The quality of disinfectant, disinfection devices and disposable medical devices is closely related to the patients' safety. Hospital infection management department must carry out the audit responsibilities for qualification documents of disinfectant, disinfection devices and disposable medical devices, to guarantee legality, safety and effectiveness of products used in hospital. This paper mainly introduces the implementation of qualification documents audit in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, including system construction, process reengineering, documents audit scope and key points, and document management.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the high-level disinfection effect of flexible endoscopes in the Endoscopy Center of the First People’s Hospital of Longquanyi District of Chengdu, explore the key links of flexible endoscope cleaning and disinfection, and provide theoretical guarantee and technical support for the next step of the endoscope center work.MethodsWe sampled and monitored the lumens, water and air injection ports and biopsy ports of 19 flexible endoscopes after high-level disinfection in the Endoscopy Center of the First People’s Hospital of Longquanyi District of Chengdu. A total of 307 specimens were collected from 108 flexible endoscopes. We compared the disinfection effects of different flexible endoscopes and different sampling sites, and compared the microbial detection status of different flexible endoscopes.ResultsThe qualified rates of disinfection of gastroscopes, colonoscope and duodenoscopy were 79.22%, 86.21% and 100.00%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.721). The qualified rates of disinfection of the endoscopic lumen, water and air injection port and biopsy port were 87.04%, 93.00% and 94.95%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=4.585, P=0.101). The qualified rates of the lumen, water and air injection port and biopsy port of gastroscope, colonoscope and duodenoscope were 84.42%, 93.10%, 100.00%, 92.96%, 92.59%, 100.00%, 94.29%, 96.30%, 100.00%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the disinfection effect of various parts of different flexible endoscopes (P>0.05). Bacteriological identification showed that of the 28 specimens with excess bacteriological standards, 16 gram-positive bacteria (57.1%), and 12 gram-negative bacteria (42.9%) were found.ConclusionThe cleaning and disinfection effect of flexible endoscopes has certain defect. Endoscope should be treated in strict accordance with the technical specifications for cleaning and disinfection of the flexible endoscope to further improve the disinfection effect of the flexible endoscope.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficiency of hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) in disinfecting multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).MethodsWe searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database for before-after studies or case-control studies or cohort studies evaluating efficiency of HPV and published from January 2010 to December 2020 (the time range was from January 2000 to December 2020 in the snowball searching). RevMan 5.4 and R 4.0.2 softwares were used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 9 studies were included, consisting of 8 before-after studies and 1 cohort study. Six studies evaluated positive rate of environmental samplings, meta-analysis revealed that HPV combined with manual cleaning disinfected the environment efficiently [relative risk (RR)=0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.01, 0.08), P< 0.000 01] and HPV was more efficient than manual cleaning [RR=0.04, 95%CI (0.02, 0.10), P< 0.000 01]. Three studies evaluated the hospital-acquired MDROs colonization/infection rates, and the results of the 3 studies were consistent, revealing that HPV could reduce hospital-acquired MDROs colonization/infection rates.ConclusionHPV is efficient in reducing MDROs contaminated surfaces and hospital-acquired infection rate.
ObjectiveTo investigate the problems in the use of quick-drying hand disinfectants and formulate intervention measures to improve the hand hygiene compliance of nursing staff.MethodsFrom February 2014 to June 2016, the hand hygiene compliance of nursing staff was continuously observed according to the hand hygiene observation table recommended by the World Health Organization. The questionnaire on the use of quick-drying hand disinfectants, which passed the reliability and validity test, was used to find out the reasons leading to the low compliance rate of hand hygiene among nurses, and pertinent interventions were formulated. From November 2016 to December 2017, intervention measures were gradually implemented throughout the hospital, and the hand hygiene compliance of nursing staff was continuously observed again. Then we compared the compliance rate of hand hygiene and the compliance rate of hygienic hand disinfection among nurses in the second quarter of 2016 (before intervention) with those in the last quarter of 2017 (after intervention).ResultsThe compliance rates of hand hygiene and hygienic hand disinfection among nurses before intervention were 62.15% and 49.77%, respectively, and those after intervention were 91.64% and 90.80%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionThe factors affecting the hand hygiene compliance of nursing staff are identified through questionnaires and targeted intervention measures have effectively improved the hand hygiene compliance rate of nursing staff.
ObjectiveTo study the effect of PDCA cycle model on the standardization of the application of common disinfectants, in order to promote the management level of hospital disinfection. MethodsBy questionnaire and observation, the study was to learn the knowledge and its application in medical workers on common disinfectants. Based on the results, we tried to regulate effective preventive measures and carry out continuous improvements. ResultAfter the implementation of PDCA cycle model, the awareness rate of the medical staff on disinfection and the application accuracy of disinfectants were significantly increased (P<0.05). ConclusionThe implementation of PDCA cycle model can improve nosocomial infection management level effectively, ensure medical quality management and patients' safety, which is an effective way of management to reduce the rate of nosocomial infection.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is one of the main methods for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract and pancreatic diseases. Compared with other digestive endoscopes, duodenoscopy has a special structure. Since the outbreaks of nosocomial infections caused by the transmission of multidrug-resistant organism through duodenoscopy in 2010, the reprocessing and design of digestive endoscopes represented by duodenoscopy have faced new challenges. This article reviews the international advances in duodenoscopy reprocessing in the past 10 years including the structural characteristics of duodenoscope, related infection outbreak cases, outbreak control measures, and the use of disposable duodenoscopy, so as to provide guidance and reference for the duodenoscopy reprocessing and related nosocomial infections prevention and control work in China.
Objective To study the disinfection effect of hand disinfectants containing alcohol after heating, and the comfortable feeling of using warm disinfectants among the medical staff in operation rooms. Methods Between November 2016 and January 2017, we analyzed the disinfection effect of two alcohol-containing hand disinfectants after heating in operation rooms through on-the-spot disinfection and inspection. Questionnaire was used to investigate the comfortable feeling of using warm hand disinfectants. Results After standing for 7 days at a temperature of 37℃, the major content of the two disinfectants decreased by less than 10%. Three minutes of disinfection by using the two kinds of disinfectants had an average natural-bacteria killing logarithm higher than 1.00, and they both had a qualified disinfection effect. Moreover, 96.7% of the medical personnel believed that warm disinfection products were more comfortable. Conclusion After heating, the two kinds of alcohol-containing hand disinfectants are effective in hand disinfection and more comfortable to use, which can improve hand hygiene compliance in surgical staff.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the safety of hand disinfectants. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, INAHTA, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect studies on the safety of hand disinfectants from inception to February 1st, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies; then, a systematic review was conducted. ResultsA total of 50 studies were included. The reported adverse events were eye and nasal mucosal irritation, hand adverse events with skin itching, rash, erythema, edema and so on. A total of 29 brands such as 3M Avagard and 26 ingredients such as ethanol were reported to be related to the above adverse events. Hand disinfectants containing glycerin, silicone oil, vitamin B, plant extracts and other emollients could reduce the incidence of adverse events. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that hand disinfectants containing emollients and free from ethanol, chlorhexidine and other ingredients are related to fewer adverse events. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore a better hygienic hand disinfection method to improve hand hygiene compliance, by evaluating and comparing the disinfection effects and the economic and time cost expenditures of three different types of hygienic hand disinfection methods.MethodsFrom March to July 2016, patients undergoing blood collection were randomly divided into three groups, and five blood collection nurses used one different type of hygienic hand disinfection method in each group when performing blood collection operation on the patients, including: direct hygienic hand disinfection (group A); wearing gloves, and doing hygienic hand disinfection without putting off gloves (group B); and changing gloves for each patient, and doing hygienic hand disinfection after putting off gloves (group C). Two hundred and ten specimens of the nurses’ hands or gloves surface after hand hygiene were collected from each group for the comparison of hygienic hand disinfection effect, and the differences in economic cost and time cost were compared.ResultsThe passing rates of the disinfection effect of the three different types of sanitary hand disinfection methods were all 100%. The economic cost of group A, B, and C was 9.66, 21.98, and 185.66 yuan, respectively, and the time cost of group A, B, and C was 5 250, 6 860, and 14 700 seconds, respectively. No sharp injury occurred.ConclusionSince direct hygienic hand disinfection does not implement the standard prevention principle, the method of wearing gloves and doing hygienic hand disinfection without putting off gloves is the best in the three different hygienic hand disinfection methods, which not only has the same disinfection effect, but also can save economic cost and time cost, which may improve the medical personnel’s hand hygiene compliance.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of disinfection measures in the isolation ward of ICU in severe patients infected with the Omilkerong variant of the new coronavirus, and to optimize the infection control measures. MethodsReferring to the patient's epidemiological and nucleic acid sample data, nucleic acid sampling was performed on the isolated ward environment by surface sampling method, and the nucleic acid Ct value of virus was detected by parallel fluorescence PCR method. The aerosol was collected by a wet-wall cyclone sampler, and the nucleic acid Ct value of the virus was detected by parallel fluorescence PCR. ResultsBefore daily disinfection, SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were found on the surface of the patient's ward and air sampling after the tracheoscopic tracheostomy. No positive samples of SARS-CoV-2 were found on the surface of articles and air in the patient's ward after daily disinfection. ConclusionThe daily disinfection measures of the hospital can achieve the effect of SARS-CoV-2 disinfection, which suggests that the surface of the articles in the ward after invasive operations such as tracheostomy and tracheoscopy, especially within 2 meters of the tracheostomy and the tracheostomy, is the key part of disinfection, which needs to be paid attention to.