Objective To summarize the research progress of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors before liver transplantation of liver cancer. Method The literatures on the application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors before liver transplantation of liver cancer were collected and reviewed. Results PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors preoperatively treated liver transplantation recipients had a low incidence of postoperative rejection, and routine usage of hormone and immune tolerance induction therapy in liver transplantation recipients might reduce the incidence of rejection caused by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Conclusion Preoperative usage of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have more benefits than risks for patients with advanced liver cancer.
Most immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) resulted from excessive immune response against normal organs. The severity, timing, and organs affected by these events were often unpredictable. Adverse reactions could cause treatment delays or interruptions, in rare cases, pose a life-threatening risk. The mechanisms underlying irAE involved immune cell dysregulation, imbalances in inflammatory factor expression, alterations in autoantibodies and complement activation, even dysbiosis of intestinal microorganisms. However, the mechanisms of irAE occurrence might differ slightly among organs due to variations in their structures and the functions of resident immune cells. Future research should focus on the development of targeted drugs for the prevention or treatment of irAE based on the mechanisms by which irAE occurs in different organs. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying irAE occurrence would aid clinicians in effectively utilizing ICIs and provide valuable guidance for their clinical application.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although improvement has been achieved in platinum-based chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors-based molecular targeted therapy, they still have limitations. Immunotherapy has recently emerged as a very effective new treatment, and there is now growing enthusiasm in cancer immunotherapy worldwide. We summarized the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials, and the current status and progress of anti programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents in lung cancer treatment. Attention has been paid to finding out the factors which influence the therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and reducing the occurrence of adverse events.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy, safety, and problems of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their combination with other therapies in treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodThe relevant literatures on the clinical trials of ICIs and their combination therapy in patients with advanced HCC in recent years were collected and reviewed.ResultsThe therapeutic effects of programmed death receptor 1 and its ligands and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials of patients with advanced HCC were better, but the therapeutic effect of single drug was limited. Double immunotherapy and its combination with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors, molecular targeted drugs, and local therapy might make patients achieve more remarkable therapeutic effects, especially in combination with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors.ConclusionICIs could remarkably improve survival prognosis of patients with advanced HCC, combined immunotherapy has better survival benefits.
ObjectiveTo review the present situation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and discuss the advance of combined immunotherapy.MethodsThe relevant literatures on researches of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced HCC were retrieved to make an review.ResultsImmunotherapy intervention had been becoming a novel and promising therapeutic approach for HCC, which could suppress the progression of aggressive tumor and could inhibit tumor recurrence and metastasis shown in some pre-clinical trials. Other studies had found that the combined strategy of specific immunotherapy and conventional therapies could significantly improve the clinical outcomes of HCC patients.ConclusionCombined immunotherapy can significantly improve the clinical outcomes of HCC and benefit more patients with advanced HCC.
Objective To summarize the research status and prospect of immunotherapy for biliary tract cancer (BTC). Method The literatures about immunotherapy of BTC at home and abroad in recent years were reviewed. Results Surgical resection was still the first choice and only radical treatment for BTC. However, the recurrence rate of BTC was high, and most of the patients were in the middle and late stage with metastasis and lose the opportunity of operation. Patients with local progression, metastasis or recurrence could only receive chemotherapy and other comprehensive treatment, but they could not get satisfactory results. The continuous update of targeted drugs brings new hope for drug therapy of BTC, and immunotherapy had become a new treatment of tumor targeted therapy following radiotherapy and chemotherapy. ConclusionImmunotherapy can be used as an option for the treatment of advanced BTC and its postoperative recurrence and metastasis, and has attracted more and more attention.
ObjectiveTo investigate feasibility, safety, and problems to be solved in treatment with programmed death receptor protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody for patients with recurrent liver cancer after liver transplantation (LT).MethodAll of the domestic and foreign cases reports about the application of PD-1 monoclonal antibody in the patients with recurrent liver cancer after the LT were analyzed and summarized.ResultsIn six patients with recurrent liver cancer after the LT who received the PD-1 monoclonal antibody, the acute graft rejections were observed in 3 patients, 2 patients had the progressive disease but there was no evidence of the graft rejection, 1 patient achieved the complete response and there was no evidence of graft rejection and no side effects.ConclusionsAt present, effect of PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy is still not sure in patients with recurrent liver cancer after LT. If PD-1 monoclonal antibody is used off-label, close surveillance is needed to discovery possible acute graft rejection.
ObjectiveTo recognize the latest research progress of immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). MethodThe domestic and international literature on immunotherapy for AGC in recent years were retrieved and reviewed. ResultsThe immunotherapy for AGC mainly focused on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), cellular immunity, and antitumor vaccines. The most immunotherapy researched was ICIs, especially for programmed death protein-1 / programmed death protein ligand 1, cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4, and lymphocyte activating gene 3. The cellular immunotherapy and tumor vaccine therapy were less relatively. Although immunotherapy alone did not have a particularly good effect, its therapeutic effect was not inferior to that of chemotherapy alone and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower. Moreover, most studies had concluded that the use of immunotherapy in combination with other therapy had shown a good clinical efficacy, especially in combination with anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting Claudin 18.2 site had promising results in the AGC. ConclusionsWith the development of immunotherapy research, the strategies of immunotherapy for AGC are also constantly improving. Precision medicine is important in the process of immunotherapy. Targeted screening suitable patients and adopting precise treatment can further benefit the survival of patients with AGC.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although surgery can cure some early-stage resectable patients, the postoperative recurrence rate remains as high as 30%-55%. Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, which includes "neoadjuvant" therapy before surgery and "adjuvant" therapy after surgery, has significantly improved survival outcomes in resectable NSCLC patients. Large clinical studies, such as CheckMate 816, have demonstrated the superiority of neoadjuvant ICIs combined with chemotherapy in increasing the pathological complete response rate (pCR) and prolonging event-free survival (EFS). However, even with these advanced treatments, some patients do not achieve long-term benefits and experience early recurrence. This paper reviews the latest research progress of perioperative ICIs in NSCLC treatment, particularly the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in improving pCR and extending EFS. It further explores the recurrence patterns, resistance mechanisms, and potential biomarkers in NSCLC patients after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. By integrating basic research and clinical data, we analyze the mechanisms of early recurrence following perioperative immunotherapy and discuss future research directions and therapeutic strategies, providing new insights into precision treatment and recurrence prevention for NSCLC patients.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Methods The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for triple-negative breast cancer from inception to April 1, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 13 RCTs involving 5 416 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) (OR=2.09, 95%CI 1.37 to 3.19, P<0.01), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.75, 95%CI 0.67 to 0.83, P<0.01) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.87, 95%CI 0.79 to 0.96, P<0.01) were significantly better than those in the control group. The results of subgroup analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in PFS (P<0.01) and OS (P=0.02) between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients, but there was no statistically significant difference in pCR between PD-L1-positive patients and PD-L1-negative patients (P=0.36). There was a statistically significant difference in pCR between node-positive patients and node-negative patients (P=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in pCR between patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors (P=0.32); and there was no significant difference in PFS (P=0.19) or OS (P=0.99) between patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors. Compared with those in the control group, the incidences of serious adverse events (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.70, P<0.01) and immune-related adverse events (RR=2.98, 95%CI 1.66 to 5.35, P<0.01) were higher in the experimental group, and the common immune-related adverse events were hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism.Conclusion The existing evidence shows that immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy are more effective than chemotherapy alone in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer, and the combination therapy has a higher incidence of adverse reactions. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.