ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on post-stroke depression (PSD).MethodsWe searched databases including the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine database and VIP database to collect randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of the rTMS group and the control group with the scores of depression scale from January 2013 to April 2018. Patients in the rTMS group received rTMS plus drug therapy or conventional treatment for PSD, and patients in the control group received rTMS sham stimulation or not, but the drug treatment or routine treatment was required. When the quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out by two reviewers independently, the Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software.ResultsA total of 18 literatures involving 1 376 patients (687 patients in the rTMS group and 689 patients in the control group) with PSD were included in this Meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the rTMS group could effectively reduce the depression scores of PSD patients [standard mean difference (SMD)=–1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) (–1.42, –0.84), P<0.000 01], and the effective rate of rTMS was 91.7%; meanwhile, rTMS could promote the scores of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and the activities of daily living of patients with PSD [SMD=–1.00, 95%CI (–1.25, –0.75), P<0.000 01;SMD=1.56, 95%CI (0.80, 2.32), P<0.000 01]. The source of heterogeneity was not found according to subgroup analysis and Meta-regression analysis. Additionally, few studies reported adverse reactions after the treatment of rTMS.ConclusionsrTMS has a positive effect on depression, neurological deficits, and decreased ability of daily living in patients with PSD. Due to the quality of the included studies, the conclusions need to be verified further.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of different stimulation modalities of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with SSRI in improving depressed mood after stroke using network meta-analysis. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives from inception to October 1, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using R 4.2.1software. ResultsA total of 25 RCTs involving 2 152 patients were included. Four types of rTMS stimulation combined with SSRIs were included: high-frequency stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal (l-DLPFC), low-frequency stimulation of l-DLPFC, low-frequency stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal (r-DLPFC), and low-frequency stimulation of the bilateral DLPFC. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that the effect of combining four stimulation methods with SSRI in treating depression was better than that of SSRI alone (P<0.05). Probability sorting results showed that low-frequency stimulated bilateral DLPFC (88.9%) > low-frequency stimulated l-DLPFC (63.1%) > high-frequency stimulation l-DLPFC (57.1%) > low-frequency stimulation r-DLPFC (40.4%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the four stimulation methods combined with SSRI and the use of SSRI alone (P>0.05). Conclusion rTMS combined with SSRIs is better than SSRIs alone in improving depressed mood after stroke. Low-frequency rTMS stimulation of bilateral DLPFC may be the best. Meanwhile, the safety of different stimulation methods is good.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on stroke patients with aphasia. MethodsDatabases such as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2014), CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data were searched up to June 2014, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about rTMS for stroke patients with aphasia. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, rTMS improved stoke patients' speech function after treatment (WMD=14.36, 95%CI 6.93 to 21.79, P=0.000 2). The results of descriptive analysis showed that, rTMS at Broadmann area 45 (1 Hz, 90% RMT, once 20 or 30 minutes, 2 or 3 weeks as a course with 2-day intervals) possibly had a positive long-term effect on post-stroke patients' speech function. ConclusionrTMS may positively improve stroke patients' speech function. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more large-scale, multicenter, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with sham therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Methods The Cochrane Library, Medline, EMbase, CBMdisk, CNKI and VIP were searched through computer from 1985 to 2011. The review included RCTs comparing the treatment efficacy of low-frequency rTMS located on right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with sham stimulation in the patients suffering major depressive disorder. The quality of the included RCTs was strictly evaluated and the data were extracted by two reviewers independently. The extracted data were analyzed by RevMan 4.2. Results Among seven double-blinded RCTs involving 234 patients included, 1 was A level in quality, 5 were B level, and 1 was C level according to the outcomes of quality evaluation. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that low frequency rTMS was superior to sham stimulation in remission rates after two weeks’ treatment (RR=3.11, 95%CI 1.56 to 6.19). Additionally, low frequency rTMS was lower than the sham stimulation in the scores of HDRS and MADRS (WMD= –6.41, 95%CI –9.32 to –3.50, and WMD= –5.27, 95%CI –9.08 to –1.46, respectively). But no significant difference in response rates between the low prequency rTMS group and the sham group was found (RR=1.72, 95%CI 0.74 to 4.01). There were no severe and intolerable side effects reported in these seven studies. Conclusion The low frequency rTMS as a non-invasive and safe technique may appear to be effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder according to the positive results but the conclusion is not definite because of negative results. This review suggests that parameters could be sited as frequency: 1 Hz, intensity: 90%-110% motor threshold (MT), location: right DLPFC and duration: 2 weeks. Nevertheless, further multicenter and high quality studies are needed before it is used as a first-line treatment for major depressive disorder.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can influence the stimulated brain regions and other distal brain regions connecting to them. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of low-frequency rTMS over primary motor cortex on brain by analyzing the brain functional connectivity and coordination between brain regions. 10 healthy subjects were recruited. 1 Hz rTMS was used to stimulate primary motor cortex for 20 min. 1 min resting state electroencephalography (EEG) was collected before and after the stimulation respectively. By performing phase synchronization analysis between the EEG electrodes, the brain functional network and its properties were calculated. Signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. The result demonstrated that the global phase synchronization in alpha frequency band was decreased significantly after low-frequency rTMS (P<0.05). The phase synchronization was down-regulated between motor cortex and ipsilateral frontal/parietal cortex, and also between contralateral parietal cortex and bilateral frontal cortex. The mean degree and global efficiency of brain functional networks in alpha frequency band were significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the mean shortest path length were significantly increased (P<0.05), which suggested the information transmission of the brain networks and its efficiency was reduced after low-frequency rTMS. This study verified the inhibition function of the low-frequency rTMS to brain activities, and demonstrated that low-frequency rTMS stimulation could affect both stimulating brain regions and distal brain regions connected to them. The findings in this study could be of guidance to clinical application of low-frequency rTMS.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied at contralesional hemisphere Broca’s homologue on patients with global aphasia after left massive cerebral infarction. Methods Patients with global aphasia after left massive cerebral infarction in the Department of Neurorehabilitation of China Rehabilitation Research Center between August 2021 and December 2023 were selected. According to the random number table method, patients were randomly divided into a low-frequency rTMS group and a high-frequency rTMS group. rTMS targeted the mirror area within the right hemispheric Broca’s area. Patients’ language ability was assessed pre- and post-treatment by the Chinese version of the western aphasia battery (WAB). Results A total of 27 patients were included, with 14 in the low-frequency rTMS group and 13 in the high-frequency rTMS group. Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the WAB test indicators between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). After treatment, WAB scores (spontaneous speech, auditory comprehension, naming, repetition, aphasia quotients) in both groups were significantly improved (P<0.05); compared to the low-frequency rTMS group, the high-frequency rTMS group exhibited significant improvement in spontaneous speech, auditory comprehension, repetition, naming and aphasia quotients (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of high-frequency rTMS excitation to contralesional hemisphere is better than that of conventional low-frequency rTMS inhibition to contralesional hemisphere in improving the speech function of patients with global aphasia after left massive cerebral infarction.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating stroke patients with motor dysfunction. Methods The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched from inception to January 2012, and the references of the included studies were also retrieved to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on rTMS in treating stroke patients with motor dysfunction. Two reviewers independently screened articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.2 software, and evidence quality and recommendation level were assessed using the GRADE system. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 376 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis (including 3 RCTs, low quality) showed that, compared with the routine rehabilitation treatment, 2 to 4 weeks of rTMS was much beneficial to stroke patients with motor dysfunction, with significant differences (WMD=11.02, 95%CI 2.56 to 19.47). The other 8 studies only adopted descriptive analysis accordingly. Conclusion It is still uncertain of the effectiveness of rTMS in improving motor dysfunction of stroke patients, so rTMS should be applied with caution in clinic.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2015), EMbase, PsycINF, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to October 2015 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about rTMS for patients with MCI. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs involving 180 MCI patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, rTMS treatment could significantly improve the overall cognitive abilities of MCI patients (SMD=2.53, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.16, P=0.002), as well as the single-domain cognitive performances, including tests for episodic memory (MD=0.98, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.72, P=0.01) and verbal fluency (MD=2.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 3.69, P=0.01). rTMS was a well-tolerated therapy, with slightly more adverse events observed than the control group (RD=0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.18, P=0.04), but cases were mainly transient headache, dizziness and scalp pain. ConclusionrTMS may benefit the cognitive abilities of MCI patients. Nevertheless, due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, large-scale, multicenter, and high quality RCTs are required to verify the conclusion.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalography(EEG) has become an important tool in brain research. However, it is difficult to remove the large artifacts in EEG signals caused by the online TMS intervention. In this paper, we summed up various types of artifacts. After introducing a variety of online methods, the paper emphasized on offline approaches, such as subtraction, principal component analysis and independent component analysis, which can remove or minimize TMS-induced artifacts according to their different characteristics. Although these approaches can deal with most of the artifacts induced by TMS, the removal of large artifacts still needs to be improved. This paper systematically summarizes the effective methods for artifacts removal in TMS-EEG studies. It is a good reference for TMS-EEG researchers while choosing the suitable artifacts removal methods.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) is a painless and non-invasive method for stimulation and modulation in the field of cognitive neuroscience research and clinical neurological regulation. In this paper, adult Wistar rats were divided into the rTMS group and control group randomly. Rats in the rTMS group were stimulated with 5 Hz rTMS for 14 days, while the rats in the control group did not accept any stimulation. Then, the behavior and local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded synchronously when the rats perform a working memory (WM) task with T-maze. Finally, the time-frequency distribution and coherence characteristics of the LFPs signal in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during working memory task were analyzed. The results showed that the rats in the rTMS group needed less training days to reach the task correction criterion than the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the rTMS group has higher energy (P < 0.01) in θ band (4~12 Hz) and γ band (30~80 Hz). The coherence between the channel pairs decreases as the spatial distance of the channel pairs increases, and the rTMS group exhibits a higher coherence than the control group (P < 0.01). It is concluded that 5 Hz rTMS can improve the excitability of rat prefrontal cortical neurons to a certain extent, and has a positive effect on the working memory ability of normal rats. The results of this paper may provide important theoretical support for further research on the mechanism of action of rTMS on WM.