Objective To establish a model of transplanting neonatal cardiomycytes into the wall of rat inferior vena cava. Methods Neonatal cardiomyocytes (n=6, 5×106cells each, A group) or medium (n=6, B group) only were transplanted into the wall of inferior vena cava in female Fisher rats. At 21 days after transplantation, the contraction of transplanted cardiomyocytes was assessed and the inferior vena cava was processed for histology. Results Distinct rhythmic beating of the vena cava at the site of cell transplantation before and after the aorties were clamped (at a rate 141± 47 rpm and 88± 44 rpm which was dramaticly lower than aortic beating, with a statistical difference at P value of 0.03). Cardiomyocyte was seen in 6 rats who had neonatal cardiomyocyte transplantation, but not in 6 rats receiving media. Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed viable cardiomyocytes in the wall of the vena cava in 6 rats treated with neonatal cardiomyocytes, but not in 6 rats receiving media. Conclusion This study shows that neonatal cardiomyocytes can survive, mature and spontaneously and rhythmically contract after they are transplanted in the wall of inferior vena cava.
ObjectiveTo discuss the implantation and conversion technology of convertible inferior vena cava filter and the experience of management.MethodsThe clinical data of 115 patients with convertible inferior vena cava filter implantation admitted to our vascular surgery center from January 2018 to December 2018 was retrospectively analyzed.ResultsAmong the 115 patients with convertible inferior vena cava filter implantation, 74 were males and 41 were females. The ages ranged from 22 to 87 years, with median age 54 years. The successful rate of filter implantation was 100% without any surgical related complications. After implantation surgery, patients were followed up from 4 to 455 days with a median of 90 days and the recurrence rate of adverse events was 7.8% (9/115). The recurrence time were 16 to 104 days after conversion, with a median of 42 days. Twenty-three patients (20.0%) received filter conversion, one of them failed and all the others succeeded. The technical successful rate was 95.7% (22/23). The conversion operative time was 22.8 to 51.4 min, with median time 27.4 min. The intervals between implantation and conversion were from 4 to 455 days, with median time 159 days. Accessory techniques were used in 20 of 22 successful filter conversions and the application rate of accessory technique was 90.9%. The patients were followed-up from 30 to 180 days after conversion with a median time of 90 days and no adverse event was reported.ConclusionConvertible inferior vena cava filter is a significant choice for patients application of inferior vena cava filter due to its high safety of conversion surgery, technical success rate and possibility of conversion after long-term indwelling.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of AngioJet thrombectomy combined with iliac vein stenting for patients diagnosed with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with iliac vein compression syndrome（IVCS）. MethodsBetween January 2021 and October 2023, a total of 64 patients with acute lower extremity DVT which performed AngioJet thrombectomy combined with iliac vein stenting in Weifang People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The changes of clinical symptoms, signs, and thrombus burden before and after operation were observed. The patency score of vein and stent, difference of thigh circumference and calf circumference diameter, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and chronic venous insufficienc questionnaire-14item (CIVIQ-14) score were recorded pre- and postsurgically, and the patency of stent was statistically evaluated by a comprehensive assessment of the postoperative 12-month angiography. ResultsOperative success was achieved in all the 64 patients. The aspiration time was 300–480 s [(313±32) s], and the operative time was 80–120 min [ (97±21) min]. No complications such as bleeding and hematoma occurred after operation. The hospitalization time was 5–12 d [ (7.5±2.8) d]. After operation, the patency score of vein and stent and the difference of thigh circumference diameter decreased or reduced, and the difference were statistically significant (P<0.001). The score of VCSS decreased, score of CIVIQ-14 increased after operation (P<0.05). Color Doppler ultrasound was performed at the first, third and sixth months after operation, and anterograde venography of lower limbs was performed at the 12th month. Only one patient had thrombosis recurrence at one month after operation, and finally developed into post-thrombosis syndrome of deep veins of lower limbs after anticoagulant conservative treatment. The veins and stents of the rest patients were unobstructed. ConclusionAngioJet thrombectomy combined with iliac vein stenting, could effectively expedited clot removal, reduced limb swelling, prevented post-thrombotic syndrome recurrence and significantly improved quality of life for patients with acute lower extremity DVT.
ObjectiveTo investigate therapeutic method, curative effect, and prognosis of inferior vena cava (IVC) blocking Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) with thrombosis. MethodsClinical data of 128 BCS patients with membranous or short-segment occlusion of IVC as well as IVC thrombosis, who accepted interventional treatment in The Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from Apr. 2004 to Jun. 2012, were retrospectively analyzed. Comparison of the difference on effect indicators between predilation group and stent filter group was performed. ResultsThereinto, 9 patients with fresh IVC thrombosis were treated with agitation thrombolysis (agitation thrombolysis group), 56 patients were predilated by small balloon (predilation group), for the rest 63 patients, a stent filter was deployed (stent filter group). Besides 1 stent filter fractured during the first removal attempt and had to be extracted surgically in the stent filter group (patients suffered with sent migration), in addition, the surgeries of other patients were technically successful without procedure-related complication. effect indicators were satisfactory in all patients, and there were no statistical differences between predilation group and stent filter group in dosage of urokinase, urokinase thrombolysis time, hospital stay, and incidence of complication (P > 0.05), but the cost of predilation group was lower than that of stent filter group (P < 0.01). All of the 128 patients were followed-up postoperation, and the duration range from 18 to 66 months with an average of 44.2 months. During the follow-up period, reobstruction of the IVC was observed in 13 patients without thrombosis, of which 1 patient in agitation thrombolysis group, 6 patients in predilation group, and 6 patients in stent filter group. There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between predilation group and stent filter group (P > 0.05). Patients with recurrence got re-expansion treatment, and no stenosis or thrombogenesis recurred. ConclusionsAgitation thrombolysis for fresh IVC trombosis in the patients with BCS is safe and effective. Predilation and stent filter techniques are all effective in the treatment of BCS with chronic IVC thrombosis, but the former technique seems to be more economic.
Objective To discuss and evaluate the value of insertion of inferior vena cava filter in treating lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods Inferior vena cava filters were placed in 46 patients with lower extremity DVT prior treatment, 20 in which were treated by therapy with anticoagulation and thrombolysis, and therapy with pressure gradient, and the other 26 patients by operation and thrombolysis therapy, and therapy with pressure gradient. Whether patients occurred pulmonary embolism was observed and the form and site of filters were monitored by periodic fluoroscopy. Results Inferior vena cava filters were placed successfully in all patients, 38 cases were implanted permanence inferior vena cava filter, 8 cases were implanted temporary inferior vena cava filter. Symptoms and signs of DVT disappeared or remitted in 44/46 patients after treatment. None of pulmonary embolism was occurred. Follow up 2-24 months (average 13 months) for 36 cases with permanence inferior vena cava filter, there was no complication of the filter and pulmonary embolism occurred. Conclusions The method of inserting inferior vena cava filter is simple and safe, which can prevent pulmonary embolism effectually to offer sufficient safeguard for the treatment of DVT.
ObjectiveTo analyze the causes of lower extremity varicose veins and assess the value of deep vein imaging in diagnosing and treating venous diseases, according to deep vein angiography examination results under digital subtraction angiography. MethodsDuring January 2012 to January 2013, 689 cases of lower limb varicose veins in 394 patients underwent lower extremity deep venous anterograde contrast examination, among which 87 patients also underwent left femoral venous trocar puncture angiography examination and 46 patients underwent femoral vein puncture inferior vena cava angiography examination at the same time. Then the results of imaging data were analyzed. ResultsThe causes of lower limb varicosity, according to its incidence, were as follows:primary deep venous valve incompetence (349 limbs of 184 patients) accounting for 50.7%, simple varicose veins of lower limbs (148 limbs of 95 patients) accounting for 21.5%, left iliac vein compression syndrome (121 limbs of 69 patients) accounting for 17.6%, cloth plus syndrome (54 limbs of 34 patients) accounting for 7.8%, post-thrombotic syndrome (16 limbs of 11 patients) accounting for 2.3%, and Klipple-Trenaunay syndrome (1 patient) accounting for 0.1%. ConclusionVaricose vein of lower limb is a common clinical manifestation of a variety of diseases, and the primary deep venous valve incompetence is the leading cause. Varicose veins of lower limb deep vein angiography is a reliable method for examination of lower extremity venous disease, and a basis for the choice of other treatments as well.
Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter on deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremity.Methods The clinical data of 65 patients with DVT of lower extremities from January 2008 to August 2009 were analyzed retrospectively, whose course of diseases were not more than 7 d and clinical type included central type and mixed type. Thirty-two cases were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter, while administrating treatment of anticoagulation and activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis, which were named as study group. Thirty-three cases were treated traditionally with thrombolysis, anticoagulation, and activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis, which were named as control group. The course of therapy was continued 10-14 d, then the efficacy in two groups patients was evaluated. Results It was (7.35±1.42) cm that circumference difference before treatment between affected extremties and unaffected extremties in study group, which of 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment was (4.21±1.12) cm， (2.87±0.98) cm, and (1.22±1.02) cm, respectively. Circumference difference between before and after treatment had significant difference in study group (Plt;0.01). It was (6.97±1.27) cm that circumference difference before treatment between affected extremties and unaffected extremties in control group, which of 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment was (5.72±1.31) cm, (4.58±0.88) cm, and (3.18±1.24) cm, respectively. Circumference difference between before treatment and 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment had significant difference in control group (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01). Circumference difference before treatment in two groups had no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). Circumference difference after treatment at different time points in two groups was significantly different, respectively (Plt;0.01). Circumference difference after treatment at different time points in study group was significantly less than that in control group, respectively (Plt;0.01). After 14 d, complete recanalization rate （71.88%, 23/32） and cure rate (71.88%, 23/32) of iliofemoral vein in study group were significant higher than that (36.36%, 12/33) in control group (Plt;0.01). No pulmonary embolism occurred. Conclusion In terms of ideal therapy targets of DVT of lower extremity, the catheterdirected thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter is obviously superior to traditional thrombolysis treatment.