Objective To investigate the current situation of randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trial (RCT/CCT) on chronic hepatitis B and whether to offer reliable evidence for clinical practice in China. Methods RCT/CCT identified from six Chinese clinical journals were searched manually and assessed according to international standard of evidence-based medicine. Results 308 issues containing 212 therapeutic articles and 88 RCT/CCT on chronic hepatitis B were identified and analyzed. Conclusion the quantity and quality of RCT/CCT of chronic hepatitis B did not meet the need of clinical practice.
Objective To assess the effect of different thrombolytic agents, and different regimens in acute ischaemic stroke. Methods A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs were identified from the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Embase (1980 to 1997), handsearching Japanese and Chinese journals, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials in patients with confirmed acute ischaemic stroke comparing different doses of a thrombolytic agent, or different thrombolytic agent, or the same agent given by different routes. Results Eight trials involving 1 334 patients were included. Concealment of allocation was generally adequate. All the trials were conducted in Japan. Different doses (of tissue plasminogen activator or urokinase) were compared in six trials. Different agents (tissue plasminogen activator versus urokinase,or tissue-cultured urokinase versus conventional urokinase) were compared in three trials. Few data were available for functional outcomes. A higher dose of thrombolytic therapy was associated with a five-fold increase in fatal intracranial haernorrhages (odds ratio 5.02, 95% confidence interval 1.56 to 16.18). There was a non-significant trend towards more early deaths or clinically significant intracranial haemorrhages in higher dose group. No difference in late deaths or extra-cranial haemorrhages was shown between low and higher doses. However, very few of these events occurred. No difference was shown between the different thrombolytic agents tested. Conclusions There is not enough evidence to conclude whether lower doses of thrombolytic agents might be safer or more effective than higher doses in acute ischaemic stroke. It is not possible to conclude whether one agent might be better than another, or which route of administration might be best.
To explore clinical design methods that suit the characteristics of acupuncture science, this article mainly analyzes the design features of pragmatic randomized controlled trials and the advantages and current problems in clinical research on acupuncture. We discuss the differences between pragmatic randomized controlled trials and explanatory randomized controlled trials and the application status of clinical research about acupuncture. We consider that pragmatic randomized controlled trials suit the characteristics of in clinical research on acupuncture with complicated interventions. Exploring the application of pragmatic randomized controlled trials clinical research on acupuncture is beneficial to exploring appropriate clinical research methods that suit the specific characteristics of acupuncture subject, and to objectively and comprehensively assessing clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture.
Objective To review systematically whether there is enough existing evidence that methylcobalamin is effective and safe in the treatment of the patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Methods A Cochrane systematic review of all relevant randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of methycobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy was performed. Clinical trials were searched from Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2004), the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978 to January 2004), the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (1989 to January 2004) and references of all included trials. The selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. The following outcomes were assessed: effectiveness of clinical signs and symptoms, sensory nerve and motor nerve conduction velocities and serious adverse events of methylcobalamin. Results Thirty randomized clinical trials including 1 949 patients met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the most included trials was of low level. The "funnel plot" of the comparison of thirteen studies of methylcobalamin with other B Vitamins studies showed symmetry, which indicated less possible publication bias and the result was partly reliable, but it could not indicate the whole publication biases. The results of meta-analysis indicated that methylcobalamin showed significantly positive effects on the improvement of the signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, and the effects were better than the other vitamin B agents. The increase of some nerves conduction velocities by methylcobalamin was better than by the other vitamin B. No serious adverse events were observed during the treatment period.Conclusions Methylcobalamin appears to be a safe and effective treatment on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, the evidence is not b because of the low quality of most trials. Rigorously designed, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of methylcobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are needed to further assess the effect.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for the design of clinical trials. Because of some practical difficulties, more and more researchers think that the appropriate use of non-randomized controlled trials may make up for the weakness of RCT and will achieve the same research purpose. Therefore, non-RCTs are also very important. Taking studies on multiple sclerosis for example, this article briefly introduces the significance of non-randomized contolled trials.
With increasing amount of attention being paid to single case randomized controlled trial (N-of-1 trials), sample size estimation has become an important issue for clinical researchers. This paper mainly introduces the model and hypothesis of N-of-1 trials. Based on the hypothetical model, sample size estimation methods of fixed model and random model are proposed. The premises of the model application, formulas and examples are then given. It is expected in case of conduction N-of-1 trials, the correct methods are used to estimate sample size and improve the research quality of N-of-1 trials.
Objective To assess the effects and safety of vasodilators for sudden sensorineurial hearing loss (SSHL). Search strategy Electronic databases: MEDLINE from 1966, EMBASE from 1974, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Chinese Bio-medicine Database from 1989. Hand search: Five kinds of Chinese otolaryngology journals were searched. Literature references were checked intensively. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials comparing vasodilators with placebo or other drugs in patients with SSHL. Data collection and analysis At least two reviewers independently assessed trials quality and extracted data. Main results Thirteen trials with 1 155 patients were eligible and included in the systematic review. Ten of the trials were from developed countries and them were from P. R. China. None of the four trials showed that the effects of vasodilators were better than placebo for SSHL. None of the seven trials showed that the effects of one kind of vasodilators were better than that of the other vasodilators. Two trials showed that other drugs, such as batroxobin and hypaque,were probably better than some vasodilators (dextran, papaverine, 654-2, danshen). Eight trials reported the side effects of vasodilators, such as pruritus, allergy, etc. Reviewers’ conclusions Base on the systematic review of current eligible randomized controlled trials, there is no evidence to prove that vasodilator therapy is better than placebo or other therapies for SSHL, or the effects of one kind of vasodilator are better than that of the other vasodilators. We can’t draw a reliable conclusion about the effects of vasodilators for SSHL at the moment. And we must pay attention to their potential adverse reactions.
Objective To investigate perindopiI influence for the complication in hypertensive patients with stroke history by lowering blood pressure. Methods One-hundred and fifty-five essential hypertensive patients with stroke history were randomly assigned to either perindopril group or placebo group, receiving a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial as long as 3 years. Their blood pressure, the morbidity and mortality of cardiocerebral complications were monitored. At the end of trial, three days Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring were performed. Result It was shown that in perindopril group blood pressure was controlled satisfactorily, and the morbidity and mortality of cardiocerebral incidences (6.85 % and 2.74 %repectively) were lower than those of placebo group (17.10% and 9.21% respectively). Conclusions Perindopril lowers blood pressure effectively and persistently. It has important clinical effect for prevention the cardiocerebral complications in hypertensive patients with stroke history by lowering blood pressure.
Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of non-gastrointestinal decompression after esophagectomy and the necessity of gastric tube or the time to remove gastric tube. Methods Thirty patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, were included in the trial from June to October 2017. The patients were randomly and equally assigned to a trial group (non-gastrointestinal decompression) or a control group (gastrointestinal decompression). There was no significant difference in age (P=1.000), sex (P=1.000), tumor location (P=0.732), pathological type (P=1.000), pathological stage (P=0.507), and operation time (P=0.674) between the two groups. The clinical effect between the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistical difference in incidences of anastomotic leakage (P=1.000), anastomotic bleeding (P=1.000), gastroesophageal reflux (P=1.000) between the two groups. And there was no statistical difference in time of the first flatus (P=0.629) and the first bowel movement (P=0.599) after operation between the two groups. Conclusion Without gastrointestinal decompression after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy does not increase the incidences of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding and gastroesophageal reflux, and has no significant effect on the recovery of gastrointestinal function. Without gastrointestinal decompression after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is safe and feasible. Removing gastric tube on the second day after operation is reasonable and feasible.
Objective To review the eradication rate for Helicobacter Pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy with Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC). Methods A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed according to International Cochrane Collaboration. Data Source RCTs were identified from specialized trials register of Cochrane U GDP Group, the Cochrane library, additional electronic search (including MEDLINE and CBM), handsearching, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. Data Selection Randomized clinical trials comparing RBC or RBC in combination with other antibiotics such as proton pump inhibitor, H2-receptor antagonist, other bismuth or placebo were included. No language and blinding limitations were applied. Inclusion criteria Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was assessed by the Jadad-scale plus allocation concealment. Statistics analysis was managed by using RevMan 4. 1. Results Fifteen randomized clinical trials including 3 638 patients were included, with eight trials of high methodological quality. Meta-analysis indicated that odds ratio was 3.06 (95%CI 2.62 to 3. 58, P lt; 0. 000 01) comparing RBC to controls. But the heterogeneity was significant (P lt; 0. 000 01), so we choose random effects model. Then the odds ratio was 2.05 (95%CI 1. 29 to 3. 25, P=0.002). No serious adverse effects were found. Sensitivity analysis showed that the specimens and the quality of RCT haven’t affected researching result. Conclusion RBC is more effective in Helicobacter Pylori eradication therapy than others.