ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors affecting the occurrence of infectious complications after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and to establish a risk prediction Nomogram model. MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of 429 primary gastric cancer patients who underwent radical resection for gastric cancer at the Second Department of General Surgery of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected to explore the influencing factors of infectious complications using multivariate logistic regression analyses, and to construct a prediction model based on the results of the multivariate analysis, and then to further validate the differentiation, consistency, and clinical utility of the model. ResultsOf the 429 patients, infectious complications occurred in 86 cases (20.05%), including 53 cases (12.35%) of pulmonary infections, 16 cases (3.73%) of abdominal infections, 7 cases (1.63%) of incision infections, and 10 cases (2.33%) of urinary tract infections. The results of multivariate logistic analysis showed that low prognostic nutritional index [OR=0.951, 95%CI (0.905, 0.999), P=0.044], long surgery time [OR=1.274, 95%CI (1.069, 1.518), P=0.007], American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) grade Ⅲ–Ⅳ [OR=9.607, 95%CI (4.484, 20.584), P＜0.001] and alcohol use [OR=3.116, 95%CI (1.696, 5.726), P＜0.001] were independent risk factors for the occurrence of infectious complications, and a Nomogram model was established based on these factors, with an area under the ROC of 0.802 [95%CI (0.746, 0.858)]; the calibration curves showed that the probability of occurrence of infectious complications after radical gastrectomy predicted by the Nomogram was in good agreement with the actual results; the decision curve analysis showed that the Nomogram model could obtain clinical benefits in a wide range of thresholds and had good practicality.ConclusionsClinicians need to pay attention to the perioperative management of gastric cancer patients, fully assess the patients’ own conditions through the prediction model established by prognostic nutritional index, surgery time, ASA grade and alcohol use, and take targeted interventions for the patients with higher risks, in order to reduce the risk of postoperative infectious complications.
ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI), and to explore the risk factors for PONV. MethodA total of 220 patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from June 2022 to December 2022 were prospectively collected, and were randomly divided into the LSG group and the SASI group; the general condition of the patients was recorded. PONV was assessed on the POD0, POD1, POD2, POD30, POD60, POD90, using the Rhodes index score.ResultsThe total Rhodes index score in the LSG group was higher than that in the SASI group [(25.56±13.54) vs. (16.06±11.28), P＜0.05]. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that female (P=0.014), LSG (P＜0.001), young age (P=0.050), and low BMI (P=0.019) were risk factors for PONV. ConclusionsCompared with LSG, the Rhodes index score after SASI is low. For young women with low BMI, special attention should be paid to the prevention and treatment of PONV after LSG.
Objective To investigate for a reasonable reconstruction method in patients undergoing total gastrectomy. Methods Data of 63 cases receiving total gastrectomy from January 2000 to October 2005 in Ganzhou District Hospital of Zhangye City were analyzed retrospectively, and the patients were divided into double pouch jejunum interposition （DPJI） group (n=30) and Roux-en-Y ρ pouch （RYρ） group (n=33) according to the operation methods, then operation time， morbidity of complications, amount and frequency of meat and drink, complications of digestive tract, amount of total protein and albumin were compared between two groups. Results There were no significant differences in operation time，morbidity of complications, the amount or frequency of meat and drink between two groups (Pgt;0.05); but the incidence of digestive tract complications of DPJI group was lower than that of RYρ group （P＜0.05). GradeⅠ/Ⅱof Vervaeck index and the amount of total protein and albumin in DPJI group were statistical significantly higher than those of RYρ group （P＜0.05）. Conclusion Functional DPJI is a reasonable digestive tract reconstruction method.
Metabolic and bariatric surgery has continued to evolve under the dual imperatives of efficacy and safety. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with transit bipartition (SG-TB), derived from SG, reconstructs a “dual-channel” pathway that preserves the pylorus and proximal small-bowel function, while aiming to achieve metabolic effects comparable to biliopancreatic diversion with fewer severe nutritional complications. In 2025, the first Chinese expert consensus on SG-TB was released, and the inaugural international SG-TB consensus meeting was convened in Europe, reaching preliminary alignment on procedure classification, key technical parameters, and indications/contraindications. Emerging clinical evidence indicates that SG-TB confers advantages in weight reduction, remission of type 2 diabetes, and prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and also demonstrates feasibility in revisional surgeries and complex cases. Nevertheless, current studies are predominantly observational, with limited evidence quality and considerable heterogeneity. Stratification of surgical parameters and establishment of reproducible training systems remain unmet needs. Building upon a synthesis of national and international consensus statements and recent clinical advances, this commentary further analyzes the challenges that SG-TB faces in procedural heterogeneity, evidence accumulation, individualized practice, and mechanistic research. This commentary seeks to offer practical reference and research directions for the bariatric community, ultimately supporting the advancement of SG-TB from a promising technique toward standardized and mainstream adoption.
ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy, and to evaluate whether MLNR can be used as a reference tool to guide the formulation of postoperative adjuvant treatment strategies and prognosis prediction of gastric cancer.MethodsThe clinicopathologic features of patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy from January 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The factors influencing the disease specific survival of gastric cancer were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model, then the variables with statistical significance in multivariate analysis were included in the construction of nomograms model for prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.ResultsA total of 262 patients with gastric cancer were included. There was no correlation between MLNR and total number of lymph nodes (rs=0.037, P=0.547), there was a positive correlation between MLNR and pN stage (rs=0.909, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that pT stage, pN stage, MLNR, and postoperative chemotherapy were the independent predictors of prognosis of gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy. Four variables including pT stage, pN stage, postoperative chemotherapy, and MLNR were included in the construction of nomogram model, the C index of MLNR and pN stage model was 0.707 and 0.692 respectively. Survival analysis showed that the higher the MLNR, the worse the prognosis.ConclusionsThe ability of MLNR to predict prognosis of gastric cancer might be better than pN stage. Therefore, it is considered that MLNR could be used as an important evaluation tool to guide adjuvant treatment and prognosis prediction after radical gastrectomy.
ObjectiveTo analyze short-term outcomes of hand assisted laparoscopic (HAL) D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and summarize clinical experiences. MethodsThe clinical data of 199 patients with gastric cancer undergoing D2 radical distal gastrectomy from December 2010 to December 2013 in this hospital were analyzed. HAL (HAL group, n=92) and traditonal open (TO group, n=107) D2 radical distal gastrectomy were performed. The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between these two groups. ResultsThere was no residue of cancer cells at the surgical margin in the HAL group and the TO group. Compared with the TO group, the average incision length was obviously shorter (P < 0.01) and the average intraoperative blood loss was obviously less (P < 0.05) in the HAL group. The average operation time, the average number of lymph nodes harvested, and the average postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between the HAL group and the TO group (P > 0.05). One case was died of unknown gastrointestinal bleeding in the HAL group and the TO group, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was 9.78% (9/92) in the HAL group and 11.21% (12/107) in the TO group, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). ConclusionsHAL D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer don't increase operation time. It has some advantages of minimal invasion and safety as compared with traditional open surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) based on delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. MethodsNinety patients with gastric cancer who treated in our hospital from December 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-five patients with gastric cancer received delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy by using laparoscopic linear stapler after they were treated with TLDG and D2 lymphadenectomy (TLDG group), while 45 patients with gastric cancer received laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and D2 lymphadenectomy (LADG group). The operative time, digestive tract reconstruction time, blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, length of proximal and distal margin to the cancer, time of the first flatus, recovery time of drinking water, time of resuming semi-fluid diet, postoperative hospital stay, and complications during follow-up period were observed and evaluated. Results① Intraoperative findings. The operative time, digestive tract reconstruction time, and length of distal margin to the cancer of TLDG group were significantly longer than those corresponding index of LADG group (P < 0.050), but the blood loss was significantly less than that of LADG group (P < 0.050). There was no significant difference between two groups in proximal margin to the cancer and number of dissected lymph nodes (P > 0.050). ② Postoperative findings. There was no significant difference between two groups in time of the first flatus, recovery time of drinking water, time of resuming semi-fluid diet, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of complication (P > 0.050). All patients were followed for 6-16 months (median with 10 months), and there was no one suffered from recurrence, anastomotic stricture, and anastomotic obstruction. ConclusionThe TLDG based on delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy in the treatment of gastric cancer was feasible and safe, and it will be an ideal method for digestive tract reconstruction in patients with gastric cancer, so it is worthy to clinical application.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the research progress in the selection of metabolic bariatric procedures, efficacy, safety, complication prevention, and long-term management for elderly patients, so as to provide references for surgical decision-making and perioperative management in future metabolic and bariatric surgery for elderly obese patients. MethodA review of recent domestic and international literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery in elderly patients was conducted. ResultsWith the intensification of societal aging, the incidence of obesity and related metabolic diseases among the elderly population has significantly increased. Metabolic and bariatric surgery has been proven to effectively reduce weight and improve obesity-related metabolic diseases in elderly patients. Current guidelines no longer consider age an absolute contraindication for surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly used procedures internationally. SG is superior to RYGB in terms of surgical safety, while RYGB has greater advantages in improving metabolic diseases. Although the postoperative mortality and complications risks in elderly obese patients are higher than those in younger obese patients, strict preoperative assessment and individualized procedure selection can significantly reduce these risks. ConclusionsMetabolic and bariatric surgery can serve as an effective treatment for elderly obese patients, offering comprehensive benefits in weight loss and metabolic improvement. Procedure selection requires individualized assessment, balancing the patient’s baseline condition and metabolic needs. Postoperative success hinges on systematic long-term follow-up and management to ensure sustained benefits and safety. Future efforts should focus on clarifying the definitions or standards of “elderly” and “obesity,” followed by more large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled studies to validate the safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric surgery.
With the swift evolution of bariatric and metabolic surgery, additional procedures building upon sleeve gastrectomy have consistently surfaced. Recent studies suggest that sleeve gastrectomy with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB) yields superior short-term weight reduction outcomes compared to sleeve gastrectomy alone, with weight loss and glycemic control effects akin to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and without significant complications. As a result, SG-JJB is regarded as a safe and efficacious bariatric procedure, noted for its technical simplicity and reversibility, presenting substantial clinical utility. Nonetheless, high-quality, multicenter, large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials are essential to further ascertain its long-term efficacy and safety, and to facilitate its standardized implementation. This article seeks to review the advancements in SG-JJB research, evaluate its effectiveness and safety in managing obesity and associated comorbidities, and explore its future developmental trajectory.
ObjectiveTo measure gastric wall thickness in patients with obesity and to investigate the relation between gastric wall thickness and clinicopathologic characteristics. MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of the patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from February to August 2023 were collected. The gastric wall thickness of the gastric tissue specimens resected following LSG was measured by a tissue measuring device at 3 predetermined positions (gastric antrum, gastric body, and gastric fundus) at a compressive pressure of 8 g/mm2, and multiple linear regression was used to analyze the factors affecting the thickness of the gastric wall. ResultsA total of 232 patients were collected in this study, including 49 males and 183 females. Preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 28.2–61.8 kg/m2 with (38.4±5.3) kg/m2, and the patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 were 82 cases and <40 kg/m2 were 150 cases. The thickness of the gastric wall in the gastric antrum, gastric body, and gastric fundus of 232 patients was (3.04±0.38) mm, (2.26±0.51) mm, and (1.63±0.32) mm, respectively. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that the thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric antrum was related to the gender of the patients, that is, the thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric antrum was thinner in the females as compared with the males (standard coefficients β=–0.152, t=–2.167, P=0.031), while the thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric fundus was related to the BMI of the patients, and the higher BMI, the thicker thickness of the gastric wall at the gastric fundus (standard coefficients β=0.153, t=2.281, P=0.023). ConclusionsAccording to the results of this study, the thickness of the gastric wall is related to the anatomical position of the gastric wall. During LSG surgery, the size and height of the Staple lines are selected at different anatomical positions of the cutting edge for males and obese patients with higher BMI.