Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbarspondylolisthesis. Methods From February 2003 to March 2006, 37 lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated with this operation, including21 males and 16 females and aging 3969 years.The affected lumbars were L3(3cases)，L4(23 cases), and L5(11 cases). According to the Meyerdingevaluating system, 12 cases were lassified as degree Ⅰ, 20 cases as degree Ⅱ,and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index were measured before operation, and 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up 336 months. There were statistically significant differences in Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index between before operation and 2 weeks after operation (P＜0.05),and no statistically significant differences between 2 weeks and 3 months afteroperation(P＞0.05). According to Dewei Zhou’s creterior for scoring, the results were excellent in 27 cases， good in 8 cases，and fair in 2 cases. Theexcellent and good rate was 94.6%. All of the embedded osseous were fused. Thefusing time was from 3 to 8 months (mean 3-9 months). There were no breakageof screw and rod. The position and configuration of the whole cages were good. Conclusion Applying the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage may achieve synergism in the treatment of lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis. Above procedure is served as solid internal fixationand offers a satisfactory reduction, and can improve the fusion rate of the spine. So it is an ideal procedure and worthily recommended method for treatment oflumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.
Objective To summarize research progress on application of Cup-cage reconstruction in revision of chronic pelvic discontinuity (CPD) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Relevant literature at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed to summarize the principles of the Cup-cage reconstruction, preoperative patient assessment, intraoperative skills, clinical and radiological effectiveness, limitations, and postoperative complications. Results For the treatment of CPD, the Cup-cage reconstruction achieved long-term acetabular cup bone ingrowth, CPD healing, and biologic fixation of the prosthesis by restoring pelvic continuity. Preoperative evaluation of the surgical site and general condition is necessary. The main intraoperative objectives are to reconstruct pelvic continuity, restore the center of rotation of the hip, and avoid neurovascular injury. Current studies have demonstrated significant clinical and radiological effectiveness as well as acceptable prosthesis survival rates after operation. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence regarding the staging of CPD, the optimal surgical approach and internal fixation, and the factors influencing postoperative prosthesis survival remain undefined. Conclusion Cup-cage reconstruction can be an effective treatment for CPD after THA, but there is still a need to explore CPD staging, Cup-cage approach and internal fixation, and influencing factors on prosthesis survival.
In order to identify whether the regeneration of costal cartilage is the basis of post-surgical repair of pectus excavatum and thoracic cage remodeling, 151 cases were followed up for 0.25 to 14 years. The main procedures in treatment were 3 steps: To curve the mental strut as a bow, to repair the perichondrium as a tube, and to persist in post-operative therapy. The results showed that regeneration of the costal cartilages appeared 3 months postoperatively in the cases treated by this method. It was concluded that a satisfactory thoracic cage could be remodeled by improving the technique of repairing pectus excavatum and persisting in postoperative therapy according to the regeneration regularity.
ObjectiveTo measure anatomical parameters related to cervical uncovertebral joint and provide data support for the design of uncovertebral joint fusion cage.MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, raw DICOM data of cervical CT scan in 60 patients (30 males and 30 females, aged 39-60 years) were obtained, then the three-dimensional cervical spine model was reconstructed for anatomical measurement by using the Mimics19.0 software. The height of the uncinate process, the length of the uncinate process, the width of the uncinate process, and the length of the uncovertebral joint in the intervertebral foramen region were measured bilaterally from C3 to C7. The anterior and posterior distances between the uncinate processes were measured from C3 to C7. The height of the uncovertebral joint space, the central height of the intervertebral disc space, and the depth of the intervertebral disc space were also measured from C2, 3 to C6, 7. The mean, standard deviation, maximum, and minimum were calculated by using the SPSS22.0 statistical software for the design of uncovertebral joint fusion cage.ResultsThe height of the uncinate process, the length of the uncinate process, the width of the uncinate process, and the length of the uncovertebral joint in the intervertebral foramen region of C3-C7 and the height of the uncovertebral joint space of C2, 3-C6, 7 showed no significant difference between two sides (P>0.05). The height of the uncovertebral joint space also had no significant difference between females and males (P>0.05). The anterior distances between the uncinate processes of C3-C7 were significantly larger than the posterior distances between the uncinate processes (P<0.05), the uncovertebral joint presented a posterior cohesive shape. The central height of the intervertebral disc space in male group was slightly higher than that in female group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05) at C2, 3 and C5, 6; the depth of the intervertebral disc space in male group was significantly higher than that in female group (P<0.05). The central height of the intervertebral disc space was (4.94±0.49) mm (range, 3.81-5.90 mm), the depth of the intervertebral disc space was (15.78±1.23) mm (range, 12.94-18.85 mm), the anterior and posterior distances between the uncinate processes were (17.19±2.39) mm (range, 13.39-24.63 mm) and (10.84±2.12) mm (range, 7.19-16.64 mm), respectively. According to the results of the anatomical research, the height of the uncovertebral joint fusion cage was designed as 5, 6, 7, and 8 mm; the depth of the uncovertebral joint fusion cage was designed as 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 mm; the width of the uncovertebral joint fusion cage was designed as 14-18 mm; and the two wings are designed as arc-shape with 2 and 3 mm in width.ConclusionThere are certain differences in the anatomical parameters of the uncovertebral joint between different segments. The uncovertebral joint fusion cage that designed based on the results of anatomical research is suitable for most patients.
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the midterm efficacy of superelastic cage implantation for the treatment of osteonecrosisof femoral head (ONFH). Methods From July 1996 to January 1998, 54 patients (75 hips) of ONFH were treatedwith superelastic cage and followed up. Among 54 patients, 5 patients were lost to follow up and 3 patients were dead of myocardialinfarction, renal failure and gastric cancer, respectively. Forty-six patients completed follow up including 32 males and14 females, aged from 21 to 61 with an average of 39 years old. Twenty-nine hips were classified as Ficat Stage Ⅱ and 36 as StageⅢ . Harris score was 58.20 ± 13.82. All patients were evaluated both cl inically and radiographically. Results Postoperatively,forty-six patients (65 hips) were followed up for 86 to 125 months with an average of 8 years and 8 months. Harris score was 80.78 ± 18.77. Twenty-nine hips were rated excellent, 21 good, 2 fair and 13 poor．A total of 76.9% of overall cl inical results were rated as good or excellent. Eight hips (12.3%) with the cage broken were turned to total hip replacement. Radiographicevaluation: 16 hips (24.6%) rated as grade Ⅰ , 34 (52.3%) grade Ⅱ and 15 (23.1%) grade Ⅲ . Conclusion Superelastic cage implantation is one of alternative treatments for ONFH at early and midterm stages. However, long-term follow-up is needed to know whether it is able to cure ONFH and whether cages will be broken as time passes by.
Objective To assess the mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods A retrospective study was made on 48 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent anterior decompression and fusion with n-HA/PA66 cage between August 2008 and January 2010. There were 33 males and 15 females with an average age of 54.5 years (range, 42-72 years). The disease duration was 3-12 months (mean, 6 months). The affected segments included 35 cases of single segment (C3, 4 in 7, C4, 5 in 18, and C5, 6 in 10) and 13 cases of double segments (C3-5 in 7 and C4-6 in 6). Of 48 patients, 28 was diagnosed as having intervertebral disc protrusion, 12 as having ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, and 8 as having vertebral osteophyte; 35 patients underwent single segmental anterior corpectomy and fusion, and 13 patients underwent single segmental anterior discectomy and fusion. The pre- and post-operative radiographs (cervical anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and three-dimensional CT scans) were taken to measure the segmental height and lordosis angle. Brantigan et al assessment standard and visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate the graft fusion and the improvement of clinical symptoms, respectively. Results All patients were followed up for 46 months on average (range, 36-54 months). No cage breaking, displacement, or sliding was found. At last follow-up, 36 cases were rated as Brantigan grade E, 10 cases as grade D, and 2 cases as grade C; the fusion rate was 96%. Both segmental height and lordosis angle were corrected significantly at immediate and 6 months after operation and last follow-up than those before operation (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found among different time points after operation (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, the cage subsidence was (1.3 ± 1.0) mm. The VAS and JOA scores at 6 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05), and the scores at last follow-up were superior to ones at 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with the n-HA/PA66 cage in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy is satisfactory because it can effectively restore and maintain segmental height and lordosis angle and promote osseous fusion.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness between anterior cervical Zero-profile interbody fusion device (Zero-P) and anterior cervical plate device (plate cage benezech, PCB) for cervical disease. MethodsBetween February 2011 and January 2013, 98 patients with cervical spondylosis who accorded with the inclusion criteria were treated with Zero-P in 49 cases (group A) and with PCB in 49 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease type, disease duration, and disease segments between 2 groups (P>0.05). The Cobb angle, short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36 scale), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, postoperative dysphagia cases, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss of group A were significantly less than those of group B (t=4.089, P=0.000;t=3.587, P=0.001). The patients were followed up 3-36 months (mean, 18.5 months). No loosening or breaking of internal fixation and bone absorption or collapse occurred in the other patients except 2 patients who suffered from screw loosening at 3 months after operation. Within 6 months after operation, dysphagia occurred in 8 cases (16.33%) of group A and in 13 cases (26.53%) of group B, showing significant difference (χ2=10.616, P=0.001). At last follow-up, JOA score, VAS score, NDI, SF-36 scale, and Cobb angle were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05);the other indexes of group A were significantly better than those of group B (P<0.05) except SF-36 scale and Cobb angle (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of JOA score was 81.63% in group A and 71.43% in group B, showing significant difference (χ2=4.346, P=0.037). ConclusionZero-P and PCB can get good results in treatment of cervical disease, but the Zero-P is better than PCB in reducing postoperative dysphagia because less wounds and strong stability.
For rat spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments, due to the lower main magnetic field strength, shallower detected depth and poor spatial compatibility of the traditional radio frequency (RF) coil, the image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of rat spinal was rather lower. In this paper, a RF coil for rat spinal MRI at 9.4 T was developed to improve the image quality and at the same time to avoid the space limitation while scanning in special conditions (cardiac catheterization, etc.). In this article, open birdcage structure was built and magnetic field distribution was calculated. The phantom and rat spine MRI imaging were experimented at 9.4 T to verify the advantage of the coil in rat spine MRI application.
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of expandable pedicle screw (EPS) combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From June 2004 to March 2008, 23 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesiswere treated, including 9 males and 14 females aged 24-72 years old (average 48.7 years old). The course of the disease varied from 6 months to 6 years (average 30.4 months). There were 18 cases of degenerative spondylol isthesis and 5 of isthmic spondylolisthesis, including 1 case at L3,4 level, 14 at L4,5 level, and 8 at L5 and S1 levels. There were 17 cases of grade I, 4 of grade II, and 2 of grade III (including 1 case of recurrent L5 spondylolysis) according to Meyerding classification system. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed using 48 PLIVIOS interbody fusion cages, and spondylolisthesis reduction and internal fixation were conducted using 84 pieces of EPS. The indications for use of EPS were initial operation with bone mass reduction or osteoporosis, reoperation of previous pedicle instrumentation, intraoperative screw relocation, sacral anchoring, and construct reinforcement. Cl inical outcomes, radiographic reduction of spondylol isthesis and bone fusion of lumbar interbody were evaluated based on JOA score, Boxall index, and Cook criteria. Results The incision healed by first intension in all cases except for one revision case that suffered from postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and obtained delayed-healing without infection 23 days after operation using conservative treatment. No operative compl ications such as nerve and organ injuries were found.All cases were followed up for 12-39 months (average 17.8 months). X-ray exams of spine AP, lateral, fully extended position and fully flexed position view showed all 84 EPS were fully expanded within vertebral body. The improvement rate of JOA at the final follow-up visit was markedly effective in 14 cases, and effective in 5 cases, and noneffective in 4 cases, with a total effective rate of 82.61%. Anatomic reduction was achieved in 14 cases, improvement was obtained in 6 cases, no improvement was observed in 3 cases, and the reduction rate was 86.69%. Lumber interbody fusion was achieved in 20 cases, fixation was achieved in 2 cases, failure was observed in 1 cases, and the fusion rate was 86.69%. Conclusion EPS in complex with interbody fusion cage provides effective reduction, internal fixation and interbody fusion for the reconstruction of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Objective To summarize the effect of cage height on outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion surgery and the importance of the cage height selection. Methods The related literature was widely reviewed to summarize the research progress on the complications caused by inappropriate height of the cage and the methods of selecting cage height. Results Inappropriate height of the cage can lead to endplate injury, cage subsidence, internal fixation failure, adjacent segmental degeneration, over-distraction related pain, insufficient indirect decompression, instability of operation segment, poor interbody fusion, poor sequence of spine, and cage displacement. At present, the selection of the cage height is based on the results of the intraoperative model test, which is reliable but high requirements for surgical experience and hard to standardize. ConclusionThe inappropriate height of the cage may have an adverse impact on the postoperative outcome of patients. It is important to develop a selection standard of the cage height by screening the related influential factors.