Objective To analyze the relationship between age and prognosis of colorectal patients in the database from colorectal cancer (DACCA). Methods The DACCA version selected for this data analysis was updated on January 5, 2022. The data items analyzed included age, sex, tumor site, tumor pathological nature, obstruction, pathological TNM (pTNM) stage, positive lymph node ratio, survival status and survival time. According to China’s age segmentation standard, the included data were grouped into younger group (<35 years old), middle-aged group (35–59 years old) and elderly group (>59 years old). Overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DFS) were analyzed in three age group, and OS and DSS in three age group were analyzed in pTNM stage stratification. Results Three thousand six hundred and twenty-five rows of data were obtained from DACCA database according to the screening conditions. The survival analysis results of different age groups show that: The middle-aged group had better OS compared with the elderly group at 1-year (97.4% vs. 96.0%, P=0.037), 3-year (90.9% vs. 88.0%, P=0.030) and 5-year (81.7% vs. 75.7%, P=0.002). Also, the middle-age group had better 5-year DSS (82.2% vs. 77.7%, P=0.020). There was no statistical difference in survival between the younger group and the elderly group (P>0.05). The survival analysis results of different age groups in each pTNM stage show that: ① The middle-aged group had better medium-term and long-term OS than the elderly group. In the pTNM Ⅰ stage, the 3- and 5-year OS in the middle-aged group were better than those in the elderly group (100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.004; 100% vs. 91.4%, P=0.005). In the pTNM Ⅱ stage, the 5- and 10-year OS in the middle-aged group were better than those in the elderly group (96.5% vs. 91.3%, P=0.018; 88.2% vs. 54.3%, P<0.001). In pTNM Ⅲ stage, 10-year OS in the middle-aged group was better than that in the elderly group (36.5% vs. 36.0%, P<0.001). In pTNM Ⅳ stage, the 5- and 10- year of OS in the middle-aged group were better than those in the elderly group (67.7% vs. 58.4%, P=0.016; 19.1% vs. 7.2%, P=0.049). ② The middle-aged group had better medium-term and long-term DSS than the elderly group. In the pTNM Ⅰ stage, the 3- and 5- year DSS in the middle-aged group wrer better compared to the elderly group (100% vs. 96.9%, P=0.047; 100% vs. 94.9%, P=0.049). In the pTNM Ⅱ stage, the 10-year DSS in the middle-aged group outperformed that in the elderly group (88.2% vs. 61.9%, P=0.002). In the pTNM Ⅳ stage, the 5- and 10-year DSS in the middle-aged group were better than the elderly group (68.3% vs. 59.1%, P=0.020; 20.9% vs. 7.7%, P=0.040). ③ Except pTNM I stage, there was no significant difference in survival of other pTNM stages between young group and old group (P>0.05). In the pTNM Ⅰ stage, 3- and 5- year OS were better in the younger group compared with the elderly group (100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.004; 100% vs. 91.4%, P=0.005), and better 3- and 5- year DSS in the younger group (100% vs. 96.9%, P=0.047; 100% vs. 94.9%, P=0.049). Conclusions The age of colorectal cancer patients may have an impact on long-term survival. Middle-aged patients have better prognosis compared with elderly patients, and the younger group patients have better prognosis in pTNM stage Ⅰ only.
ObjectiveTo explore transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) influences on prognosis of patients with BCLC stage 0–A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of BCLC stage 0–A HCC patients underwent the radical resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2006 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into a preoperative TACE treatment group (PTT group, n=365) and a directly surgical resection group (DSR group, n=365). The Kplan-Meier method was used to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) between the two groups. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze whether the preoperative TACE was an independent factor affecting the prognosis of patient with BCLC stage 0–A HCC.ResultsA total of 465 patients with BCLC stage 0–A HCC were enrolled, including 365 patients in the DSR group and 100 patients in the PTT group. The baseline data of the two groups were similar（P>0.050）. In the cohort, the 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-year OS rates and DFS rates were 95.3%, 83.5%, 74.3%, 56.8% and 88.0%, 63.8%, 51.1%, 36.4%, respectively in the DSR group, which were 92.7%, 72.9%, 52.3%, 35.3% and 78.1%, 54.2%, 40.4%, 31.2%, respectively in the PTT group. The Kplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the OS and DFS in the DSR group were significantly better than those in the PTT group (P=0.009, P=0.033). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed that the preoperative TACE was the independent risk factor for the poor prognosis in the patients with BCLC stage 0–A HCC [ HR=1.389, 95% CI (1.158, 2.199), P=0.021].ConclusionsFor patients with BCLC stage 0–A HCC, preoperative TACE doesn’t improve patient’s prognosis and might reduce survival rate. If there is no special reason, direct surgery should be performed.
ObjectiveTo analyze the relation between marital status and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA). MethodsThe DACCA version selected for this data analysis was updated on January 13, 2023. The data items analysis included the age, gender, marital status, tumor location, tumor property, pathological TNM (pTNM) stage, survival status, and survival time. According to the marital status, the patients were assigned into five marital statuses: the first marriage, unmarried, divorced, remarriage, and widowed groups. The overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) of the 5 marital statuses were analyzed, and then the risk factors affecting OS and DSS were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. ResultsA total of 7 373 data were obtained from the DACCA according to the screening conditions, of which 6 696 (90.8%) were first marriage, 108 (1.5%) were unmarried, 198 (2.7%) were divorced, 22 (0.3%) were remarriage, and 349 (4.7%) were widowed. The OS and DSS curves had no statistical differences among the CRC patients with 5 marital statuses (χ2=2.692, P=0.611; χ2=2.927, P=0.570). The 3-year cumulative overall survival rate and disease specific survival rate among the 5 marital status patients had statistical differences among the patients with five marital statuses (χ2=24.65, P<0.001; χ2=18.63, P=0.001), further pairwise comparison showed that the 3-year cumulative overall survival rate and disease specific survival rate in the CRC patients with first marriage were higher than those in the widowed patients (Z=3.36, P<0.01; Z=3.02, P<0.01). The multivariate analysis results by the Cox proportional hazards regression model did not find the marital status was associated with the OS and DSS (P>0.05). ConclusionsFrom the real-world analysis results of this study, it is found that 3-year cumulative overall survival rate and disease specific survival rate in patients with first marriage are higher as compared with widowed patients. It is necessary to pay more attention to the long-term follow-up of CRC patients in unmarried or widowed status.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors associated with prognosis of appendiceal adenocarcinoma using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MethodsThe patients pathologically diagnosed with appendiceal adenocarcinoma from 2005 to 2015 were extracted from the SEER database and then randomly divided into a training cohort and validation cohort in a 7∶3 ratio. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed in the training cohort to identify the independent risk factors for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Based on these factors, a nomogram prediction model was constructed and subsequently internally validated. The statistical significance was defined as α=0.05. ResultsA total of 749 patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma were enrolled, with 524 in the training cohort and 225 in the validation cohort. The multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that the T, N, M stages, and surgery as the independent prognostic factors for both overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Additionally, the age was identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, and tumor size for cancer-specific survival. Based on these factors, the nomogram prediction models for the overall survival rate and cancer-specific survival rate were developed. The nomogram of overall survival rate achieved a C-index of 0.716 [95%CI=(0.689, 0.743)] in the training cohort and 0.695 [95%CI=(0.649, 0.740)] in the validation cohort, while the nomogram of cancer-specific survival rate showed C-index values of 0.749 [95%CI=(0.716,0.782)] and 0.746 [95%CI=(0.699, 0.793)], respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 0.780 [95%CI=(0.739, 0.821)] and 0.773 [95%CI=(0.732, 0.814)] respectively in the training cohort, were 0.789 [95%CI=(0.726, 0.852)] and 0.776 [95%CI=(0.715, 0.837)] respectively in the validation cohort, which for 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 0.813 [95%CI=(0.768, 0.858)] and 0.796 [95%CI=(0.753, 0.839)] respectively in the training cohort, were 0.813 [95%CI=(0.750, 0.876)] and 0.811 [95%CI=(0.750, 0.872)] respectively in the validation cohort. The calibration curves demonstrated good agreements between predicted and observed outcomes for both overall survival rate and cancer-specific survival rate. ConclusionsThrough analysis results of appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients from the SEER database reveal that advanced T, N, and M stages, as well as lack of surgery are significant risk factors for both overall survival and cancer-specific survival. The constructed nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates, which incorporate these risk factors, demonstrate strong predictive accuracy.
ObjectiveTo explore the immune biomarkers for prognosis of breast cancer and to construct a risk assessment model.MethodsThe gene expression of breast cancer samples was retrieved from The Cancer Genome Map (TCGA) database and immune related genes (IRGs) were retrieved from the ImmPort database. Cox proportional hazards regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used for prognostic analysis. Gene set enrichment analysis ( GSEA) was used to explore biological signaling pathways. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms were used to explore the relationship between risk score and tumor immune microenvironment.ResultsNine kinds of immune-related differentially expressed genes independently related to prognosis were identified: adrenoceptor beta 1 (ADRB1), interleukin 12B (IL12B), syndecan 1 (SDC1), thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), fatty acid binding protein 7 (FABP7), interferon epsilon (IFNE), tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 18 (TNFRSF18) and interleukin 27 (IL27). The risk assessment equation constructed by these nine kinds of genes had powerful predictive ability. The “neurotrophin signaling pathway” and “adipocyte factor signaling pathway” were activated in patients of high-risk group, and “leukocyte transendothelial migration” “WNT signaling pathway” “FcεRI signaling pathway” “valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis” and “protein export pathway” were activated in patients of low-risk group. A variety of tumor-killing immune cells were significantly enriched in the tumor-infiltrating immune cells of patients in the low-risk group. The immunosuppressive immune cells were significantly enriched in tumor infiltrating immune cells of patients in high-risk group.ConclusionIRGs prognostic signatures are an effective potential predictive classifier in breast cancer treatment.
ObjectiveTo compare the long-term survival of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with surgical versus non-surgical treatment. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of elderly patients aged ≥70 years with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy or radiotherapy/chemotherapy at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2009 to September 2017. Patients were divided into a surgical group (S group) and a non-surgical group (NS group) according to the treatment method. The propensity score matching method was used to match the two groups of patients at a ratio of 1∶1, and the survival of the two groups before and after matching was analyzed. ResultsA total of 726 elderly patients with ESCC were included, including 552 males and 174 females, with 651 patients aged ≥70-80 years and 75 patients aged ≥80-90 years. There were 515 patients in the S group and 211 patients in the NS group. The median follow-up time was 60.8 months, and the median overall survival of the S group was 41.9 months [95%CI (35.2, 48.5)], while that of the NS group was only 24.0 months [95%CI (19.8, 28.3)]. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the S group were 84%, 54%, and 40%, respectively, while those of the NS group were 72%, 40%, and 30%, respectively [HR=0.689, 95%CI (0.559, 0.849), P<0.001]. After matching, 138 patients were included in each group, and there was no statistical difference in the overall survival between the two groups [HR=0.871, 95%CI (0.649, 1.167), P=0.352]. ConclusionCompared with conservative treatment, there is no significant difference in the long-term survival of elderly patients aged ≥70 years who undergo esophagectomy for ESCC. Neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery is still an important choice to potentially improve the survival of elderly patients with ESCC.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of single and bilateral lung transplantation in the treatment of end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Chinese and English databases were searched by computer, including PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database and CBM. Case-control studies on single lung transplantation or bilateral lung transplantation for COPD were collected from the inception to July 31, 2022. We evaluated the quality of the literature via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). All results were analyzed using Review Manager V5.3 and STATA 17.0. Results A total of 8 studies were included covering 14076 patients, including 8326 patients in the single lung transplantation group and 5750 patients in the bilateral lung transplantation group. NOS scores were≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the postoperative 1-year survival between the two groups (P=0.070). The 2-year survival rate (P=0.002), 3-year survival rate (P<0.001), 5-year survival rate (P<0.001), overall survival rate (P＜0.001), postoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/predicted value (P<0.001), postoperative forced vital capacity (P<0.001), and postoperative 6-minute walking distance (P=0.002) were lower or shorter than those in the bilateral lung transplantation group, the postoperative intubation time (P=0.030) was longer than that in the bilateral lung transplantation group. Bilateral lung transplantation group showed better surgical results. There was no statistical difference in the mortality, obliterative bronchiolitis, length of hospitalization, primary graft dysfunction, or postoperative adverse events (P>0.05). Conclusion Bilateral lung transplantation is associated with better long-term survival and postoperative lung function compared with single lung transplantation. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications are similar between them.
ObjectiveTo establish an individualized nomogram model and evaluate its efficacy to provide a possible evaluation basis for the prognosis of lower third and abdominal part of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). MethodsLower third and abdominal part of EAC patients from 2010 to 2015 were chosen from the SEER Research Plus Database (17 Regs, 2022nov sub). The patients were randomly allocated to the training cohort and the internal validation cohort with a ratio of 7∶3 using bootstrap resampling. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine significant contributors to overall survival (OS) in EAC patients, which would be elected to construct the nomogram prediction model. C-index, calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed to evaluate its efficacy. Finally, the efficacy to evaluate the OS of EAC patients was compared between the nomogram prediction model and TNM staging system. ResultsIn total, 3945 patients with lower third and abdominal part of EAC were enrolled, including 3475 males and 470 females with a median age of 65 (57-72) years. The 2761 patients were allocated to the training cohort and the remaining 1184 patients to the internal validation cohort. In the training and the internal validation cohorts, the C-index of the nomogram model was 0.705 and 0.713, respectively. Meanwhile, the calibration curve also suggested that the nomogram model had a strong capability of predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of EAC patients. The nomogram also had a higher efficacy than the TNM staging system in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of EAC patients. ConclusionThis nomogram prediction model has a high efficiency for predicting OS in the patients with lower third and abdominal part of EAC, which is higher than that of the current TNM staging system.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the potential value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) as an indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe literatures were searched comprehensively in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, Wanfang, CNKI, and CQVIP databases from the establishment of the databases to May 20, 2021. The combined hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to evaluate the correlation between the CAR and the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or disease-free survival (DFS) in the patients with pancreatic cancer. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the non-randomized controlled studies, and the Stata SE 15.0 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 2 985 patients with pancreatic cancer were included in this meta-analysis of 15 studies. The results of meta-analysis showed that the higher CAR value, the shorter OS [effect size (ES)=0.60, 95%CI (0.50, 0.69), Z=12.04, P<0.001], DFS [ES=0.63, 95%CI (0.47, 0.78), Z=3.61, P<0.001], and PFS [ES=0.41, 95%CI (0.19, 0.63), Z=7.91, P<0.001] in the patients with pancreatic cancer. The results of subgroup analysis of OS according to different countries, sample size, mean age, follow-up time, CAR cut-off value, and NOS score showed that the higher CAR value was related to the shorter OS (P<0.05). The result of linear regression analysis showed that there was no correlation between the CAR cut-off value and lnHR of OS (r2=0.947, P=0.455). Conclusion From results of this study, CAR is closely related to OS of patients, and it is expected to be used as a new reference index for monitoring and judging prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer.
ObjectiveTo compare the the effectiveness of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), in stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma.MethodsFrom January 2012 to December 2018, 291 patients were included. The patients were allocated into two groups including a RATS group with 125 patients and a VATS group with 166 patients. Two cohorts (RATS, VATS ) of clinical stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma patients were matched by propensity score. Then there were 114 patients in each group (228 patients in total). There were 45 males and 69 females at age of 62±9 years in the RATS group; 44 males, 70 females at age of 62±8 years in the VATS group. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcomes.Results Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group got less blood loss (P<0.05) and postoperative drainage (P<0.05) with a statistical difference. There was no statistical difference in drainage time (P>0.05) or postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05) between the two groups. The RATS group harvested more stations and number of the lymph nodes with a statistical difference (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS and mean survival time (P>0.05). While there was a statistical difference in DFS between the two groups (1-year DFS: 94.1% vs. 95.6%; 3-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 75.2%; 5-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 68.4%, P<0.05; mean DFS time: 78 months vs. 63 months, P<0.05) between the two groups. The univariate analysis found that the number of the lymph nodes dissection was the prognostic factor for OS, and tumor diameter, surgical approach, stations and number of the lymph nodes dissection were the prognostic factors for DFS. However, multivariate analysis found that there was no independent risk factor for OS, but the tumor diameter and surgical approach were independently associated with DFS.ConclusionThere is no statistical difference in OS between the two groups, but the RATS group gets better DFS.