular edema.MothodHaving been examined by ophthalmoscopy, optic coherent tomography (OCT), retinal thickness analyzer (RTA), and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), 33 patients (37 eyes) with diffused and (or) cystoid macular edema caused by diabetes and retinal venous occlusion were intravitreously injected with 0.1 ml triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml). During 1-9 month followup period, the visual acuity, intraocular pressure, inflammatory extent, manifestation of lens and fundus were observed, the retinal thickness was examined by OCT and RTA, and vascular leakage were detected by FFA.ResultsMacular thickness was (244.07±118.80), (195.53±57.70), and (181.42±54.79) μm respectively 1, 2, 3 months after treatment; while macular thickness was (724.35±227.41) μm before the treatment. The difference was statistically significant （t =10.72, 12.84, 13.90; P lt;0.001）. The visual acuity was 0.39±0.19, 0.45±0.24, and 0.43±0.21 respectively, comparing with the visual acuity before the treatment (0.20±0.16), the difference was statistically significant （t =4.445, 4.349, 3.474; P lt;0.001, lt;0.001, 0.03）；The result of FFA showed less leakage of fluorescein and proliferative lesion. Four pateints had the ocular pressure ≥25 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) in 9 who had ≥20 mm Hg. Recurrence of macular edema was found in 4 eyes of 3 patients 4 and 6 months after the treatment, respectively. No infection or aggravation of lenticular turbidness occurred.ConclusionIntravitreous injection with TA can be used to treat macular edema due to diabetes and retinal venous occlusion, and recurrence of macular edema or increase of intraocular pressure may occur in some patients.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:205-208)
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of triamcinolone acetonide(TA) on activation and barrier function of human retinal pigment epithelium （RPE）.MethodsARPE-19 cells were cultured in 96well tissue culture plate. Four weeks later, TA with different concentration (0.02 and 0.05 mg/ml)was added to the cells and culture for 3 or 7 days. The activation of ARPE-19 cells was assessed by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT). ARPE-19 cells were cultured on polyester microporous filters for 4 weeks, and the transepithelial resistance (TER) was recorded. TA (0.02 and 0.05 mg/ml) was added to the culture fluid respectively, and after cultured for 1 week TER was measured again. The RPE permeability was detected by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with horse radish peroxidase as the tracer. ResultsIn the culture fluid with 002 mg/ml TA cultured for 3 or 7 days, the average survival rate of ARPE-19 cells was 93.70% and 90.63% respectively, without statistic difference compared with the control (P=0.147, 0.091). While in the 0.05 mg/ml TA group after cultured for the same duration, the activation of ARPE-19 cells decreased significantly compared with the control (with the average survival rate of 87.75% and 88.98%; P=0.025, 0.043). One week after cultured with TA, TER decreased significantly while permeability improved obviously in the 2 TA groups compared to the control (Plt;0.001; 0.001lt;Plt;0.05).ConclusionTA may decrease the activation of and destroy the barrier function of ARPE-19 cells. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:237-239)
ObjectiveTo seek the evidencebased medicine (EBM) evidences of curative effects of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for macular edema.MethodsAll articles of intravitreous injection TA for macular edema published in English or Chinese were picked up from databases of MEDLINE and CNKI and then evaluated according to EBM standard. The data in accord with research standard were selected by using excluding and including criteria, and classified according to the appraisal standard of clinical therapeutic documents. ResultsIn the selected papers, none in gradeⅠevidence; 1 in gradeⅡevidence; 7 in grade Ⅲ evidence; 24 in grade Ⅳ evidence; and 19 in gradeⅤevidence. Forty-two papers reported that intravitreous injection with TA had significant effect for macular edema within 3 months, and the improvement of visual acuity was recorded in these papers. Regression of macular edema was recorded in 23 papers. Among 20 papers, side-effect was found in 93 eyes (31.41%) and the serious sideeffect in 4 eyes (1.35%).ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA has some curative effects for macular edema in short term, but the quality of current study has not been encouraging. There are no grade I document and lack of the study of validity in long term and essentiality and validity of retreatment. The special attention should be payed on the increasing persistency of efficacy and preventing the serious side-effects in the future investigation.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:220-223)