ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of anatomical locking plate internal fixation combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in treatment of the Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures by comparing with the simple anatomical locking plate internal fixation.MethodsThe clinical data of 40 patients with Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures who met the criteria between February 2013 and January 2017 were analyzed. Eighteen cases were treated with anatomical locking plate internal fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction by using a suture anchor (reconstruction group), and 22 cases were treated only with anatomical locking plate internal fixation (non-reconstruction group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, causes of injury, associated injuries, time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, medical expense, postoperative coracoclavicular distance, Constant-Murley scores of injured side, and complications were recorded and compared between 2 groups.ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-27 months (mean, 16.3 months). One patient in reconstruction group had superficial wound infection. One patient in non-reconstruction group had pullout of screws from the distal fragment and reduction loss at 1 month postoperatively. The operation time and medical expense in reconstruction group significantly increased when compared with those in non-reconstruction group (P<0.05). All fractures in 2 groups achieved bony union at last follow-up. The rate of coracoclavicular distance increase of injured side in non-reconstruction group was significantly higher than that in reconstruction group (t=2.371, P=0.023). The Constant-Murley scores at 1 month, 3 months after operation, and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values in 2 groups (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed between 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionBoth anatomical locking plate internal fixation with and without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction can achieve good effectiveness for the Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures. Therefore, the coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction is not necessary, except for comminuted fractures with the length of lateral fragment less than 1 cm or the patients with poor compliance.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of using a composite loop plate to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligament around the coracoid process and using a clavicular hook plate for fixation in treatment of Rockwood type III acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 60 patients with Rockwood type Ⅲ acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were admitted between June 2022 and September 2023 and met the selection criteria. Among them, 30 patients were treated with loop plate fixation (loop plate group) and 30 with clavicular hook plate fixation (hook plate group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, disease duration, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, and Constant-Murley score. The incision length, operation time, length of hospital stay, and the occurrence of complications during follow-up period were recorded. The Constant-Murley score and VAS score were used to evaluate shoulder joint function and pain, and the differences (change values) of the indicators between before operation and at 6 months after operation were calculated for inter-group comparison. In the loop plate group, the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) on the anteroposterior X-ray films of the acromioclavicular joint was measured at 1 day and 6 months after operation to assess the loss of acromioclavicular joint reduction. Results The incision length of the loop plate group was significantly shorter than that of the hook plate group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time and the length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention after operation. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 16.3 months). There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between groups (P>0.05). The Constant-Murley scores and VAS scores of both groups significantly improved at 6 months after operation compared with those before operation (P<0.05); the differences in the change values of the two indicators between groups were significant (P<0.05). The CCD of the loop plate group were (10.40±0.83) mm at 1 day and (10.70±0.68) mm at 6 months and no repositioning loss was observed. Three cases in the hook plate group had residual shoulder joint pain after operation. The difference in the accidence of complications between groups was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For Rockwood type Ⅲ acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation, compared with the clavicle hook plate, the composite loop plate for reconstructing the coracoclavicular ligament around the coracoid process has the advantages of simple operation, safety, minimally invasive, good functional recovery, and fewer complications. Moreover, it avoids the need for a second surgery to remove the internal fixation device, and the patient acceptance and satisfaction are higher.
Objective To investigate the necessity of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fracture with locking plate. Methods We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database and VIP database for all the articles about the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures using locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction or locking plate alone from the establishment of databases to November 30th, 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected the documents that met the requirements of this paper, and extracted the effective data after evaluating the quality of the documents, including the Constant-Murley score, coracoclavicular distance, fracture healing time, complication rate, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and the Visual Analogue Scale score of postoperative pain. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 retrospective cohort studies were included, and the overall quality of the literature was high. A total of 421 cases were included in this study, including 209 cases in the locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction group and 212 cases in the locking plate group. The results of meta-analysis showed that locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures was superior to locking plate alone in the Constant-Murley score [mean difference (MD)=7.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.84, 11.87), P=0.001], coracoclavicular distance [MD=–1.22 mm, 95%CI (–1.92, –0.53) mm, P=0.0006], fracture healing time [MD=–2.76 weeks, 95%CI (–4.74, –0.79) weeks, P=0.006] and complication rate [odds ratio=0.31, 95%CI (0.14, 0.68), P=0.004], but the former had longer operative time [MD=9.27 min, 95%CI (4.53, 14.01) min, P=0.0001]. There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss [MD=3.31 mL, 95%CI (–17.01, 23.63) mL, P=0.75], incision length [MD=0.30 cm, 95%CI (–0.11, 0.71) cm, P=0.15], or Visual Analogue Scale score of postoperative pain [MD=–0.26, 95%CI (–0.79, 0.27), P=0.33]. Conclusions Although the reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament increases the time of surgery, locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures is significantly better than locking plate alone in terms of reduction quality, shoulder function recovery, fracture healing time, and the incidence of complications, without significant intraoperative bleeding, prolonged incision or postoperative pain.