Variceal bleeding in cirrhosis is one of the most challenging problems in gastroenterology. Bleeding from gastro-oesophageal varices is a main cause of early death (approximately 30%-50% at the first bleeding) in cirrhosis. The aim of our therapy is to locate the place of bleeding, control active bleeding and prevent rebleeding, but it is difficult sometimes. A number of treatment strategies, such as somatostain analogs, vasopressin, endoscopic therapy, transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS) have evolved over time, but which is better? New evidence of therapy for variceal haemorrhage will be introduced in Cirrhosis that includes: 1.Somatostatin, vasopressin, ligation, schlerotherapy and balloon tamponade for acute variceal bleeding; 2.β-blockers, ligation, schlerotherapy and shunt surgery for prophylaxis of primary variceal bleeding; 3.β-blockers, ligation, schlerotherapy, shunt surgery and TIPS for prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding; 4. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cirrhosis with gastrointestinal bleeding.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of histamine H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) for the prevention of stress ulcer bleeding (SUB) in critically ill patients. Methods Trials were identified by searching Cochrane Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1980 to October 2006),EMbase (1984 to October 2006) and the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978 to October), Chinese VIP Database (1989 to October 2006) and Chinese EBM Database. We also handsearched the proceedings of relevant conferences, 5 kinds of important Chinese journals and the references of all included trials. Two reviewers assessed the quality of studies and extracteddata independently. Disagreement was resolved by discussion . The primary outcomes included were incidence of SUB, incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (NP), mortality and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were gastric pH, length of hospital stayand length of ICU stay. RevMan4.2.7 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Sixteen trials involving 2 014 patients were included. Most of the trials were of poor quality. Meta-analyses showed that H2RA significantly less SUB comparedwith patients in the placebo or non-prophylaxis group (RR 0.39, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.56; Plt;0.000 01, NNT=6), but but there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinically important bleeding (RR 0.51 , 95%CI 0.17 to 1.53; P=0.11). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of NP(RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.89,P=0.95). H2RA significantly decreased mortality in comparison with placebo or non-prophylaxis (RR 0.68, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.90; P=0.007, NNT=18). H2RA had a good safety profile. We did not perform meta-analysis for gastric pH due to the methodological limitations. Conclusion H2RA may significantly reduce the incidence of SUB and mortality, but cannot reduce the incidence of clinically important bleeding. Due to the poor quality of included studies, the conclusion should be interpreted cautiously. More randomized controlled trials with sufficient sample size, uniform standards, higher quality and scientifically sound methodology should be performed.
Objective To provide evidence of the role of helicobacter pylori eradication in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Methods We searched VIP, CBMdisc, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials and clinical guidelines involving helicobacter pylori and functional dyspepsia, so as to provide the best evidence for clinical practice. Results We included two systematic reviews, one meta-analysis and eleven randomized controlled trials. The evidence identified showed that helicobacter pylori infection was more prevalent in functional dyspepsia than in asymptomatic patients, but the effect of H pylori infection in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia remained controversial. H pylori eradication therapy had a relatively weak effect in H pylori positive functional dyspepsia. An economic model suggested that this modest benefit may still be cost-effective, but more studies are needed to assess this. Conclusion According to the current evidence, it can be concluded that helicobacter pylori eradication for the treatment of functional dyspepsia should be individualized.
Objective To determine the effectiveness and safety of pneumatic balloon dilatation in patients with achalasia. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE or PUBMED (1978-2007), Embase (1978-2007), OVID Database (1978-2007), Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBMDisc, 1978-2007), CNKI (1979-2007), Chinese VIP Database (1989-2007) and Wanfang Database (1978-2007). We also checked the reference lists of retrieved articles and relevant proceedings. We used the methods recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration to conduct this systematic review. Results Twenty four trials involving 1045 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed that the short-term total effective rate was much higher with pneumatic dilatation than intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection (P=0.0007). The long-term total effective rate was higher with pneumatic dilatation compared to intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection (P=0.005). Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection was superior to pneumatic dilatation in terms of clinical relapse rate (Plt;0.0001). Our analyses of complications and adverse effects found that pneumatic dilatation was superior to intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection (P=0.0008), and endoscopic sphincterotomy was superior to balloon dilatation (P=0.0006). Conclusions The limited current evidence shows that: pneumatic dilatation is safe and effective for the short- or long-term treatment of achalasia.
ObjectiveTo systematically review clinical value of des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) in the diagnostic of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC).MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Medline (Ovid), CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM were electronically searched to collect relevant studies on DCP in the diagnosis of PHC from inception to December 31st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using Meta-Disc 1.4 software and RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 50 studies involving 15 099 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio, pooled negative likelihood ratio, pooled diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve of SROC were 0.69 (95%CI 0.67 to 0.70), 0.89 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.90), 7.35 (95%CI 6.08 to 8.90), 0.31 (95%CI 0.27 to 0.35), 26.63 (95%CI 20.42 to 34.73) and 0.909 9, respectively.ConclusionsSerum DCP has higher diagnostic efficacy for PHC, especially with higher specificity of diagnosis. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above results should be validated by more studies.
Objective To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitor （PPI） and H2RA for stress ulcer bleeding in stroke patients. Methods Randomized controlled trials （RCT） were identified from MEDLINE （ 1966- Oct. 2005 ） ,EMBASE （ 1984- Oct. 2005 ）, The Cochrane Library （ Issue 4,2005 ）, CBMdisc （ 1980- Oct. 2005 ） and VIP（ 1980- Oct. 2005 ）. We handsearched the related published and unpublished data and their references. The quality of included trials was evaluated. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently with a designed extraction form. RevMan 4. 2.7 software was used for data analysis. Results Twenty RCT were included with 2 624 patients. The results of meta-analysis were listed as follows： （1） stress ulcer bleeding （SUB） ： PPI （ OR 0.14,95% CI 0.08 to 0.24, NNT = 3 ） and H2RA （OR 0.24,95% CI 0.15 to 0.39, NNT =5） significantly reduced the incidence of SUB in comparison with control group. PPI significantly reduced the incidence of SUB compared with H2R.A（P 〈0. 00001 ）. （2） Mortality： PPI （OR 0.22,95% CI 0. 11 to 0.47, NNT =8） and H2RA （OR 0.53,95% CI 0. 34 to 0.81, NNT =16） significantly decreased the mortality compared with non-prophylaxis group. PPI significantly decreased the mortality compared with H2RA （OR 0.28,95% CI 0.09 to 0. 89）. （3） Adverse effect： There were not evident adverse effects in both PPI and H2RA groups. Conclusions PPI and H2RA may reduce the incidence and mortality of SUB in stroke patients, and PPls are better in reducing incidence of SUB than H2RA.
Objective To evaluate the difference of oral sodium phosphate (NaP) and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) in the aspects of cleansing efficacy, tolerance, and safety in clinical practice, so as to provide evidence for clinical practice. Methods A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed according the handbook of the Cochrane Collaboration. RCTs were identified from The Cochrane Library(Issue1,2004) MEDLINE(1980-2004), EMBASE(1984-2004),and CBM(1978-2004).Handsearching was also performed .RCTs comparing the two methods were selected .Tow reviewers independently assessed the quality of included trials and extracted data independently .Results Eighteen trials involving 3668 patients were included .Sub-group analysis was performed. Nap tablet had higher rate of adequate cleansing quality (RR1.08,95%CI1.02 to 1.05,p=0.01).Two-day ,divided-dose oral Nap was superior in the rate of adequate cleansing quality (RR1.27,95%CI1.06 to 1.52,p=0.009). .The. rate of adequate cleansing quality in right colon of Nap was lower than PEG-ELS(RR0.79,95%CI 0.64 to 0.98,p=0.03).The rate of abdominal cramps (RR 0.84,95%CI 0.72 to 0.99),the rate of abdominal fullness (RR 0.48,95%CI 0.26 to 0.89),the rate of nausea (RR 0.65,95%CI 0.56 to 0.76)and the percentage of patients who didn’t finished their prescribed regimen (RR 0.23,95%CI0.14 to 0.36)in Nap group were lower (plt;0.05).Conclusions Compared with PEG-ELS,Nap is superior in cleansing efficacy , patients’ tolerance ,safety and economy . It is possible to promote the use of Nap in clinical practice in China .
Objective To determine the effectiveness and safety of mosapride in patients with functional dyspepsia. Methods Trials were located through electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) ( Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1978 to Jun. 2006), EMbase (1978 to Jun.2006), ISI (2000 to Jun.2006), OVID Database (1978 to Jun.2006), Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978 to Jun.2006), Chinese VIP Database (1994 to Jun.2006) and WANFANG Database ( 1978 to Jun.2006). We also checked the bibliographies of retrieved articles and handsearched four kinds of important journals. Results Total of 18 trials involving 2 929 patients were included in the meta-analyses. These showed: (1) remission rate of global symptoms: Mosapride was not superior to placebo (RR 2.72, 95%CI 0.87 to 8.46), but was superior to metoclopramide (RR 1.66, 95%CI 0.82 to 3.35) and domperidone (RR 1.23, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.34); (2) remission rate of individual symptoms: 1) upper abdominal flatulence: Mosapride was superior to domperidone (RR 1.35, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.60), but was not superior to cisapride (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.15); 2) postprandial fullness: Mosapride was superior to domperidone (RR 2.72, 95%CI 2.02 to 3.66), but was not superior to cisapride (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.18); 3) upper abdominal pain: Mosapride was superior to domperidone (RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.07 to1.49), but was not superior to cisapride (RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.17); 4) early saciety: Mosapride was superior to domperidone (RR 1.42, 95%CI 1.15 to 1.76), but was not superior to cisapride (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.17); 5) nausea: Mosapride was not superior to cisapride (RR 1.07, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.39) and domperidone (RR 1.12 ,95%CI 0.97 to 1.28); 6) vomitting: Mosapride was not superior to cisapride (P=0.80) and domperidone (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.18); 7) eructation: Mosapride was superior to domperidone (RR 1.41, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.70), but was not superior to cisapride (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.05); 8) anorexia: Mosapride was superior to domperidone (RR 1.22, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.44), but was not superior to cisapride (RR0.88, 95%CI 0.64 to 1.19); 9) sour regurgitation: Mosapride was not superior to domperidone (P=0.64) and cisapride (P=0.32); 10) heartburn: Mosapride was not superior to domperidone (RR 0.97, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.10) and cisapride (RR 1.05, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.21); 11) upper abdominal discomfort: Mosapride was not superior to cisapride (P =0.64); (3) adverse event rate: Mosapride had a good safety profile. Conclusions The limited current evidence shows that, mosapride is not superior to placebo in relieving global symptoms, but is superior to domperidone in relieving upper abdominal flatulence, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal pain, early saciety, erutation and anorexia. Mosapride has a good safety profile.
Objective To review the eradication rate for Helicobacter Pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy with Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC). Methods A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed according to International Cochrane Collaboration. Data Source RCTs were identified from specialized trials register of Cochrane U GDP Group, the Cochrane library, additional electronic search (including MEDLINE and CBM), handsearching, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. Data Selection Randomized clinical trials comparing RBC or RBC in combination with other antibiotics such as proton pump inhibitor, H2-receptor antagonist, other bismuth or placebo were included. No language and blinding limitations were applied. Inclusion criteria Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was assessed by the Jadad-scale plus allocation concealment. Statistics analysis was managed by using RevMan 4. 1. Results Fifteen randomized clinical trials including 3 638 patients were included, with eight trials of high methodological quality. Meta-analysis indicated that odds ratio was 3.06 (95%CI 2.62 to 3. 58, P lt; 0. 000 01) comparing RBC to controls. But the heterogeneity was significant (P lt; 0. 000 01), so we choose random effects model. Then the odds ratio was 2.05 (95%CI 1. 29 to 3. 25, P=0.002). No serious adverse effects were found. Sensitivity analysis showed that the specimens and the quality of RCT haven’t affected researching result. Conclusion RBC is more effective in Helicobacter Pylori eradication therapy than others.
Objective To provide best available evidence for clinical practice and further research planning on IBS treatment, we reviewed systematically all the randomised controlled trials on calcium channel blockers for irritable bowel syndrome. The primary objective was to determine whether there was enough evidence that calcium channel blocker was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with IBS. Method Searches were performed in Trials Register of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, data from the pharmaceutical company were also retrieved. In addition we searched the electronic bibliographic databases: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase, Chinese Biological Medical Database (CBM-disc). We handsearched some important Chinese journals. Two reviewers included studies, assessed the quality of studies and extracted data independently. Disagreement was resolved by discussion or the third party when needed. The following primary outcomes were assessed: ① Effective rate at the end of experiment, ② Improvmemnt in abodeminal pain and distention, ③ Adverse events. Results 49 potentially eligible trials were identified, of which 9 trials (831 patients) were included. 8 trials were waiting for assessment. The mean percentage of patients with global improvement was 48.9% in control group and 75% in the calcium channel blockers group. In favour of calcium group with a mean OR 4.54, 95%CI (2.38, 8.66). Conclusions Selective calcium channel blockers might be effective and safe in the treatment of patients with IBS.Because the methodological quality of all included studies was poor,further high-quality randomised controlled trials should be performed.