ObjectiveTo observe the medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior release internal distraction in treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis. MethodsBetween March 2009 and March 2012, 26 patients with severe and rigid scoliosis were treated with anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and two stage posterior spinal fusion. There were 11 males and 15 females with an average age of 19.6 years (range, 14-25 years). The average disease duration was 13.6 years (range, 3-24 years). All cases were idiopathic scoliosis. Of 26 cases, 2 cases were rated as Lenke type I, 8 as type Ⅱ, 13 as type IV, 1 as type V, and 2 as type VI. The apical vertebrae located at T6 in 1 case, at T7 in 3 cases, at T8 in 7 cases, at T9 in 13 cases, and at T10 in 2 cases. The average 4 vertebral bodies were released by anterior approach, and average 14 vertebral bodies were fused after posterior surgery. Fourteen patients received 2 times distraction. Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire was used to access health-related quality of life. The radiological parameters were measured, including coronal plane Cobb angel of major curve, apical vertebral translation (AVT), C7 plumb line-center sacral vertical line (C7PL-CSVL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and thoracic kyphosis (TK) at pre-and post-operation. ResultsThe average total operation time was 592.7 minutes; the average total blood loss volume was 1 311.2 mL; and total hospitalization cost was (14.7±1.4)×104 yuan RMB. The coronal plane Cobb angle of major curve was (55.7±16.5)°, and the TK was (43.2±16.2)° after first distraction. The patients were followed up 2-5 years (mean, 3.8 years). Temporary dyspnea and pleural effusion occurred in 1 case respectively after distraction, and symptoms disappeared after symptomatic treatment. Screw loosening and pseudoarthrosis formation was observed in 1 case at 6 months after fusion, good recovery was achieved after revision. No infection or neurological complication was found. The coronal plane Cobb angel of major curve, TK, and AVT after fusion and at last follow-up were significantly lower than preoperative ones (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between at post-fusion and last follow-up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in C7PL-CSVL and SVA between at pre-and post-operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, SRS-22 questionnaire scores were 4.32±0.42 for active degree, 4.54±0.58 for mental health, 3.97±0.76 for self-image, 4.09±0.64 for pain, and 4.03±0.83 for satisfaction degree. ConclusionAnterior release internal distraction can provide satisfactory correction results for severe and rigid scoliosis with higher safety and lower incidence of complication.
ObjectiveTo summarize research progress of quality of life in patients after colorectal cancer surgery.MethodsThe literatures about quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer surgery in recent years are reviewed.ResultsQuality of life had became an important criterion for evaluating the therapeutic effect and prognosis of cancer. At present, the assessment tools for the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients mainly included the universal scale [such as Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)], the applicable scales for cancer patients [such as European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: quality of life questionaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: quality of life questionaire-CR38 (EORTC QLQ-CR38)], and the special scales for stoma patients represented by City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (COH-QOL-OQ), Stoma Quality Of Life (Stoma-QOL), Stoma Quality Of Life Scale (SQOLS), and so on. The short-term quality of life of colorectal cancer patients was lower at 1 month after operation and recovered at 3 months after operation. Five years after surgery, attention should also be paid to the long-term quality of life. Besides, postoperative quality of life of colorectal cancer patients was affected by age, occupational status, economy, preoperative physical activity level, psychological and social factor, personality, surgical method, co-morbidity, complication, stoma, and so on.ConclusionsUnderstand the longitudinal changes and influencing factors of patients’ quality of life after operation, grasp the time point of effective intervention, and select appropriate assessment tools are necessary for medical staff. It is of great significance to further optimize the clinical management pathway and improve the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer after operation.
Objective To explore the impact of the severity of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) on the quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. Methods Literatures published from January 2012 to August 2020 in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, WanFang and other databases were searched according to the search terms. Study screened, data extracted, and quality evaluated were conducted by three reviewers independently, and the RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Seven studies, involving 1 616 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the functional scores (including overall health status, physiological functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning) of patients with major LARS were lower than those of patients with no/minor LARS (P<0.001). Except for appetite loss, the symptom score (including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain), shortness of breath, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties of patients with major LARS were higher than those of patients with no/minor LARS (P<0.01). Conclusion Major LARS has a greater impact on the quality of life of patients after surgery than no/minor LARS.
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of surgical treatment on early postoperative anal function in left colon cancer patients with acute complete obstruction. MethodsThe clinical data of left colon cancer patients with acute complete obstruction were retrospectively chosen from January 2017 to June 2020 in Yibin Second People’s Hospital. The patients were grouped according to the treatment plan including emergency operation group (54 cases), stent+operation group (46 cases) and stent+neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)+operation group (44 cases). The anal function was evaluated at 4 weeks, 1 month and 6 months after operation, and quality of life was evaluated at 12 months after operation. Unconditional logistic regression model was used to explore the factors influencing early postoperative anal function injury. Results The proportion of open surgery in the emergency operation group was statistically higher than the stent+operation group and stent+NAC+operation group (P<0.05). The low anterior rectum resection syndrome (LARS) score at 4 weeks after operation of the emergency operation group was statistically higher than those of the stent+operation group and stent+NAC+operation group (P<0.05). However there was no statistical difference in LARS score at 1 month and 6 months after operation among the three groups (P>0.05). The score of social function in the emergency operation group at 12 months after operation was statistically lower than those of the stent+operation group and stent+NAC+operation group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) ≥24 kg/m2, emergency operation, and Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) score were the risk factors for early postoperative anal dysfunction in the left colon cancer patients with acute complete obstruction (P<0.05). ConclusionsLeft colon cancer patients complicated with acute complete obstruction who only received emergency surgery, BMI≥24 kg/m2, or one score of ECOG are more likely to have functional impairment, and the quality of life of those patients underwent emergency surgery alone is decreased. In addition, the stent placement at the obstruction site should be helpful to avoid the above problems.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences in patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. MethodsBreast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University and The People’s Hospital of Shanxi Province from March to June 2021 were selected as the research objects by convenient sampling method. Self-designed questionnaires were used to evaluate the general situation of the patients. Patients’ satisfaction and quality of life were investigated by using the postoperative scale of the BREAST-Q module of total mastectomy (to investigate patients after total mastectomy) and the postoperative scale of the breast-conserving plastic surgery module (to investigate patients after breast-conserving surgery), and the patient-reported outcomes of total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery were compared, including breast satisfaction, psychosocial health, chest and upper limb physical health, sexual health, medical team satisfaction, and information satisfaction. ResultsIn this study, there were 100 patients in the total mastectomy group and 50 patients in the breast conserving group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in marital status, monthly family income, education, body mass index, whether combined with other physical diseases, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, axillary lymph node dissection, tumor stage, and molecular typing (P>0.05). The rates of radiotherapy and endocrine therapy in the breast conserving group were higher than those in total mastectomy group ( χ2=48.701, P<0.001; χ2=15.891, P<0.001). The scores of quality of life and patient satisfaction scores of the breast conserving group including breast satisfaction, satisfactions of breast doctors, nurses and other doctors, social and mental health, sexual health score were higher than those of the total mastectomy group (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the physical health of chest and upper limbs score between the two groups (P>0.05). In addition, the satisfaction score of radiotherapy information in the breast conserving group was 69.40±20.44 and that of medical information given by breast surgeons was 87.04±19.46. ConclusionScores of breast satisfaction, psychosocial health, sexual health, and health-related quality of life in breast-conserving patients are higher than those in total mastectomy patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the correlation between readiness for hospital discharge and short-term quality of life among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode.MethodsSurveys of 127 CRC patients following ERAS mode were conducted in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale and EORTC QLQ-C30 Scale were issued at the discharge and 1 month after the operation, respectively.ResultsThe total score of RHDS was 149.43±33.25. The score of global quality of life was 66.80±18.84. Correlation analysis showed that the total score of RHDS was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life (r=0.220, P=0.013), and negatively correlated with the scores of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, loss of appetite (r=–0.304, P=0.001; r=–0.189, P=0.033; r=–0.257, P=0.004; r=–0.254, P=0.004). The score of personal status dimension were positively correlated with the score of global quality of life and emotional function (r=0.213, P=0.016; r=0.197, P=0.027), and negatively correlated with scores of fatigue, pain and insomnia (r=–0.311, P=0.000; r=–0.264, P=0.003; r=–0.257, P=0.004). The score of knowledge dimension was negatively correlated with nausea and vomiting, pain and loss of appetite (r=–0.212, P=0.017; r=–0.182, P=0.040; r=–0.239, P=0.007). The score of coping ability dimension was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life and physical function (r=0.204, P=0.021; r=0.204, P=0.021), while negatively correlated with scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia and loss of appetite (r=–0.349, P=0.000; r=–0.240, P=0.007; r=–0.202, P=0.022; r=–0.201, P=0.024). The score of expected support was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life (r=0.220, P=0.013), and negatively correlated with scores of fatigue and loss of appetite (r=–0.249, P=0.005; r=–0.227, P=0.010).ConclusionsThe short term quality of life among CRC patients following ERAS keeps at upper middle level, and positively correlated with the readiness for hospital discharge. It is suggested that discharge preparation service is of great significance to improve the quality of life of patients.
Objective To explore the effect of sequential nutritional intervention mode on improving early postoperative nutritional status in patients with gastric cancer. Methods A total of 30 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ningbo No.2 Hospital between June and August 2022 were selected as the tiral group by convenience sampling, and another 30 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer between September 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively selected as the control group. The trial group received the sequential nutritional intervention model constructed by quality control circle activities in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, and the control group received routine nutritional support. The nutritional status and quality of life of the two groups were evaluated one month after discharge. Results Before intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score, serum albumin, serum prealbumin, body weight, or Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ C30) score between the two groups (P>0.05). After intervention, both groups showed improvements in PG-SGA score, serum albumin, and serum prealbumin compared to before intervention (P<0.05); there was no significant change in body weight in the trial group (P>0.05), while the control group experienced a decrease in body weight (P<0.05); the trial group showed an improvement in QLQ C30 score (P<0.05), whereas the control group did not show significant change in QLQ C30 score (P>0.05). Compared to the control group after intervention, the trial group showed better PG-SGA score (7.97±1.65 vs. 8.83±1.26), serum albumin level [(40.61±1.30) vs. (39.93±0.78) g/L], serum prealbumin level [(0.266±0.030) vs. (0.229±0.051) g/L], body weight [(63.12±7.39) vs. (58.17±9.18) kg], and QLQ C30 score (62.63±9.01 vs. 57.23±7.13), with all differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Sequential nutritional intervention model is helpful to improve the early nutritional status and quality of life of patients after radical gastrectomy, and has clinical promotion value.
Objective To compare the quality of life (QOL) of advanced Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma esophagogastric junction (AEG) patients treated by the total gastrectomy, traditional proximal gastrectomy or proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction opertations, and to provide some clinical basis for the choice of surgical methods for AEG. Methods A total of 90 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG were retrospectively collected from the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to different surgical methods (n=30 in each group), a total gastrectomy group (23 males, 7 females, aged 47-79 years), a traditional proximal gastrectomy group (treated with the traditional proximal gastrectomy procedure, 19 males, 11 females, aged 44-80 years), and a narrow gastric tube group (treated with the proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction procedure, 25 males, 5 females, aged 47-83 years). The Chinese version of Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophagogastric-25 (QLQ-OG25) designed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) were used to collect the patients’ information in the three groups about their QOL during the first six months and one year after the three procedures. Results There was no statistical difference in the clinical data among the three groups (all P>0.05). QOL during the first six months after the operations assessed by the QLQ-C30 questionnaire table showed that the narrow gastric tube group was significantly best in total QOL, physical function, fatigue, and emotional function among the three groups (all P<0.05). The total gastrectomy group was the worst in role function, dyspnea, fatigue and diarrhea among the three groups (all P<0.05). The traditional proximal gastrectomy group had a worse evaluation in lose of appetite than the other two groups (P<0.05). QOL during the first six months after the operations assessed by the QLQ-OG25 questionnaire table showed that the traditional proximal gastrectomy group had a significantly worse evaluation in palirrhea than the other two groups (both P<0.05). The total gastrectomy group had a significantly worse evaluation in anxiety than the other two groups (both P<0.05). QOL during the first year after the operations assessed by the QLQ-C30 questionnaire table showed that the narrow gastric tube group had a significantly highest evaluation in total QOL physical function and emotional function among the three groups (all P<0.05). The total gastrectomy group had a significantly worst evaluation in diarrhea among the three groups (P<0.05). QOL during the first year after operations assessed by QLQ-OG25 questionnaire table showed that the traditional proximal gastrectomy group had a significantly worse evaluation in palirrhea than the other two groups (all P<0.05). Conclusion The narrow tubular esophagogastric anastomosis is better than the total gastrectomy and the traditional proximal gastrectomy for the treatment of the advanced Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction, so this operation is worth being recommended.
ObjectiveTo compare the performance of 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) and World Health Organization quality of life-bref (WHOQOL-Bref) in assessing quality of life (QOL) in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). MethodsThe WHOQOL-Bref questionnaire and the SF-36 questionnaire were administered to patients with tuberculosis undergoing treatment from July to September 2013. The statistical methods of reliability analysis, factor analysis and the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis were used. ResultsIt showed that the WHOQOL-Bref and the SF-36 both had good reliability (Cronbach α=0.863 and 0.920, respectively). Constructive validity of the two instruments were checked by factor analysis and the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis, which indicated that both the two instruments had good validity. Among scales measuring similar concepts, many subscales of the SF-36 and the four domains of the WHOQOL-Bref unexpectedly had a fair correlation with one another. For example, the physical QOL, psychological QOL, and social relation QOL domains of the WHOQOL-Bref and physical functioning, mental health, and social functioning of the SF-36 were 0.482, 0.745, and 0.572, respectively. ConclusionThe WHOQOL-Bref and the SF-36 have an approximately equivalent practicability in assessing the quality of life in patients with TB.
ObjectiveTo investigate the supportive care needs (SCNs) and quality of life (QOL) of patients with thyroid cancer at different time points, and explore the trends and relation between the two. MethodsFrom April 2020 to July 2020, the convenience sampling method was used to select the patients with thyroid cancer that met the criteria, and the general data were collected before discharge. The 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 were used to investigate the SCNs and QOL of patients at preoperative 1 d and postoperative 2 d, 1 month and 6 months. ResultsA total of 102 patients met the criteria were included. Total score of SCNs (F=13.407, P<0.001) and the points of psychological (F=38.525, P<0.001), health information (F=7.935, P=0.006), physical and daily living (F=56.413, P<0.001), patient care and support (F=40.530, P<0.001) needs were statistically different at each time point. The highest need was the psychological need at preoperative 1 d, which was the health information need at each time point after operation, and total score of SCNs was the highest at postoperative 2 d. The points of physical function (F=18.490, P<0.001), cognitive function (F=86.943, P<0.001), emotional function (F=9.121, P=0.003), social function (F=7.117, P=0.009), and overall health status (F=3.156, P=0.039) were statistically different at each time point, which of the physical function, role function, emotional function, social function, and overall health status decreased to the lowest on day 2 after operation. The total score of SCNs at each time point was negatively correlated with the functional factors of the QOL and the overall health status score (P<0.05). ConclusionsThe SCNs and QOL of patients with thyroid cancer show different trends at different time points, and there is a correlation between the two. Medical staff needs to develop personalized interventions according to the different stages of the patients’ disease, and actively provide targeted support and care so as to improve their QOL.