ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for postoperative overall and severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of the elderly (65 years old or more) patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD were retrospectively collected, who were admitted to the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2017 to October 2021. The incidences of postoperative overall and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ–Ⅴ was defined as severe complications) were summarized. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze whether GNRI was a risk factor for overall and severe complications after PD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of GNRI to distinguish whether overall or severe complications occurred after PD and to confirm the optimal threshold. Then the patients were assigned into a high nutritional risk group (greater than the optimal threshold) and low nutritional risk group (the optimal threshold or less) based on this. Simultaneously, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsIn this study, 190 elderly patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled, 95(50.0%) of whom developed complications, including 28(29.5%) cases of serious complications. The results of multivariate logistic regression model analysis showed that the decreased GNRI was a risk factor for the occurrence of overall and severe complications after PD for the elderly patients [OR(95%CI)=0.361(0.154, 0.848), P=0.019; OR(95%CI)=0.906(0.834, 0.983), P=0.018]. The AUC of GNRI for assessing the occurrence of overall and severe complications was 0.765 and 0.715, respectively, with the optimal critical values of 98 and 96, respectively. Compared with the low nutritional risk group, the high nutritional risk group had higher postoperative total hospitalization costs (Z=–2.37, P=0.019), higher occurrences of overall complications (χ2=44.61, P<0.001) and severe complications (χ2=29.39, P＜0.001). ConclusionsIn elderly patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD, incidence of serious complications is not lower. GNRI has a good discriminative value in terms of postoperative overall and severe complications. When preoperative GNRI is 98 or less and GNRI is 96 or less, patients should be given early preoperative nutritional support treatment in time.
Objective To explore the hepatic artery variations encountered in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) surgery and its significance. Methods The clinical datas of 26 patients who underwent LPD from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected. Preoperative evaluation of hepatic artery variability and its types based on relevant clinical and imaging data, as well as targeted measures taken during surgery, and patients’ prognosis were analyzed. Results According to preoperative abdominal enhanced CT, arterial computer tomography angiography imaging and intraoperative skeletonization of the hepatoduodenal ligament, hepatic artery variation was found in 9 of 26 patients undergoing LPD. The left hepatic artery was substituted in 1 case, the right hepatic artery was substituted in 2 cases, 2 cases were the left accessory hepatic artery, and the common hepatic artery originated from the superior mesenteric artery in 3 cases. There was 1 case, right hepatic artery coming from the abdominal aorta, whose arterial variation was not included in the traditional typing. The variant hepatic artery from superior mesenteric artery was separated by posterior approach during operation, and the variant hepatic artery from left gastric artery was separated by anterior approach during operation. Nine patients with hepatic artery variation recovered well after operation, and no serious complications occurred. Conclusions Various hepatic artery variations during LPD need to be carefully evaluated before surgery. During surgery, it should be determined whether to retain the mutated blood vessel based on its diameter and changes in liver blood flow after occlusion, so that reasonable operation can be performed during the operation to avoid hepatic artery damage.
ObjectiveTo summarize the application status and prospect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodThe relevant literatures about studies of LPD at home and abroad were reviewed.ResultsLPD was a difficult operation, mainly suitable for pancreatic head and periampullary benign and malignant tumors. With the development of laparoscopic techniques in recent years, LPD combined the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein resection and reconstruction, or combined multi-visceral resection was feasible, but the survival benefit of LPD with arterial resection and reconstruction and extended lymph node dissection remained to be discussed. At present, there was no clear requirement on the way to reconstruct the pancreatic fluid outflow tract, but the pancreaticojejunostomy for digestive tract reconstruction was chose by the most surgeons. The most studies had confirmed that LPD was minimally invasive and had a short-term prognosis that was not inferior to that of open pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the results of large sample analysis about long-term survival rate and oncology results were lacking, so it was difficult to judge the advantages and disadvantages of long-term prognosis of the two methods.ConclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, reasonable, and effective surgical method. With improvement of laparoscopic technology, LPD is expected to become a standard operation method for treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma, and oncology benefits of LPD will be further confirmed in future by large-sample clinical randomized control trials and studies of long-term prognosis follow-up.
Objective To explore how to integrate the various sources of information in designing an evidence-based nursing care plan for preventing gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Method Papers and references about prevention of GIH after PD were searched between September and October 2015, and an evidence-based nursing care plan was drawn up and implemented from November 2015 to January 2016. Results A total of 79 papers were found and of which 17 were aviliable. Thirty-nine patients were cared on the basis of the effective project, of whom one was dignosed with GIH on the 3rd postoperative day and the rate of post-PD hemorrhage was 2.6%. All patients were diacharged on the 6th or 7th postoperative day. Conclusion Exploring evidences under the guidance of scientific method and applying them to clinical nursing can prevent post-PD hemorrhage and improve life quality of patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the various methods in prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe literatures over the years related to prevention of pancreatic fistula were reviewed.ResultsManagement of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy played the most important role in preventing pancreatic fistula. None of the methods of pancreatic stump had proved to be perfect in preventing pancreatic fistula, though pancreaticojejunostomy was the most widely practiced reconstruct strategy in varieties of option. For pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy, the rate of this complication was 12.3% and 11.1%,respectively. In recent years, a new procedure, bindingup pancreaticoduodenectomy, had shown a promise and excellent results in prevention of pancreatic fistula, the rate of fistula was 0 for consecutive 100 cases after pancreaticoduodenectomy.ConclusionBindingup pancreaticojejunostomy have a definite effect to avoid pancreatic fistula and be worthy of being recommended
ObjectiveTo discuss application of " counter clockwise resection” in total laparoscopic pan-creaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) and summarize it’s preliminary experiences.MethodThe clinical data of consecutive 8 patients underwent TLPD in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from July 2016 to January 2017 were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThere were 3 males and 5 females in these 8 patients. The age was (64.13±15.01) years. The results of postoperative pathology included 1 duodenal cancer, 2 distal biliary tract cancers, 4 pancreatic head cancers, and 1 solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreatic head. All the 8 patients were performed with TLPD successfully, and the time of the operation was (527.50±69.44) min, the resection time of the specimen was (241.25±38.71) min, and the blood loss was (368.75±162.43) mL, the postoperative hospitalization stay was (18.67±4.00) d. There were no postoperative bleeding, perioperative death, and delayed gastric emptying．Four patients suffered from the pancreatic fistula including 3 cases of grade A and 1 case of grade B pancreatic fistulas, and 1 case suffered from the intra-abdominal infection, who were cured after the conservative treatment. All the patients were following-up, and there was no abnormality.ConclusionPreliminary results of limited cases in this study show that " counter clockwise resection” might be a safe, effective, and easy method of TLPD, but further research is need to study.
ObjectiveTo investigate the occurrence and treatment of postoperative complications after laparoscopic laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPPPD) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). MethodThe clinical data of 130 patients undergoing LPD from October 2010 to December 2015 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsOf 130 patients, postoperative complications occurred in 55 cases, including 24 cases of pancreatic fistula, 14 cases of gastric emptying disorder, 3 cases of anastomotic bleeding, 6 cases of peritoneal infection, 1 case of bile leakage, 1 case of venous thrombosis, 1 case of chylous leakage, 5 cases of peritoneal effusion, without the occurrence of stress ulcer and incision complications. There were significant difference in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P=0.025), gastric emptying disorder (P=0.034), anastomotic bleeding (P=0.020), and peritoneal infection (P=0.016) among prophase group, metaphase group, and the later stage group. ConclusionsThe most common complication after LPD is pancreatic fistula. With the improvement of surgical techniques and procedures, incidences of some postoperative complications decreases gradually.
ObjectiveTo investigate the age of patients can be the independence factor to affect the feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsThe cases in the First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University from Feb. 2011 to Feb. 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into six groups according to age < 50, 50≤age < 60, 60≤age < 70, 70≤age < 75, 70≤age < 80, and≥80 years old. The complications, hospitalization days, and mortality rates for six groups were analyzed. ResultsThe differences in ASA classification (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.001), coronary heart disease (P=0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), heart failure (P=0.001), respiratory failure (P=0.037), postoperative hospitalization days (P=0.014), and delayed gastric emptying grade C (P=0.006) had statistical significance, and pancreatic fistula (P=0.058), postoperative bleeding (P=0.786), and mortality (P=0.125) of the different age groups had no significant difference. ConclusionAge is not the independent risk factor to affect the feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy, but the strictly preoperative comorbidities assessment is necessary.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and security of laparoscopic Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD)or laparoscopic pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPPPD)for the patients with periampullary diseases, estimate the ratio of postoperative complications between LPD and LPPPD. MethodsFourty-five patients who underwent the LPD or LPPPD from January 2010 to March 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. These patients were divided into LPD group and LPPPD group basing on the Whipple or polyrus preservation. ResultsAmong these 45 patients, 25 patients were performed the LPD, the other 20 patients were performed the LPPPD. There were 25(55.56%)complications after operation, including 10 cases of pancreatic fistula, 1 case of bile leakage, 6 cases of delayed gastric emptying, 3 cases of infection, 2 cases of stomach intestine stomatorrhagia, 1 case of mesenteric venous thrombosis, 1 case of ascites, 1 case of chylous fistula. The complication rate had no significant difference between two groups. One patient died after operation in the LPPPD group. ConclusionLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible in the treatment of periampullary diseases, the LPPPD could partly prevent the occurrence of reflux of the digestive juice following the resection of pylorus and improve the quality of life.
Objective To analyze the effect of inner diameter of pancreatic duct following pancreaticoduodenectomy on pancreatic fistula. Methods From January 1995 to December 2008, 256 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were divided into four groups based on the types of pancreaticojejunostomy: end-to-side “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (n=115), end-to-end “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (n=71), end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy group (n=43) and pancreaticogastrostomy group (n=27). Alternatively, 238 patients were divided into two groups according to drainage ways: stenting tube for internal drainage group (n=132) and stenting tube for external drainage group (n=106). Furthermore, 233 cases were divided into three groups on the basis of inner diameter of pancreatic duct: ≤0.2 cm group (n=54), 0.2-0.4 cm group (n=93) and ≥0.4 cm group (n=76). Then, the incidence rate of pancreatic fistula of each group was compared. Results The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 8.20% (21/256). The incidence of pancreatic fistula for different types of pancreaticojejunostomy was as follow: end-to-side “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (7.83%， 9/115), end-to-end “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (7.04%, 5/71), end-to-end pancreaticogastrostomy invaginated group (13.95%, 6/43) and pancreaticogastrostomy group (3.70%, 1/27), in which there wasn’t significant difference in 4 groups （χ2=2.763，P=0.430）. There was no significant difference of the incidence of pancreatic fistula between stenting tube for internal drainage group (9.10%, 12/132) and stenting tube for external drainage group (8.49%, 9/106), χ2=0.126, P=0.722. The incidence of pancreatic fistula in ≥0.4 cm group, 0.2-0.4 cm group and ≤0.2 cm group was respectively 0, 15.05% (14/93) and 11.11%(6/54), and the difference was significant (χ2=12.009, P=0.002). No correlation was found between the incidence of pancreatic fistula of different inner diameter of pancreatic duct and the types of pancreaticojejunostomy (χ2=1.878， P=0.598). Conclusion The inner diameter of pancreatic duct is an important factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula. No relationship is found between the types of pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreatic fistula in this study.