ObjectiveTo summarize the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function.MethodIn this paper, we reviewed and summarized the related literatures about the application of MRI in the field of pancreatic exocrine function evaluation in recent years.ResultsA variety of MRI techniques could be used to detect the pancreatic exocrine function. In addition to conventional MRI techniques, there were also MRI stimulated by pancreatic secretions, cine (dynamic) cholangiopancreatography based on space selective reverse recovery pulse, and so on.ConclusionThe new MRI techniques have potential for semi-quantitative and quantitative evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of CT, MRI, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of biliary obstruction.MethodsA total of 80 patients with biliary obstruction in our hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 were retrospectively collected. The patients were all examined by CT, MRI, and MRCP. The imaging images of all patients were interpreted by two radiologists with more than 5 years of working experience. Taking the results of operation and histopathology as the gold standard, the diagnostic value of CT, MRI+MRCP, CT+MRI+MRCP in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of biliary obstruction lesions were evaluated.ResultsCompared with the location results of surgery and histopathology, the coincidence rates of CT+MRI+MRCP and MRI+MRCP were higher than that of CT (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between CT+MRI+MRCP and MRI+MRCP (P>0.05); compared with the benign and malignant results of surgery and histopathology, the coincidence rates of CT, CT+MRI+MRCP and MRI+MRCP were close, and there was no statistical significance among them (P>0.05).ConclusionsMRI+MRCP and CT+MRI+MRCP have the same value in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of biliary obstruction. However, MRI+MRCP have the advantages ofnon-radiation or contrast media, it is more suitable for patients who are worried about the impact of radiation, have contrast media allergy or renal insufficiency.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in preoperative Bismuth-Corlette classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). MethodsA total of 53 HCCA patients confirmed by postoperative pathology were retrospectively included. The accuracy of two sequence combinations, namely dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) + magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and DCE-MRI + MRCP + DWI, in evaluating the longitudinally involved bile duct segments and Bismuth-Corlette classification of HCCA was compared. Additionally, the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and tumor Bismuth-Corlette classification as well as degree of differentiation was analyzed. ResultsThere were 318 bile duct segments in 53 HCCA patients. The accuracy rate of DCE-MRI + MRCP was 93.7% (298/318), the sensitivity was 91.5% (161/176), and the specificity was 96.5% (137/142); The accuracy rate of DCE-MRI + MRCP + DWI was 96.5% (307/318), the sensitivity was 96.0% (169/176), and the specificity was 97.2% (138/142). The accuracy of DCE-MRI + MRCP + DWI was higher than that of DCE-MRI + MRCP, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=275.902, P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of DCE-MRI + MRCP + DWI was 0.966 [95%CI (0.940, 0.983), P＜0.000 1], and its diagnostic efficacy was superior to that of DCE-MRI + MRCP [AUC=0.940, 95%CI (0.908, 0.963), P＜0.000 1]. The DeLong test indicated a statistically significant difference in AUC between the two sequences (Z=2.633, P=0.008 5). The accuracy rates of preoperative Bismuth-Corlette classification of HCCA evaluated by DCE-MRI + MRCP and DCE-MRI + MRCP + DWI were 86.8% (46/53) and 94.3% (50/53), respectively. After adding the DWI sequence, the consistency between Bismuth-Corlette classification results and surgical pathological classification results (Kappa=0.922, P<0.001) was higher than that of DCE-MRI + MRCP sequence (Kappa=0.820, P<0.001), with a statistically significant difference (χ2=160.370, P<0.001). In addition, the ADC value of HCCA was negatively correlated with tumordegree of differentiation (rs=–0.524, P<0.001), but had no significant correlation with its Bismuth-Corlette classification (rs=–0.058, P=0.682). ConclusionsDCE-MRI + MRCP + DWI sequence can effectively improve the accuracy in preoperative evaluation of the involvement of bile duct segments and Bismuth-Corlette classification of HCCA, which provides guidance for precise preoperative surgical planning in clinical practice. In addition, the ADC value can provide additional information required for non-invasive preoperative prediction of the prognosis of HCCA patients.